Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
"gun murder rate drops again in 2014...as over 12.8 million carry guns for self defense.."
And here is yet another example of one of your ridiculous threads that fails as a confusion of correlation and causation fallacy – there is no evidence whatsoever that the decrease in murders where guns were used has anything to do with citizens carrying concealed firearms.
Again: you're truly ignorant and ridiculous, you do more to undermine the rights enshrined in the Second Amendment than any so-called 'gun-grabber.'
The Second Amendment recognizes the fundamental right of citizens to carry firearms pursuant to lawful self-defense – no other 'justification' or 'qualifications' are required; indeed, citizens are not required to 'justify' the exercising of a Constitutional right to in fact exercise that right.
As a consequence of ignorance and stupidity you incorrectly believe you've got to promote these failed, inane 'arguments' in support of the rights enshrined in the Second Amendment when in fact your posts have exactly the opposite effect, casting gun owners in a negative light as clueless dullards incapable rational, reasonable thought.
except for 18 studies…..that looked at the actual issue….
And almost all 18 are done by the same disgraced economist. There are many studies done by many different people that say carry doesn't affect crime rates.
"gun murder rate drops again in 2014...as over 12.8 million carry guns for self defense.."
And here is yet another example of one of your ridiculous threads that fails as a confusion of correlation and causation fallacy – there is no evidence whatsoever that the decrease in murders where guns were used has anything to do with citizens carrying concealed firearms.
Again: you're truly ignorant and ridiculous, you do more to undermine the rights enshrined in the Second Amendment than any so-called 'gun-grabber.'
The Second Amendment recognizes the fundamental right of citizens to carry firearms pursuant to lawful self-defense – no other 'justification' or 'qualifications' are required; indeed, citizens are not required to 'justify' the exercising of a Constitutional right to in fact exercise that right.
As a consequence of ignorance and stupidity you incorrectly believe you've got to promote these failed, inane 'arguments' in support of the rights enshrined in the Second Amendment when in fact your posts have exactly the opposite effect, casting gun owners in a negative light as clueless dullards incapable rational, reasonable thought.
except for 18 studies…..that looked at the actual issue….
And almost all 18 are done by the same disgraced economist. There are many studies done by many different people that say carry doesn't affect crime rates.
Nope…you lie, Lott, the leader in the field has done 6, the other 12 by other researchers…you know this and you just lied….and there are 10 who say it doesn't effect the crime rate and 1 that says it does…..I have linked to these studies numerous times, and you always choose to lie…..
The idiot here is you. You either are to stupid to know that the RIGHT to carry is not in fact universal and has been denied for years in some locations or you are lying. Your claim that the right is universal is moronic and ignores reality. You are an idiot."gun murder rate drops again in 2014...as over 12.8 million carry guns for self defense.."
And here is yet another example of one of your ridiculous threads that fails as a confusion of correlation and causation fallacy – there is no evidence whatsoever that the decrease in murders where guns were used has anything to do with citizens carrying concealed firearms.
Again: you're truly ignorant and ridiculous, you do more to undermine the rights enshrined in the Second Amendment than any so-called 'gun-grabber.'
The Second Amendment recognizes the fundamental right of citizens to carry firearms pursuant to lawful self-defense – no other 'justification' or 'qualifications' are required; indeed, citizens are not required to 'justify' the exercising of a Constitutional right to in fact exercise that right.
As a consequence of ignorance and stupidity you incorrectly believe you've got to promote these failed, inane 'arguments' in support of the rights enshrined in the Second Amendment when in fact your posts have exactly the opposite effect, casting gun owners in a negative light as clueless dullards incapable rational, reasonable thought.
There are stats for 2015 so far, thus the articles on the alarming rise in murders.Yes.Doesn't the US have the high number of gun related deaths of any first world nation?
Forget trying to have a discussion with this guy. He just makes things up to promote his agenda.
Here he is talking about 2014 and ignoring what is going on now because it does not fit his agenda.
His avatar is of a famous alcoholic who is a laughing stock, that should tell you something.
Moron…..we don't have stats for 2015……that is why I am not discussing 2015…..you are a dipshit…...
Doesn't the US have the high number of gun related deaths of any first world nation?
No….I think that would be Russia.
For every gun used to murder someone, almost 37,000 are not.
Ya since the 1990's we have been told over and over that allowing open carry or concealed carry would lead to a blood bath and scenes from the wild west. Hasn't happened yet, but every time a new law is made allowing it the same claims are made by the same people. Further we have been told we have an epidemic of mass shootings, again a fairy tale told by gun grabbers.
For every gun used to murder someone, almost 37,000 are not.
The US has 10.64 fire-arm related deaths per 100,000 population.
In relation, the United Kingdom has 0.26 fire-arm related deaths per 100,000 population.
Which country has the better idea?
There are stats for 2015 so far, thus the articles on the alarming rise in murders.
For every gun used to murder someone, almost 37,000 are not.
The US has 10.64 fire-arm related deaths per 100,000 population.
In relation, the United Kingdom has 0.26 fire-arm related deaths per 100,000 population.
Which country has the better idea?
The US.... Which rests upon American Principle.
99.99999999999~% of US firearms are owned by individuals living outside of Socialist Population Centers. And absent US Population Centers, Fire-arm Related Deaths in the US are the lowest on Earth.
There are stats for 2015 so far, thus the articles on the alarming rise in murders.
Well likely the Result of the Left's public call to murder Police Officers and Whites.
Such is simply the nature of evil... .
There are stats for 2015 so far, thus the articles on the alarming rise in murders.
Well likely the Result of the Left's public call to murder Police Officers and Whites.
Such is simply the nature of evil... .
Haven't the majority of cop killing been committed by RWN's?
In Vegas, we had two cops executed by members of the Bundy teabaggers.
