R
rdean
Guest
- Thread starter
- #21
The reason Democrats did not go after Bush is there was nothing they could find to nail him on that Democrats were not a party to. Over the last 2 years Democrats have proven there were no facts to back their political rhetoric. Democrats have continued to prosecute the wars & continue much of the Bush agenda that weakened privacy rights.
On the other hand Democrats may have traded their Bush witch hunt for congress to overlook that Democrats ACORN & SEIU have colluded to undermine the democratic election system.
I like that twist and dodge. Only, it doesn't work.
Why all this thing with Acorn. Sure, some of the workers fraudulently registered Paul Newman and Donald Duck, but did Paul Newman and Donald Duck turn up to vote? Never. And who reported the fraudulent registration? Turns out it was Acorn employees.
I wish Republicans would point to "real" problems.
Problems like:
How did the US end up in Iraq?
How did 9 billion "disappear"?
How could only a couple of people be responsible for Enron?
How could 2.4 million jobs move to China from 2001 to 2008?
And why do Republicans want to blame everything on Democrats? From 2006 to 2008, Democrats held 49 senate seats. Yes, ONLY 49. How is that a majority? Because "independent" Joe Lieberman caucused with Democrats? The Joe Lieberman who endorsed John McCain? THAT Joe Lieberman?
I would love Republicans to take some iota of responsibility. Just a tad. Only a tiny, itty bit.
At least once. Just a single time.