Global Warming: The BIGGEST LIE Exposed

[Wry Catcher]

For current information on the issue of climate, please see:

It's Clear Humans Are Changing World's Climate, Panel Says : The Two-Way : NPR

 

[westwall]

For current information on the issue of climate, please see:

It's Clear Humans Are Changing World's Climate, Panel Says : The Two-Way : NPR

No, that's called propaganda. Get the terms right.

 

[mamooth]

The fence sitters though...they are the ones who are reading these threads and coming over to our side.

Oh my. You really are off in your own little kook unreality bubble.

Go on any MSM site with a AGW story and the comments are OVERWHELMINGLY on the skeptical side now.

The fact that the crazy stupid people are getting crazier does not prove what you think it does. Look at you cranks here. In your ever-increasing hysteria, you're all posting more and more crank nonsense, but that doesn't mean you've convinced anyone. It just means that as your 'tard cult shrinks, you all get more desperate.

 

[mamooth]

Actually, the data say exactly the opposite: it was a global phenomenon. Where did you get the idea the data said if was limited to Europe, from that fraud Michael Mann?

Bri, maybe you're right. Maybe the entire world really is in on a vast socialist conspiracy, and only your tiny group of bitter 'tard fringe cultists knows the RealTruth.

Of course, back in the real world, any theory that declares a vast global conspiracy to hide the truth is a crank conspiracy theory. That's all Bri has, endless 'tard ravings about the vast global socialist conspiracy. 9/11 Truthers and Moon Landing Hoaxers look rather sane compared to Bri, being how the conspiracies they propose are much smaller in scale.

 

[flacaltenn]

I believe you're talking America alone...Not world wide. 1930's were hot during the 30s for America.

America had, and could again, the most extensive weather station coverage on the planet, so yes that was for America... but as has been shown with the MWP, the odds are that it was a global phenomena...

The odds are NOT that it was a global phenomenon because the data quite clearly say otherwise.

I love the way you and yours demand that every jot and tittle for data/studies/info that contradicts your opinion but play Loosey-Goosey, the Master's Version, when you think it supports your twisted ideas.

And you the Man of Science hereabouts...

Yourr evidence for that belief is a tortured fabrication of a phoney GLOBAL AVERAGE. Its based on various SPARSE CRAPPPYproxies. Kind of like a haggus...

Weve done this several times. The best you can do with what you got is to look at the proxy studies themselves without making organ sausage out of the crap left on the ground,

When u do that there is OVERWHEMING EVIDENCE that MWP was a significant GLOBAL event. Ur hero MANN had to ignore the dozens of global studies to lie about it.


Spare me the pretend global averages and show me proxy studies from asia that cant find MWP signature.

 

[mamooth]

Yourr evidence for that belief is a tortured fabrication of a phoney GLOBAL AVERAGE. Its based on various SPARSE CRAPPPYproxies. Kind of like a haggus...

You're losing it, flac. All you can do now is invoke the great conspiracy, and then engage in frantic cherrypicking.

Spare me the pretend global averages and show me proxy studies from asia that cant find MWP signature.

No prob. See, that's what's great about having the data on your side. We just have to post the actual data to "win". No conspiracies or cherrypicking required.

Continental-scale temperature variability during the past two millennia : Nature Geoscience : Nature Publishing Group

That's the 2013 Pages2K study, a collaboration of 60 scientific institutes around the globe to recreate the past 2000 years of global temperature. It covers the whole globe except Africa, where the proxies were too sparse. It's a bit hard to read, but the error-bar graph there below the colored line graphs are what the study found, that the current global average temps are much higher than the MWP temps.

Naturally, since it disagrees with you, you'll tell us it has to be all wrong. Since demonizing Mann won't work here, that will make it more difficult for you. Was the entire planet in on a vast deception here?

 

[bripat9643]

America had, and could again, the most extensive weather station coverage on the planet, so yes that was for America... but as has been shown with the MWP, the odds are that it was a global phenomena...

The odds are NOT that it was a global phenomenon because the data quite clearly say otherwise.

I love the way you and yours demand that every jot and tittle for data/studies/info that contradicts your opinion but play Loosey-Goosey, the Master's Version, when you think it supports your twisted ideas.

And you the Man of Science hereabouts...

You guys have claimed all along that the MWP was a "localized event" and now, after more than 100 peer review papers have shown that no, it was very clearly a global event you guys are still ignoring that data.

