Silhouette
Gold Member
- Jul 15, 2013
- 25,815
- 1,938
- 265
- Thread starter
- #61
Well St. Mike, why else would Kamala Harris, knowing that because the title of the proposed statute must include its intent (to revise the death penalty) and it is invalid therefore, profess to not be able to do anything about it? She's participating in the ruse for political advantage for her pet cause: rule of California with a rainbow-iron fist. I suspect if you trace her campaign finance money backwards, you'll find the rainbow-alliance behind it.
Haven't you been paying attention? That's what I've argued all along. I know this lawyer is plugging for the fag militia.
And the AG's stance? Do you believe Kamala Harris when she throws her hands up in the air and claims there isn't a thing she can do about a two-subject initiative without either clearly stated in the title? (Both grounds for rejection on the ballot)..