GOP leader told Obama ‘I cannot even stand to look at you’

[P@triot]

It's not a fact, it's a lie, perpetuated by you because you are a pathological liar.

Says the lying asshole who ignores links to news stories by major news outlets...

You've got nothing but your lies asshole. I have tons and tons of links to major news stories. You lose asshole.

Oh now they are major news outlets? You mean the liberal media are now major news outlets ? You talking about the MSM, or the lame stream media, or the liberal media or any other derogatory you usually label the media? But now, since it suits your extremist agenda you adore and cite the MSM. FAIL! Your links are still frauds!

Where is your link supporting your lie that my links are "frauds"? You lose!

 

[TheSeventhTiger]

whats the big deal, harry reid tells that to the witch every week.

 

[kidrocks]

Says the lying asshole who ignores links to news stories by major news outlets...

You've got nothing but your lies asshole. I have tons and tons of links to major news stories. You lose asshole.

Oh now they are major news outlets? You mean the liberal media are now major news outlets ? You talking about the MSM, or the lame stream media, or the liberal media or any other derogatory you usually label the media? But now, since it suits your extremist agenda you adore and cite the MSM. FAIL! Your links are still frauds!

Where is your link supporting your lie that my links are "frauds"? You lose!

Here it is...

The irony of blaming Obamacare for layoffs | eLetters ? The Denver Post

Congress should ensure that companies retaliating against the American public for electing the “wrong guy” or failing to repeal Obamacare should be disqualified from contracting with the government if it’s related to Obamacare. Businesses threatening to cut or outsource jobs in protest should not reap windfall profits realized from the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. This sends a clear message that you do not bite the hand that feeds you.

 

[Amelia]

Oh now they are major news outlets? You mean the liberal media are now major news outlets ? You talking about the MSM, or the lame stream media, or the liberal media or any other derogatory you usually label the media? But now, since it suits your extremist agenda you adore and cite the MSM. FAIL! Your links are still frauds!

Where is your link supporting your lie that my links are "frauds"? You lose!

Here it is...

The irony of blaming Obamacare for layoffs | eLetters ? The Denver Post

Congress should ensure that companies retaliating against the American public for electing the “wrong guy” or failing to repeal Obamacare should be disqualified from contracting with the government if it’s related to Obamacare. Businesses threatening to cut or outsource jobs in protest should not reap windfall profits realized from the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. This sends a clear message that you do not bite the hand that feeds you.

Fortune 500 companies? Retaliating for electing the wrong guy? Protests? Sorry, that doesn't address the job loss news outlets have been reporting in connection with the anticipated costs of the employer mandate [edit: and changes in healthcare payment and delivery].

It also doesn't address collateral damage such as in the medical transcription business where the ACA has brought about drastic changes faster than natural technological evolution would have caused.

 

[TheSeventhTiger]

I really feel sorry for Dick Durbins wife who has to look at him on a regular basis.

 

[kidrocks]

Says the lying asshole who ignores links to news stories by major news outlets...

You've got nothing but your lies asshole. I have tons and tons of links to major news stories. You lose asshole.

Here's your link...

Oh now they are major news outlets? You mean the liberal media are now major news outlets ? You talking about the MSM, or the lame stream media, or the liberal media or any other derogatory you usually label the media? But now, since it suits your extremist agenda you adore and cite the MSM. FAIL! Your links are still frauds!

Where is your link supporting your lie that my links are "frauds"? You lose!

Is Obamacare to Blame for Hospital Layoffs? - US News and World Report

Ron Stiver, senior vice president of engagement and public affairs for Indiana University Health, which plans to cut 800 employees, says the assertion that health care reform is the reason behind hospital cuts is "overly simplified." IU Health is making cuts partially because of the health law, he says, but also because the state has not expanded Medicaid, the hospital system has fewer inpatient volumes, and payment rates for its services have been declining.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Democratic Congressman Charles Rangel from New York, the main sponsor of the health reform bill, says organizations have several other tools they could use to reduce costs, and that many businesses are blaming health reform for actions for which they don't want to take responsibility. "U.S. health costs have been the highest in the world, yet our quality measures were middling at best," he says. "While there is no doubt that [health reform] has helped slow health care cost growth, which is beneficial to both national and household budgets, there is nothing in the law that tells hospitals to reduce staff. The fact is that patients are paying less, not more, as a result of the [health law]."