Who are the science deniers here? Oh yeah...it's YOU!

They still claim the Hockey Stick is accurate.

Talk about delusional.

 

[bripat9643]

The fence sitters though...they are the ones who are reading these threads and coming over to our side.

Oh my. You really are off in your own little kook unreality bubble.

Go on any MSM site with a AGW story and the comments are OVERWHELMINGLY on the skeptical side now.

The fact that the crazy stupid people are getting crazier does not prove what you think it does. Look at you cranks here. In your ever-increasing hysteria, you're all posting more and more crank nonsense, but that doesn't mean you've convinced anyone. It just means that as your 'tard cult shrinks, you all get more desperate.

Yes indeed, look at the cranks in here. They are all members of the warmist Holy Church of Anthropogenic Global Warming.

 

[ScienceRocks]

The odds are NOT that it was a global phenomenon because the data quite clearly say otherwise.

I love the way you and yours demand that every jot and tittle for data/studies/info that contradicts your opinion but play Loosey-Goosey, the Master's Version, when you think it supports your twisted ideas.

And you the Man of Science hereabouts...

You guys have claimed all along that the MWP was a "localized event" and now, after more than 100 peer review papers have shown that no, it was very clearly a global event you guys are still ignoring that data.

Who are the science deniers here? Oh yeah...it's YOU!

They still claim the Hockey Stick is accurate.

Talk about delusional.

About ten other data sets back it up The only data set saying other wise is a northeastern Atlantic/Europe graph made 30 years ago.

 

[bripat9643]

You guys have claimed all along that the MWP was a "localized event" and now, after more than 100 peer review papers have shown that no, it was very clearly a global event you guys are still ignoring that data.

Who are the science deniers here? Oh yeah...it's YOU!

They still claim the Hockey Stick is accurate.

Talk about delusional.

About ten other data sets back it up The only data set saying other wise is a northeastern Atlantic/Europe graph made 30 years ago.

All the studies that supposedly back it up were done by Michael Mann's cronies, and they use the same discredited methods and the same discredited Bristle Cone Pine tree ring proxies that Mann used.

For more information refer to Climate Audit

 

[mamooth]

Bri, when I point out how crazy people spam-post, spam-posting denials may not be the best response.

And when we point out you're a cultist, quoting kook conspiracies from Climate Fraudit, the Holy Writ of DearLeaderMcIntyre, may also not be the best response.

 

[westwall]

You guys have claimed all along that the MWP was a "localized event" and now, after more than 100 peer review papers have shown that no, it was very clearly a global event you guys are still ignoring that data.

Who are the science deniers here? Oh yeah...it's YOU!

They still claim the Hockey Stick is accurate.

Talk about delusional.

About ten other data sets back it up The only data set saying other wise is a northeastern Atlantic/Europe graph made 30 years ago.

Of course they do Matt they used the same data sets and the same methodologies. Which, when tested, gave a hockey stick NO MATTER WHAT NUMBERS YOU ENTERED INTO THE ALGORITHM.

That's not science dude.

 

[skookerasbil]

Hanging in this forum is like hanging on 12 North of the local hospital. The level of thought process disorder is profound. Its fascinating.

The whole "denialist" thing.......as if it is having even a smidge of effect on the public perceptions. Im struggling to find a good analogy.

Not one single climate crusader on here has been able to produce one single link displaying how the "consensus" crowd is winning!! Not fucking one.


For all their hysterics over the past 20 years.......how much have they moved the bar in terms of effect on governments worldwide changing energy policy??

[/URL][/IMG]

 

[PMZ]

Why do I even bother to start these threads?

The same posters are going to drag out the same propaganda and nobody is going to ever change their minds.

You can't change their minds Longknife......they are either religious fanatics or monetarily dependent on the fraud continuing. The fence sitters though...they are the ones who are reading these threads and coming over to our side.

Go on any MSM site with a AGW story and the comments are OVERWHELMINGLY on the skeptical side now. Five years ago that was not true. We are winning, and these drones are helping us to win. Regular folks come on and see them spewing the same old crap and they see how we present new, current studies and they are coming over to our side.

Keep up the good work!

Science is the search for the truth. The IPCC has found and utilized a great deal in the field of climate science. What would compel anyone with an understanding of what's been proven to be true, to even consider a wild ass guess with absolutely no evidence behind it? Are people searching for an alternative explanation for gravity? Or calculus? Or the multiplication tables?