For every gun used to murder someone, almost 37,000 are not.
The US has 10.64 fire-arm related deaths per 100,000 population.
In relation, the United Kingdom has 0.26 fire-arm related deaths per 100,000 population.
Which country has the better idea?
"gun murder rate drops again in 2014...as over 12.8 million carry guns for self defense.."
And here is yet another example of one of your ridiculous threads that fails as a confusion of correlation and causation fallacy – there is no evidence whatsoever that the decrease in murders where guns were used has anything to do with citizens carrying concealed firearms.
Again: you're truly ignorant and ridiculous, you do more to undermine the rights enshrined in the Second Amendment than any so-called 'gun-grabber.'
The Second Amendment recognizes the fundamental right of citizens to carry firearms pursuant to lawful self-defense – no other 'justification' or 'qualifications' are required; indeed, citizens are not required to 'justify' the exercising of a Constitutional right to in fact exercise that right.
As a consequence of ignorance and stupidity you incorrectly believe you've got to promote these failed, inane 'arguments' in support of the rights enshrined in the Second Amendment when in fact your posts have exactly the opposite effect, casting gun owners in a negative light as clueless dullards incapable rational, reasonable thought.
except for 18 studies…..that looked at the actual issue….
And almost all 18 are done by the same disgraced economist. There are many studies done by many different people that say carry doesn't affect crime rates.
Nope…you lie, Lott, the leader in the field has done 6, the other 12 by other researchers…you know this and you just lied….and there are 10 who say it doesn't effect the crime rate and 1 that says it does…..I have linked to these studies numerous times, and you always choose to lie…..
Are you including the newest one? I doubt it. So link just the 12 that are not lott.
There are stats for 2015 so far, thus the articles on the alarming rise in murders.Yes.Doesn't the US have the high number of gun related deaths of any first world nation?
Forget trying to have a discussion with this guy. He just makes things up to promote his agenda.
Here he is talking about 2014 and ignoring what is going on now because it does not fit his agenda.
His avatar is of a famous alcoholic who is a laughing stock, that should tell you something.
Moron…..we don't have stats for 2015……that is why I am not discussing 2015…..you are a dipshit…...
"gun murder rate drops again in 2014...as over 12.8 million carry guns for self defense.."
And here is yet another example of one of your ridiculous threads that fails as a confusion of correlation and causation fallacy – there is no evidence whatsoever that the decrease in murders where guns were used has anything to do with citizens carrying concealed firearms.
Again: you're truly ignorant and ridiculous, you do more to undermine the rights enshrined in the Second Amendment than any so-called 'gun-grabber.'
The Second Amendment recognizes the fundamental right of citizens to carry firearms pursuant to lawful self-defense – no other 'justification' or 'qualifications' are required; indeed, citizens are not required to 'justify' the exercising of a Constitutional right to in fact exercise that right.
As a consequence of ignorance and stupidity you incorrectly believe you've got to promote these failed, inane 'arguments' in support of the rights enshrined in the Second Amendment when in fact your posts have exactly the opposite effect, casting gun owners in a negative light as clueless dullards incapable rational, reasonable thought.
except for 18 studies…..that looked at the actual issue….
And almost all 18 are done by the same disgraced economist. There are many studies done by many different people that say carry doesn't affect crime rates.
Nope…you lie, Lott, the leader in the field has done 6, the other 12 by other researchers…you know this and you just lied….and there are 10 who say it doesn't effect the crime rate and 1 that says it does…..I have linked to these studies numerous times, and you always choose to lie…..
Are you including the newest one? I doubt it. So link just the 12 that are not lott.
For every gun used to murder someone, almost 37,000 are not.
The US has 10.64 fire-arm related deaths per 100,000 population.
In relation, the United Kingdom has 0.26 fire-arm related deaths per 100,000 population.
Which country has the better idea?
The US.... Which rests upon American Principle.
99.99999999999~% of US firearms are owned by individuals living outside of Socialist Population Centers. And absent US Population Centers, Fire-arm Related Deaths in the US are the lowest on Earth.
There are less people killed by guns in areas of less population. BRILLIANT!
For every gun used to murder someone, almost 37,000 are not.
The US has 10.64 fire-arm related deaths per 100,000 population.
In relation, the United Kingdom has 0.26 fire-arm related deaths per 100,000 population.
Which country has the better idea?
The US.... Which rests upon American Principle.
99.99999999999~% of US firearms are owned by individuals living outside of Socialist Population Centers. And absent US Population Centers, Fire-arm Related Deaths in the US are the lowest on Earth.
There are less people killed by guns in areas of less population. BRILLIANT!
For every gun used to murder someone, almost 37,000 are not.
The US has 10.64 fire-arm related deaths per 100,000 population.
In relation, the United Kingdom has 0.26 fire-arm related deaths per 100,000 population.
Which country has the better idea?
The US.... Which rests upon American Principle.
99.99999999999~% of US firearms are owned by individuals living outside of Socialist Population Centers. And absent US Population Centers, Fire-arm Related Deaths in the US are the lowest on Earth.
There are less people killed by guns in areas of less population. BRILLIANT!
No dipshit....here you go....gun murder happens in small areas, usually controlled by democrats...
Blog: Who gets shot in Chicago?
Sooooo...Chicago had an estimated population of 2,718,782....in 2013.....and from this study....
About 70 percent of the killings occurred in what Papachristos found was a social network of only about 1,600 people — out of a population of about 80,000 in those neighborhoods.
So 1600 people out of 2,718,782 commit 70% of all gun crime........in one small area of this city.....let alone who knows about the other gang infested tiny areas......
And the irrational, anti gunners think that guns are the problem.......who are the real nuts....?
The article from the Sun Tims....
New study shows likelihood of being shot in Chicago
The ar