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The requirements that hospitals must meet in order to receive full Medicare reimbursements are having a large impact. Hospitals once were able to bill insurance companies and the federal government for services rendered, but now they have to demonstrate that those services help keep patients healthy.

 

[kidrocks]

Where is your link supporting your lie that my links are "frauds"? You lose!

Here it is...

The irony of blaming Obamacare for layoffs | eLetters ? The Denver Post

Congress should ensure that companies retaliating against the American public for electing the “wrong guy” or failing to repeal Obamacare should be disqualified from contracting with the government if it’s related to Obamacare. Businesses threatening to cut or outsource jobs in protest should not reap windfall profits realized from the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. This sends a clear message that you do not bite the hand that feeds you.

Fortune 500 companies? Retaliating for electing the wrong guy? Protests? Sorry, that doesn't address the job loss news outlets have been reporting in connection with the anticipated costs of the employer mandate [edit: and changes in healthcare payment and delivery].

It also doesn't address collateral damage such as in the medical transcription business where the ACA has brought about drastic changes faster than natural technological evolution would have caused.

It certainly does Amelia, layoffs that were already planned are now conveniently blamed on Obamacare. Hundreds of companies that produce inferior products and services are now blaming Obamacare for layoffs because they refuse to upgrade or improve and thus being exposed as such. Open your eyes Amelia. Educate yourself... read, investigate, and read some more, expand your horizons.

 

[OODA_Loop]

Hundreds of companies that produce inferior products and services are now blaming Obamacare for layoffs because they refuse to upgrade or improve and thus being exposed as such. Open your eyes Amelia. Educate yourself... read, investigate, and read some more, expand your horizons.

Please name one of the hundreds of companies

 

[Amelia]

Here it is...

The irony of blaming Obamacare for layoffs | eLetters ? The Denver Post

Fortune 500 companies? Retaliating for electing the wrong guy? Protests? Sorry, that doesn't address the job loss news outlets have been reporting in connection with the anticipated costs of the employer mandate [edit: and changes in healthcare payment and delivery].

It also doesn't address collateral damage such as in the medical transcription business where the ACA has brought about drastic changes faster than natural technological evolution would have caused.

It certainly does Amelia, layoffs that were already planned are now conveniently blamed on Obamacare. Hundreds of companies that produce inferior products and services are now blaming Obamacare for layoffs because they refuse to upgrade or improve and thus being exposed as such. Open your eyes Amelia. Educate yourself... read, investigate, and read some more, expand your horizons.

Oh brother.

The layoffs and reduced hours are across the spectrum. They are not all being done by people who objected to Obama or the ACA. Even colleges have decided they had to cut back hours because the ACA burden would be too onerous.

Obama promised that if people liked their insurance they could keep it. That is just one falsehood of many he told to make this boondoggle happen.

Your denial is of pleistocene proportions. I'm through playing with you for now.

 

[Vox]

Fortune 500 companies? Retaliating for electing the wrong guy? Protests? Sorry, that doesn't address the job loss news outlets have been reporting in connection with the anticipated costs of the employer mandate [edit: and changes in healthcare payment and delivery].

It also doesn't address collateral damage such as in the medical transcription business where the ACA has brought about drastic changes faster than natural technological evolution would have caused.

It certainly does Amelia, layoffs that were already planned are now conveniently blamed on Obamacare. Hundreds of companies that produce inferior products and services are now blaming Obamacare for layoffs because they refuse to upgrade or improve and thus being exposed as such. Open your eyes Amelia. Educate yourself... read, investigate, and read some more, expand your horizons.

Oh brother.

The layoffs and reduced hours are across the spectrum. They are not all being done by people who objected to Obama or the ACA. Even colleges have decided they had to cut back hours because the ACA burden would be too onerous.

Obama promised that if people liked their insurance they could keep it. That is just one falsehood of many he told to make this boondoggle happen.

Your denial is of pleistocene proportions. I'm through playing with you for now.

You are talking to a mouthpiece, Amelia.
There is no way any reason can get through.

If the layoffs were already planned - the the economy is not doing so well, as obamonomics propagandists want us to believe?

