gw is a LIE!

[warriorautotech]

HEY GREENIES, HAVE A LOOK AT THIS! Heliogenic Climate Change | The Sun, not a harmless essential trace gas, drives climate change

 

[Leweman]

Don't post that crap. If it doesn't support my already biased claims then its a lie. The end.

 

[IanC]

more like exaggeration and manipulation. I liked this graph though.

 

[IanC]

another interesting graph showing an interesting correlation between sea surface temps and CO2 concentration-

the rest of the article- An Interesting Correlation Between Atmospheric CO2 and Sea Surface Temperatures « Debunk House

 

[Old Rocks]

HEY GREENIES, HAVE A LOOK AT THIS! Heliogenic Climate Change | The Sun, not a harmless essential trace gas, drives climate change

Of course, just because every Scientific Society, every National Academy of Science, and every major University disagrees with you just means that they are all a bunch of Commies, right, Comrade?

 

[westwall]

HEY GREENIES, HAVE A LOOK AT THIS! Heliogenic Climate Change | The Sun, not a harmless essential trace gas, drives climate change

Of course, just because every Scientific Society, every National Academy of Science, and every major University disagrees with you just means that they are all a bunch of Commies, right, Comrade?

Who cares. All the Scientific Societies in the world claimed that Wegener was wrong too, guess what it was them that was wrong.

 

[Old Rocks]

No, they did not claim that Wegener was wrong. They stated, correctly at that time, that there was no known mechanism through which the continents could 'drift' through ocean basalts to their present locations. Wegener's catalogueing of the similiar formations and fossils on both sides of the Atlantic in Africa and South America was a tour de force for his time.

 

[IanC]

No, they did not claim that Wegener was wrong. They stated, correctly at that time, that there was no known mechanism through which the continents could 'drift' through ocean basalts to their present locations. Wegener's catalogueing of the similiar formations and fossils on both sides of the Atlantic in Africa and South America was a tour de force for his time.

fifty years from now they are going to laugh at us for ignoring the natural reasons for climate variance and choosing to worship CO2 instead.

 

[Old Rocks]

Fifty years from now they are going to be asking what dumb asses like you were ever thinking.

 

[IanC]

you prophets of doom have been around as long as humans have existed. every other prophesy was wrong but this one is going to come true? riiiiiiight

 

[westwall]

Fifty years from now they are going to be asking what dumb asses like you were ever thinking.

Hell, ten years from now the world is going to wonder how you people could be so dense.

 

[warriorautotech]

I don't understand how the issue of global warning can be so strongly debated by scientists and still be accepted as fact by so many people.I can,however, understand all the governments accepting it because they can pass environmental laws which require the people to spend money , greed.

 

[warriorautotech]

It does appear that popular opinion in our own government may be shifting away from gw.
We can only hope that they will come to their senses before they (our leaders) completely destroy our own economy.

 

[Old Rocks]

Uh, tote, it ain't being debated by real scientists in the context whether it is occuring or not. The overwhelming consensus is that it is occurring and a clear and present danger. The debates at present are on the speed of the changes, and the significance of various feedbacks.

AGU Position Statement: Human Impacts on Climate

 

[skookerasbil]

The Great Global Warming Deception By Bob Ellis on May 28th, 2009

The Oregon Institute of Science and Medicine has a video/slideshow presentation which shows once again that worshippers of the religion of global warming are full of hot air.

Al Gore and fellow socialists at the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)–a political organization, not a scientific one–and elsewhere desperately want people to believe the earth is going through unprecedented warming…and that it’s all the fault of those evil coal-burning, SUV-driving capitalists.

Unfortunately for them, this crazy idea not only doesn’t meet the test of science, it doesn’t even pass the smell-test. As a commenter at Free Republic said, ordinary folk can recognize bull feces by the smell and don’t need the recipe. But thanks to information such as this report from Arthur B. Robinson, Noah E. Robinson and Willie Soon, those who need the recipe to see the light have it.

