washamericom
Gold Member
- Jun 19, 2010
- 13,703
- 1,904
- 245
- Banned
- #1
i just heard a JPL scientist say we are able to study and see "if what we think we can understand is correct"
and that will help develop models for the future. Home Page - Deep Space Network
and this is fine, i am really glad they are studying and playing with computer models. i don't want this to replace the space program.
however, when they start pushing global warming as a liberal agenda, that where i step off the train.
if people like al gore use junk science and cooked data to the ends of wealth and power, i have a political problem with that. and i have also rebelled against the using of taxpayer money to use the corporation for public broadcasting to sell this story, especially to our children,
global warming is not a consensus, it's new science, the data is either wrong or inconclusive.
this is going to be a big political football, it's time to look at this objectively. the summit in france coming up will be a whirlwind of political posturing. carbon credits are a joke. they are a vehicle to controlling industry and the economy. let's stay focused on the environment polution and population, and not one more red cent to that fear monger hypocrite al gore.
if what we think we can understand is correct... that will be five billion dollars please.
The Alarming Cost Of Climate Change Hysteria
According to the GAO, annual federal climate spending has increased from $4.6 billion in 2003 to $8.8 billion in 2010, amounting to $106.7 billion over that period. The money was spent in four general categories: technology to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, science to understand climate changes, international assistance for developing countries, and wildlife adaptation to respond to actual or expected changes. Technology spending, the largest category, grew from $2.56 billion to $5.5 billion over this period, increasingly advancing over others in total share. Data compiled by Joanne Novaat the Science and Policy Institute indicates that the U.S. Government spent more than $32.5 billion on climate studies between 1989 and 2009. This doesn’t count about $79 billion more spent for climate change technology research, foreign aid and tax breaks for “green energy.”
'Dark Money' Funds To Promote Global Warming Alarmism Dwarf Warming 'Denier' Research
money spent studying global warming - Google Search
with all the problems in the world, they are bilking people so we can control the weather ?
what about all the weather people, won't they lose their jobs ?
incidentally, the poll question doesn't ask if you believe in the "science" only if it's a political issue this election for you, it is for me, thanks to people like gore and obama.
i don't think it's a priority or a bigger threat than isis for example, which is far less nebulous and obscure, and politically obfuscated for $$ and political control.
and that will help develop models for the future. Home Page - Deep Space Network
and this is fine, i am really glad they are studying and playing with computer models. i don't want this to replace the space program.
however, when they start pushing global warming as a liberal agenda, that where i step off the train.
if people like al gore use junk science and cooked data to the ends of wealth and power, i have a political problem with that. and i have also rebelled against the using of taxpayer money to use the corporation for public broadcasting to sell this story, especially to our children,
global warming is not a consensus, it's new science, the data is either wrong or inconclusive.
this is going to be a big political football, it's time to look at this objectively. the summit in france coming up will be a whirlwind of political posturing. carbon credits are a joke. they are a vehicle to controlling industry and the economy. let's stay focused on the environment polution and population, and not one more red cent to that fear monger hypocrite al gore.
if what we think we can understand is correct... that will be five billion dollars please.
The Alarming Cost Of Climate Change Hysteria
According to the GAO, annual federal climate spending has increased from $4.6 billion in 2003 to $8.8 billion in 2010, amounting to $106.7 billion over that period. The money was spent in four general categories: technology to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, science to understand climate changes, international assistance for developing countries, and wildlife adaptation to respond to actual or expected changes. Technology spending, the largest category, grew from $2.56 billion to $5.5 billion over this period, increasingly advancing over others in total share. Data compiled by Joanne Novaat the Science and Policy Institute indicates that the U.S. Government spent more than $32.5 billion on climate studies between 1989 and 2009. This doesn’t count about $79 billion more spent for climate change technology research, foreign aid and tax breaks for “green energy.”
'Dark Money' Funds To Promote Global Warming Alarmism Dwarf Warming 'Denier' Research
money spent studying global warming - Google Search
with all the problems in the world, they are bilking people so we can control the weather ?
what about all the weather people, won't they lose their jobs ?
incidentally, the poll question doesn't ask if you believe in the "science" only if it's a political issue this election for you, it is for me, thanks to people like gore and obama.
i don't think it's a priority or a bigger threat than isis for example, which is far less nebulous and obscure, and politically obfuscated for $$ and political control.
Last edited:
