jreeves
Senior Member
- Feb 12, 2008
- 6,588
- 319
- 48
So Professor Calzada did this study with the aid of the almighty "Heritage Foundation"!
Fellow collaborators:
1) Robert P. Murphy-a "free-market oriented author" (probably wants no changes because he's afraid that his lifestyle might change), fellow at Pacific Research Institute (conservative think tank), and townhall.com where he allows clowns and psychopaths such as Ann Coulter and Neal Boortz to contribute....that was all I needed to read about him, as I'm convinced that he stopped caring about the common man years ago.
2) Ben Lieberman-senior policy analyst at the Heritage Foundation (those who want to privatize social security, want to teach abstinence which has been proven time and again to be unreliable, and oh I could go on and on as I've been reading these lovely contributions for years). I won't deny that they are clever individuals (Heritage) but some of their ideas are out of touch with reality.
3) Institute for Energy Research-where much of this was funded....major contributor to IER-Exxon Mobil.
3)William T. Bogart-One of the contributors to, "7 Myths About Green Jobs"...a quote from the article-
"We are equally confident that a market-based delivery process will do a far better job of developing those energy sources, industries, and jobs than could a series of mandates based on flawed data."
Yeah...DRILL BABY, DRILL!
It just seems to me that these gentlemen have some interest at stake here.
Now what to do with Clinton's statement?