Old Rocks
Diamond Member
I am open to all scientific ideas but to claim one source is credible over another defies the very nature of scientific fact. One side has an unproven hypothesis that they are trying to promote as facts.
Good lord. Virtually every Scientific Society, every National Academy of Science, and every major University states that AGW is real, and a clear and present danger.
Quite on the contrary, you are not open to any science that contradicts your political ideology. Reality has a way of trumping ideology, usually to the chagrin of the ideologues.
The only one to bring politics into this IS YOU. Science trumps politics because its based in FACT while your politics is based in EMOTION.
I have yet to see anything but CLAIMS of proof of anything in this thread. Nothing but emotional hyperbole disguised as fact.
I will also admit that it is likely we are having an impact. Difference being to what degree and of course the fact that I'm not willing to settle for some bullshit lifestyle so some schmuck 2000 years from now doesn't have to deal with a one or two degree increase in temperature. You guys are the same wackos that would stop driving cars if you thought it would save some exotic species of grasshopper in South America.
Damn. Not what I would expect to see posted from someone with any intellect at all. And it is not one or two degrees in a thousand years. It is four or more degrees by the end of this century.