God Help Us All, Obama's Final Assault On America Begins: Lorretta Lynch As Scalia's Replacement

[CrusaderFrank]

He'll appoint someone neutral, so the repubs will have some explaining to do, if they reject him or her....

That would be the smart thing to do imo.

Neutral

LOL

 

[Preacher]

Course those that find this funny as the same ones that hate the US Constitution.

Prove me wrong. What would you do if you had the chance to with the 2nd amendment? Hm?

 

[Uncensored2008]

With Scalia out of the way, she will be able to allow Obama to complete his fundamental transformation of America before his term ends. Ladies and gentlemen, the final assault on our Republic has begun.


SCOTUS Expert: Loretta Lynch 'Most Likely' to Replace Scalia

Zero chance of that corrupt POS winning confirmation.

 

[Preacher]

He'll appoint someone neutral, so the repubs will have some explaining to do, if they reject him or her....

That would be the smart thing to do imo.

Neutral

LOL

People are dreaming if they think Obama won't take this chance to appoint the most radical leftists he can find. Goodbye Free speech,Goodbye 2nd amendment.

 

[Uncensored2008]

He'll appoint someone neutral, so the repubs will have some explaining to do, if they reject him or her....

That would be the smart thing to do imo.

Neutral like Al Sharpton?

 

[RandallFlagg]

He'll appoint someone neutral, so the repubs will have some explaining to do, if they reject him or her....

That would be the smart thing to do imo.

Neutral like Al Sharpton?

Jesse Jackson has been real quiet since his Son went "up the river" so, wouldn't surprise me in the least....or how about Jeremiah Wright?

 

[Uncensored2008]

People are dreaming if they think Obama won't take this chance to appoint the most radical leftists he can find. Goodbye Free speech,Goodbye 2nd amendment.

Obama can only nominate. The Senate must confirm, and they won't confirm Lynch. The Senate is in recess, so it will be a month before he can even float a name.

 

[ClosedCaption]

You know, as much as I cringe at the thought of prison camps for these America hating, hippie wannabe assholes, eventually it might have to come to that.

These repubs sure know how to whip themselves up into a froth using their own strawmen.

He wants to put people in prison for their political leanings AND THEN says liberals hate America. Waka Waka....Irony Fairy in the house

 

[RandallFlagg]

People are dreaming if they think Obama won't take this chance to appoint the most radical leftists he can find. Goodbye Free speech,Goodbye 2nd amendment.

Obama can only nominate. The Senate must confirm, and they won't confirm Lynch. The Senate is in recess, so it will be a month before he can even float a name.

...and remember, once they are back, it will be necessary for McConnell to keep the Senate in session for the rest of the year - which, by rule, cannot be closed until the Majority ends the session and would thus allow the "KING" to sneak an appointment through the back door. McConnell is a dumbass, to be sure, but he's not stupid.

 

[RandallFlagg]

You know, as much as I cringe at the thought of prison camps for these America hating, hippie wannabe assholes, eventually it might have to come to that.

These repubs sure know how to whip themselves up into a froth using their own strawmen.

He wants to put people in prison for their political leanings AND THEN says liberals hate America. Waka Waka....Irony Fairy in the house

And apparently, you are incapable of reading and comprehending the English language. I guess, however, that it's not your fault...you are a product of the public school system.

 

[Disir]

With Scalia out of the way, she will be able to allow Obama to complete his fundamental transformation of America before his term ends. Ladies and gentlemen, the final assault on our Republic has begun.


SCOTUS Expert: Loretta Lynch 'Most Likely' to Replace Scalia

He could knowing she wouldn't be accepted. There is that. It would seem like a waste of time.

 

[S.J.]

Obama will circumvent the Constitution to get another radical on the court.

 

[Disir]

Everything I'm seeing says Obama wants it to be Sri Srinivasan. There will be all sorts of names thrown out there

The push for Sri Srinivasan started with a guy named Toobin from back in 2013. Not that others would not have put his name out there but that is who immediately put his name back out there again.

 

[RandallFlagg]

Obama will circumvent the Constitution to get another radical on the court.

Hopefully no. He will be seen as the tyrant the he actually is and there is no way in hell that it will stand.

 

[Disir]

Obama will circumvent the Constitution to get another radical on the court.

{{meta.pageTitle}}
Who Is Sri Srinivasan, Obama's "Supreme Court Nominee in Waiting"?
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/10/us/politics/sri-srinivasan-gets-strong-push-for-appeals-court.html
Sri Srinivasan: A Seat on the Bench | Stanford Law School
Get to Know a Judge: Sri Srinivasan

Can you provide a legitimate argument against this guy?