 

[kidrocks]

Hundreds of companies that produce inferior products and services are now blaming Obamacare for layoffs because they refuse to upgrade or improve and thus being exposed as such. Open your eyes Amelia. Educate yourself... read, investigate, and read some more, expand your horizons.

Please name one of the hundreds of companies

Walgreens

 

[kidrocks]

Hundreds of companies that produce inferior products and services are now blaming Obamacare for layoffs because they refuse to upgrade or improve and thus being exposed as such. Open your eyes Amelia. Educate yourself... read, investigate, and read some more, expand your horizons.

Please name one of the hundreds of companies

Walgreens

For weeks, headlines have cataloged the upheaval at private employers: UPS dropping coverage for employed spouses, IBM reworking retiree benefits. Yesterday came the biggest change: Walgreen Co. (WAG), the largest U.S. drugstore chain, told 160,000 workers they must buy insurance through a private exchange rather than having the company arrange their coverage.

None of the moves was dictated by the health-care law. All, though, have occurred in an environment shaped by Obamacare, which has pushed businesses and governments to reexamine their health-care role as costs soar and national priorities shift. The act now is giving businesses cover to loosen the decades-old link between jobs and health insurance, a shift that may further cloud the outlook for an already unpopular law.

 

[MeBelle]

Hundreds of companies that produce inferior products and services are now blaming Obamacare for layoffs because they refuse to upgrade or improve and thus being exposed as such. Open your eyes Amelia. Educate yourself... read, investigate, and read some more, expand your horizons.

Please name one of the hundreds of companies

Walgreens

Wut?

Walgreen moves employees to private healthcare exchange | Reuters

(Reuters) - Walgreen Co, the largest U.S. drugstore, is moving 120,000 employees to a private health insurance exchange where they can choose a plan from multiple insurers, a sign of the shifting landscape for corporate healthcare because of rising costs.

The pharmacy chain and 17 other large employers will offer their employee insurance for 2014 through the Aon Hewitt Corporate Health Exchange, part of a national move in which companies are playing a less direct role in providing health insurance coverage themselves.

For example, IBM Corp and Time Warner Inc recently said they are moving retirees to exchanges for those not yet Medicare-eligible and other exchanges for those who are.

The end-cost of these plans sold on these different types of exchanges depends on the plan chosen, but the purchasers will have more options than under traditional arrangements. The Aon Hewitt exchange that Walgreen is using will offer employees insurance plans from multiple companies including UnitedHealth Group Inc and Aetna.

 

[MeBelle]

Hundreds of companies that produce inferior products and services are now blaming Obamacare for layoffs because they refuse to upgrade or improve and thus being exposed as such. Open your eyes Amelia. Educate yourself... read, investigate, and read some more, expand your horizons.

Please name one of the hundreds of companies

Walgreens

For weeks, headlines have cataloged the upheaval at private employers: UPS dropping coverage for employed spouses, IBM reworking retiree benefits. Yesterday came the biggest change: Walgreen Co. (WAG), the largest U.S. drugstore chain, told 160,000 workers they must buy insurance through a private exchange rather than having the company arrange their coverage.

None of the moves was dictated by the health-care law. All, though, have occurred in an environment shaped by Obamacare, which has pushed businesses and governments to reexamine their health-care role as costs soar and national priorities shift. The act now is giving businesses cover to loosen the decades-old link between jobs and health insurance, a shift that may further cloud the outlook for an already unpopular law.

Where are the layoffs?

 

[kidrocks]

Please name one of the hundreds of companies

Walgreens

For weeks, headlines have cataloged the upheaval at private employers: UPS dropping coverage for employed spouses, IBM reworking retiree benefits. Yesterday came the biggest change: Walgreen Co. (WAG), the largest U.S. drugstore chain, told 160,000 workers they must buy insurance through a private exchange rather than having the company arrange their coverage.

None of the moves was dictated by the health-care law. All, though, have occurred in an environment shaped by Obamacare, which has pushed businesses and governments to reexamine their health-care role as costs soar and national priorities shift. The act now is giving businesses cover to loosen the decades-old link between jobs and health insurance, a shift that may further cloud the outlook for an already unpopular law.

Where are the layoffs?

You want layoffs?

 

[RetiredGySgt]

Walgreens

Where are the layoffs?

You want layoffs?

Since your op is false I see in order to keep the thread going you have changed the subject.

