What are you babbling about? Bush offered to allow the Congress to ask anything ( within the specific scope of the issue) and his aides would be required to answer.
Now if you mean Bush should just allow Congress to go on a fishing expedition about anything and everything, your high.
ALLOW? Who the fuck do you think Bush is? Congress doesn't need to be told what it can ask when they have the right to do so. It is you who are high if you think that the Representatives of the various districts and the Senators of the various states are going to allow George Bush to define the terms of Congressional hearings. This is why they issue subpoenas and required that the testimony be under oath. Members of Congress have to go back to their districts and States and as a result are more accessible to those who they pretend to represent. If a person wants to talk to his State Senator or his Representative he would only have to drive a few miles to his District Office to get answers. That is the substance of democracy which our system tends to undermine and it is one of the last hold-outs for those who love freedom, democracy and representation. Districts are too large as it is but at least a lot of people can still get a face to face meeting with their Senator or Representative and many of them know them personally. I applaud Congress for saying to the stranger from Crawford, Texas who calls himself George that they won't let the people of their towns and states be without a voice. My response to what you have said is for CONGRESS TO ISSUE SUBPOENAS AND IF BUSH REFUSES TO ALLOW THOSE WHO WORK FOR THE AMERICAN PEOPLE AND WHO ARE GIVING HIM ADVICE TO ALSO ANSWER TO US THAN CONGRESS SHOULD HOLD THEM IN CONTEMPT OF CONGRESS AND BY EXTENSION THE AMERICAN PEOPLE AND IF THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH WON'T PROSECUTE THEM THAN CONGRESS SHOULD SEND THE SERGEANT AT ARMS TO ARREST THEM, BRING THEM TO CONGRESS AND TO HOLD THEM ACCOUNTABLE UNTIL THEY ANSWER TO OUR NEIGHBORS. I AM SURE THAT THEY WON'T LIKE BEING LOCKED IN A SENATE OFFICE.