 

[S.J.]

Obama will circumvent the Constitution to get another radical on the court.

Hopefully no. He will be seen as the tyrant the he actually is and there is no way in hell that it will stand.

Then get ready because he's proven repeatedly he will do whatever the hell he wants. He's not trying to hide who he really is anymore because what does he have to lose? He doesn't care what Americans think of him, he hates Americans. He's declared war in his last year and it's gonna be one nuclear bomb after the next thrown at us from every angle possible.

 

[RandallFlagg]

Obama will circumvent the Constitution to get another radical on the court.

{{meta.pageTitle}}
Who Is Sri Srinivasan, Obama's "Supreme Court Nominee in Waiting"?
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/10/us/politics/sri-srinivasan-gets-strong-push-for-appeals-court.html
Sri Srinivasan: A Seat on the Bench | Stanford Law School
Get to Know a Judge: Sri Srinivasan

Can you provide a legitimate argument against this guy?

Can you provide a legitimate argument FOR this guy?

 

[Disir]

Obama will circumvent the Constitution to get another radical on the court.

{{meta.pageTitle}}
Who Is Sri Srinivasan, Obama's "Supreme Court Nominee in Waiting"?
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/10/us/politics/sri-srinivasan-gets-strong-push-for-appeals-court.html
Sri Srinivasan: A Seat on the Bench | Stanford Law School
Get to Know a Judge: Sri Srinivasan

Can you provide a legitimate argument against this guy?

Can you provide a legitimate argument FOR this guy?

After graduating Stanford Law School in 1995, Srinivasan started working as a law clerk for two Republican-appointed judges. The first was Judge J. Harvie Wilkinson III, who was nominated to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals by Ronald Reagan. Although Wilkinson was considered Republican, he expressed bipartisanship in his personal views, most notably in an Op-Ed for the New York Times. After that, Srinivasan worked as a law clerk for Supreme Court Associate Justice Sandra Day O'Connor. Many viewed O'Connor as a moderate Conservative, but in her latter years she often had the swing vote, which made her more bipartisan. That means Srinivasan's early exposure to a legal career was largely nonpartisan, despite working with two judges who had fairly conservative beliefs.

Working Under George W. Bush
For five years, Srinivasan worked under the George W. Bush Justice Department. Bush stayed true to conservatism throughout his eight-year term, which proved to be a partisan experience for Srinivasan during his time under his Justice Department. However, many of the connections Srinivasan made while working for Bush helped get him appointed to the D.C. Circuit. According to the New York Times, Paul D. Clement and Theodore B. Olson, both solicitors general under Bush, sent a letter of support when Srinivasan was nominated for the D.C. Circuit.

Anti-Human Rights Defense
When Srinivasan worked for O'Melveny & Myers LLP, he defended Exxon Mobil in a lawsuit they faced for human rights violations abroad. During this private-sector work, Srinivasan argued that Exxon Mobil shouldn't be held accountable for these violations when they took place outside of the U.S. However, Liberals were not happy with Srinivasan's decision because of the severity of this lawsuit; an Indonesian village accused Exxon Mobil Corp's security forces of torture, murder, and other violations against their people. Similarly, Srinivasan successfully represented a newspaper publisher that fired its employees for unionizing against the publisher's biased interference in its reporting. He also defended Enron President Jeffrey Skilling, who was later convicted in a significant financial fraud. After these defense cases, Liberals weren't sure if Srinivasan shared their views, especially with regards to human rights.

Liberal Work Under Obama
Bustle

^^^read the entire article. Can you provide a viable argument against this man?

 

[RandallFlagg]

Obama will circumvent the Constitution to get another radical on the court.

{{meta.pageTitle}}
Who Is Sri Srinivasan, Obama's "Supreme Court Nominee in Waiting"?
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/10/us/politics/sri-srinivasan-gets-strong-push-for-appeals-court.html
Sri Srinivasan: A Seat on the Bench | Stanford Law School
Get to Know a Judge: Sri Srinivasan

Can you provide a legitimate argument against this guy?

Can you provide a legitimate argument FOR this guy?

After graduating Stanford Law School in 1995, Srinivasan started working as a law clerk for two Republican-appointed judges. The first was Judge J. Harvie Wilkinson III, who was nominated to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals by Ronald Reagan. Although Wilkinson was considered Republican, he expressed bipartisanship in his personal views, most notably in an Op-Ed for the New York Times. After that, Srinivasan worked as a law clerk for Supreme Court Associate Justice Sandra Day O'Connor. Many viewed O'Connor as a moderate Conservative, but in her latter years she often had the swing vote, which made her more bipartisan. That means Srinivasan's early exposure to a legal career was largely nonpartisan, despite working with two judges who had fairly conservative beliefs.