 

[Sallow]

People are hurting because of the ACA. Losing insurance. Losing health care. Losing wages. Losing jobs. Anticipating tapping into their savings to pay for higher rates. Deciding not to seek care beyond the basics if they can avoid it because they can't afford the out of pocket. None of your deflection or cryptic answers changes the facts that as one group of people finally is able to purchase insurance, another is suffering. Obama's promises are broken.

If you are any sign then these people will not find relief. If Democrats won't even acknowledge the suffering, then these people are SOL.

No they are not.

Really [MENTION=25283]Sallow[/MENTION]? They aren't losing their health insurance?

Are these people still getting their insurance through their employer or spouses employer?
UPS Dropping Spouses Health Coverage - Business Insider

Are these people still getting their insurance through their employer or spouses employer?
Hospital Staff Under The Knife: Layoffs Pick Up As ObamaCare Looms - Investors.com

Are these people still getting their insurance through their employer or spouses employer?
Citing Obamacare, Cleveland Clinic to Cut $300M, Warns of Layoffs - US News and World Report

Are these people still getting their insurance through their employer or spouses employer?
Bonnie Doon Ice Cream blames Obamacare for plant shutdown - Fox 28: South Bend, Elkhart IN News, Weather, Sports

Are these people still getting their insurance through their employer or spouses employer?
Medical Company Smith & Nephew Lays Off Almost 100 People, Blames Obamacare

Are these people still getting their insurance through their employer or spouses employer?
Hospitals Suffering From Mass Layoffs Thanks to Obamacare - Katie Pavlich

Do you have idea how stupid you sound Swallow? This is so humiliating for your dumb ass. You literally keep displaying to the world how stupid you are...

@Rottweiler

Do you have any idea how gay you sound asking a 52 year old heterosexual male to swallow his jiz?

Eeeeww..faggot.

And most if not all of these stories have been completely debunked.


Now..you may want to find yourself a different partner..since I don't swing that way.

May I suggest:

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D235JQtx_7Y]DJ Hi-Tek Rulez [Die Antwoord] - YouTube[/ame]

He do a punk ass white boy like you right.

 

[kidrocks]

Where are the layoffs?

You want layoffs?

Since your op is false I see in order to keep the thread going you have changed the subject.

I've been led astray Sgt, it happens you know, threads evolve and change, soon, not many remember the original topic or why they came here in the first place. Now, about my op... what was it again?

 

[Quantum Windbag]

You mean other than the fact that it has cost millions of jobs already, cost millions of others to lose their health insurance in their jobs, and cost still millions of others to have their hours cut back? You mean other than the fact that Obama lies to the American people and said it would cost "$800 billion" when in fact he knew it would cost $2 trillion?

You mean other than those things? Gee, I don't know how anyone could determine it is a "colossal failure" other than those things.

TBH, I don't know if the affected people have reached the millions yet. It might only be in the 100's of thousands. I don't want to exaggerate this. The reality is bad enough. By the time it's all over it could be in the millions.

(If you have seen estimates of millions already, I would like to see. I just know that I've only seen 100's of 1000's so far.)

If they've lost their insurance, it was the insurance company that refused to comply with the requirements of ACA. You saying you don't want to exaggerate this especially in discussion with Rot is downright laughable.

Which is more distasteful to you, not allowing big insurance to bankrupt you into oblivion when you have a loved one with a catastrophic illness or losing your insurance when you lose your job? You all are good ones for complaints regarding paying for a poor person to be treated and yet big insurance made you pay over and over again for everyone elses misfortune.

Affordable care was desperately needed. Whether you and Rot agree is of no consequence anymore. It is law and it is fair.

They lost their insurance, which did not comply with Obamacare, because the insurance company refused to comply with Obamacare. If that was what happened they wouldn't have lost their insurance.

Tell me something is your head inside out?

 

[tinydancer]

You want layoffs?

Since your op is false I see in order to keep the thread going you have changed the subject.

I've been led astray Sgt, it happens you know, threads evolve and change, soon, not many remember the original topic or why they came here in the first place. Now, about my op... what was it again?

I'm not going to blame you for running with this story. Seemed credible. But holy toledo Jarretts assistant?

I think that is who he made this up.And everyone ran for "scandal".

This is just plain wrong.