SSDD
Gold Member
- Nov 6, 2012
- 16,672
- 1,966
- 280
]No that's not what he said. He said that it was a turbulence problem(already with just 3 blades)While 4 or more blades of the same size gives more power than 3, it's not much more. More blades means more turbulence created, so each additional blade gives diminishing returns. More blades would be more weight, so they'd have to be smaller, as the hub can only support so much weight. 3 larger blades gives more power than 4 or more smaller blades.
All well stated. Just to further strengthen the point:
According to Betz's law, a wind turbine can harvest at most 59.3% of the kinetic energy of the wind. Modern turbines (3 blades) reap something in the order of 50%. That serves to show that the added gains with more blades would be minuscule, while adding further strains on the system, predominantly at higher wind speeds, resulting in way higher costs, as you've pointed out.
I said there is not & showed him why not and now you come along after you made yourself an instant expert because you got wifi and pretend to know something about aerodynamics just like him or her, who knows these days. Either one of you is brain dead the moment your wifi goes down
Typical know nothing warmer...how smart can they be...I mean, they have fallen for one of the biggest hoaxes ever...history will put them on the same shelf with people who accepted phrenology, and bleeding as high science.