Trakar
VIP Member
- Feb 28, 2011
- 1,699
- 74
- 83
I can totally understand how someone could have been very concerned in 2000 about AGW. if that is when you made up your mind about where the preponderance of evidence lay then I can see how you stopped inputting new data except if it supported your view.
I understand that many intellectually lazy people use that process, a bit of digging, find out what the people I agree with on other subjects think about it and make a decision,...but that has nothing to do with science or skepticism.