More insane and thoroughly debunked denier cult myths and crackpot conspiracy theories, as usual from ol' BoobyBobNutJob.
Only bamboozled denier cult retards are still deluded enough to think that so-called 'climategate' was anything but a phony 'scandal' cooked up by the fossil fuel industry propagandists.
<snip - Fiar use of Copyrighted material>
One. The Emails were in a file that was collected due to demands of a court for Freedom Of Information Law violation in Britain.
Two. That file was placed on a public server with public access.
Three. It was found by out side sources and copied, the university warned and the contents released as it was on a PUBLIC SERVER.
There was no theft involved.
There was no privacy considerations involved..
You guys really need to get your facts straight!
And your inability to use civil discourse and name calling is noted.. This usually is a signal that you give up and concede but do not have the fortitude to do so..
I don't see where Rolling Thunder said anything about thefts or privacy.
However, would you care to provide a source for your contention that the stolen mails were being stored on a publicly accessible server. Wikipedia's article states
"The University of East Anglia stated that
the server from which the data were taken was not one that could be accessed easily, and that the data could not have been released inadvertently.[19]
Norfolk Police later added that the
offenders used methods that are common in unlawful internet activity, designed to obstruct later enquiries.[5]
The breach was first discovered on 17 November 2009
after the server of the RealClimate website was also hacked and a copy of the stolen data was uploaded there.[20]
RealClimate's Gavin Schmidt said that he
had information that the files had been obtained through "a hack into [CRU's] backup mail server."[21]
So, again, I'd like to see the source of your contention that these mails were simply lifted from a publicly accessible server.