mattskramer
Senior Member
1. Please with yet another straw man.
It is not a straw man. I merely paraphrased your comment. We agree that in some cases speech may lead to violence against the speaker for which the speaker is partially to blame being that a judge probably will not order full compensation to the injured speaker. Yet, there are instances in which a speaker is not to be blamed at all for violence made against him. As I asked, is a smoker to be blamed at all for being violently attacked if he were to say that it is okay to smoke.
2. Ditto. The Bible codifies sins.
So what is your point? Let us pretend that I agree with that statement. Should be make it illegal for people to sin? Will you answer my questions?
3. Please with the pure logic: this is politics, and perception is the reality.
If you cant back up your position with relevant facts, statistics, and logic, then you have noting.