One of the things they point out is that temperatures were far higher in the past (see graph to the left), long before SUVs or power plants were ever built. The Vikings colonized Greenland (now covered in ice) and the land was even warm enough to plant vineyards.

Their data also shows a correlation between temperature changes and solar activity. Imagine that: the big star in the middle of our solar system burning at 11,000 degrees F can actually change the temperature here on earth! That might also explain the warming occurring on Mars and Jupiter and other planets in the solar system; somehow the apostles of global warming just can’t bring themselves to accept that the sun can affect temperatures on earth, though.

You can watch a video presentation of the slides here, or read the entire report–including charts–here.

No, there is no need whatsoever for our government to treat the American people worse than belligerent foreign dictators, to destroy thousands of jobs, to subject the American people to 40% higher electric bills–all to possibly lower the temperature by 9/100ths of a degree over 40 years…all for an empty deception.

The American people need to send a loud and clear message to the socialists in Washington: we won’t stand for your phony global warming tax!

The Great Global Warming Deception









And lets not forget, of course,.....the "consensus" is arrived at by about 2 dozen scientists worldwide!!!

 

[driveby]

If GW is so obvious, why has the name changed from global warming to climate change?.......

 

[skookerasbil]

Real interesting read here..........on the stark differences between the science of the IPCC and professional science. A passage.............

First and foremost, Prof. Reiter believes, the IPCC is a creature of government that meets governmental needs and abides by governmental strictures, and does so without public scrutiny. In contrast, studies conducted under the more open auspices of the U.S. government's Global Climate Change Research program, for example, are entirely in the public domain.

Even the peer-review process -- ordinarily designed to ensure rigorous science -- has mutated to meet IPCC needs. In professional science, the names of peer reviewers are kept confidential to encourage independent criticism, free of recrimination, while the deliberations of the authors being critiqued are made public.

"The IPCC turns this on its head," Prof. Reiter explains. "The peer reviewers have to give their names to the authors, but the deliberations of the authors are strictly confidential." In effect, the science is spun, disagreements purged, and results predetermined.

"The Intergovernmental Panel is precisely that -- it is a panel among governments. Any scientist who participates in this process expecting the strictures of science to reign must beware, lest he be stung."

Bitten by the IPCC








Indeed..............you'd best conform to the beliefs of the body of the IPCC before you even think of applying. And these are the scientists..........those of the IPCC...........that Old Rocks refers to as "real scientists". Indeed........there is no such thing as "rigorous science" at the IPCC.


Why do you think over 9,000 PHd scientists have called the IPCC science "bogus"???

 

[skookerasbil]

 

[Midnight Marauder]

Fifty years from now they are going to be asking what dumb asses like you were ever thinking.

Climate Science has never been wrong. There are NO rational reasons to be skeptical of it:

Rain follows the plow - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Leading Climate Scientists don't make wild claims:

Snowfalls are now just a thing of the past - Environment - The Independent

All skeptics are just anti-science.

 

[skookerasbil]

Fifty years from now they are going to be asking what dumb asses like you were ever thinking.

Climate Science has never been wrong. There are NO rational reasons to be skeptical of it:

Rain follows the plow - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Leading Climate Scientists don't make wild claims:

Snowfalls are now just a thing of the past - Environment - The Independent

All skeptics are just anti-science.

Midnight FTW.................


Look.........most of the public are too disinterested to take a look at what is a highly coordinated political movement which started back in the 1970s'. It never had anything to do with science. Science has always been the vehicle used to fabricate the hoax..........and a brilliant strategy it has been............make no mistake. It has always been about anti-capitalism and world governemnt. Wealth distribution in a nutshell...........and as the years have gone by, lots and lots of corporate entities have climed aboard to get their slice of the pie ( General Electric, first and foremots). Like anything else of this magnitude..........always comes down to following the $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$.