 

[PMZ]

For current information on the issue of climate, please see:

It's Clear Humans Are Changing World's Climate, Panel Says : The Two-Way : NPR

No, that's called propaganda. Get the terms right.

If you can't tell the difference between science and propaganda you'd better not leave the house.

Oh, wait a minute, not leaving the house is why you can't tell the difference.

 

[PMZ]

America had, and could again, the most extensive weather station coverage on the planet, so yes that was for America... but as has been shown with the MWP, the odds are that it was a global phenomena...

The odds are NOT that it was a global phenomenon because the data quite clearly say otherwise.

I love the way you and yours demand that every jot and tittle for data/studies/info that contradicts your opinion but play Loosey-Goosey, the Master's Version, when you think it supports your twisted ideas.

And you the Man of Science hereabouts...

Yourr evidence for that belief is a tortured fabrication of a phoney GLOBAL AVERAGE. Its based on various SPARSE CRAPPPYproxies. Kind of like a haggus...

Weve done this several times. The best you can do with what you got is to look at the proxy studies themselves without making organ sausage out of the crap left on the ground,

When u do that there is OVERWHEMING EVIDENCE that MWP was a significant GLOBAL event. Ur hero MANN had to ignore the dozens of global studies to lie about it.


Spare me the pretend global averages and show me proxy studies from asia that cant find MWP signature.

MWP is over. AGW is today.

 

[skookerasbil]

The odds are NOT that it was a global phenomenon because the data quite clearly say otherwise.

I love the way you and yours demand that every jot and tittle for data/studies/info that contradicts your opinion but play Loosey-Goosey, the Master's Version, when you think it supports your twisted ideas.

And you the Man of Science hereabouts...

Yourr evidence for that belief is a tortured fabrication of a phoney GLOBAL AVERAGE. Its based on various SPARSE CRAPPPYproxies. Kind of like a haggus...

Weve done this several times. The best you can do with what you got is to look at the proxy studies themselves without making organ sausage out of the crap left on the ground,

When u do that there is OVERWHEMING EVIDENCE that MWP was a significant GLOBAL event. Ur hero MANN had to ignore the dozens of global studies to lie about it.


Spare me the pretend global averages and show me proxy studies from asia that cant find MWP signature.

MWP is over. AGW is today.

And HERE is tomorrow s0n >>>>

10 predictions for the world's energy future » News » OPB


Nobody is caring about the science. All it does is make a few people mega-wealthy on the bogusness of green energy and provide careers for some scientists. Nothing else.

 

[Abraham3]

10 predictions for the world's energy future » News » OPB[/URL]


Nobody is caring about the science. All it does is make a few people mega-wealthy on the bogusness of green energy and provide careers for some scientists. Nothing else.

Your linked predictions were from 2011. Odd that you should go to an Oregon news blog to get a government publication. Be that as it may, I would say that the prediction was accurate so far. There is nothing in it that surprises or amazes. Did you actually have any point to make or is this one or your more typical posts?

 

[skookerasbil]

10 predictions for the world's energy future » News » OPB[/URL]


Nobody is caring about the science. All it does is make a few people mega-wealthy on the bogusness of green energy and provide careers for some scientists. Nothing else.

Your linked predictions were from 2011. Odd that you should go to an Oregon news blog to get a government publication. Be that as it may, I would say that the prediction was accurate so far. There is nothing in it that surprises or amazes. Did you actually have any point to make or is this one or your more typical posts?

all the k00k lefties are more concerned about form as compared to function......and then they always go to the red herring tactic of referencing the date of your link.....in this case, as if a couple of years gone by changes energy projections in any significant way!!


fAiL


worth posting up again >>>>

10 predictions for the world's energy future » News » OPB


Actually s0n......I was glad to come upon this link, a concise summary of future energy projections by our own government. You'll be seeing it a lot s0n!!! My role in this forum is keeping it all real.

 

[editec]

I cannot believe that people get angry with one another over this issue.

Not one person here is an expert, not one person here owns the data or the conclusions from that data, either.

Ya'll need to ask yourselves why you are taking this issue so damned personally.

There either is global warming or there isn't.

What you or I believe, or who wins the argument (nobody here is knowledgeable enough to have an actual DEBATE on this subject) makes like ZERO difference to REALITY.