Working Under George W. Bush
For five years, Srinivasan worked under the George W. Bush Justice Department. Bush stayed true to conservatism throughout his eight-year term, which proved to be a partisan experience for Srinivasan during his time under his Justice Department. However, many of the connections Srinivasan made while working for Bush helped get him appointed to the D.C. Circuit. According to the New York Times, Paul D. Clement and Theodore B. Olson, both solicitors general under Bush, sent a letter of support when Srinivasan was nominated for the D.C. Circuit.

Anti-Human Rights Defense
When Srinivasan worked for O'Melveny & Myers LLP, he defended Exxon Mobil in a lawsuit they faced for human rights violations abroad. During this private-sector work, Srinivasan argued that Exxon Mobil shouldn't be held accountable for these violations when they took place outside of the U.S. However, Liberals were not happy with Srinivasan's decision because of the severity of this lawsuit; an Indonesian village accused Exxon Mobil Corp's security forces of torture, murder, and other violations against their people. Similarly, Srinivasan successfully represented a newspaper publisher that fired its employees for unionizing against the publisher's biased interference in its reporting. He also defended Enron President Jeffrey Skilling, who was later convicted in a significant financial fraud. After these defense cases, Liberals weren't sure if Srinivasan shared their views, especially with regards to human rights.

Liberal Work Under Obama
Bustle

^^^read the entire article. Can you provide a viable argument against this man?

Absolutely. No problem. He will not get past the Senate. How's that? Right now, that's the only argument that matters. Once the next republican president is in power, he will get whomever he wants in. Until then, the point is moot.

 

[Disir]

Obama will circumvent the Constitution to get another radical on the court.

{{meta.pageTitle}}
Who Is Sri Srinivasan, Obama's "Supreme Court Nominee in Waiting"?
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/10/us/politics/sri-srinivasan-gets-strong-push-for-appeals-court.html
Sri Srinivasan: A Seat on the Bench | Stanford Law School
Get to Know a Judge: Sri Srinivasan

Can you provide a legitimate argument against this guy?

Can you provide a legitimate argument FOR this guy?

After graduating Stanford Law School in 1995, Srinivasan started working as a law clerk for two Republican-appointed judges. The first was Judge J. Harvie Wilkinson III, who was nominated to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals by Ronald Reagan. Although Wilkinson was considered Republican, he expressed bipartisanship in his personal views, most notably in an Op-Ed for the New York Times. After that, Srinivasan worked as a law clerk for Supreme Court Associate Justice Sandra Day O'Connor. Many viewed O'Connor as a moderate Conservative, but in her latter years she often had the swing vote, which made her more bipartisan. That means Srinivasan's early exposure to a legal career was largely nonpartisan, despite working with two judges who had fairly conservative beliefs.

Working Under George W. Bush
For five years, Srinivasan worked under the George W. Bush Justice Department. Bush stayed true to conservatism throughout his eight-year term, which proved to be a partisan experience for Srinivasan during his time under his Justice Department. However, many of the connections Srinivasan made while working for Bush helped get him appointed to the D.C. Circuit. According to the New York Times, Paul D. Clement and Theodore B. Olson, both solicitors general under Bush, sent a letter of support when Srinivasan was nominated for the D.C. Circuit.

Anti-Human Rights Defense
When Srinivasan worked for O'Melveny & Myers LLP, he defended Exxon Mobil in a lawsuit they faced for human rights violations abroad. During this private-sector work, Srinivasan argued that Exxon Mobil shouldn't be held accountable for these violations when they took place outside of the U.S. However, Liberals were not happy with Srinivasan's decision because of the severity of this lawsuit; an Indonesian village accused Exxon Mobil Corp's security forces of torture, murder, and other violations against their people. Similarly, Srinivasan successfully represented a newspaper publisher that fired its employees for unionizing against the publisher's biased interference in its reporting. He also defended Enron President Jeffrey Skilling, who was later convicted in a significant financial fraud. After these defense cases, Liberals weren't sure if Srinivasan shared their views, especially with regards to human rights.

Liberal Work Under Obama
Bustle

^^^read the entire article. Can you provide a viable argument against this man?

Absolutely. No problem. He will not get past the Senate. How's that? Right now, that's the only argument that matters. Once the next republican president is in power, he will get whomever he wants in. Until then, the point is moot.

Ok. You don't have one. Thank you for your time.