Give a man a fish.......

Give a man a fish and he will eat for a day, teach a man to fish and he will eat for a lifetime

This is one of the cornerstones of conservatism today. Self determination. No "free stuff". Who could have a problem with such a basic principle of society? Why don't Liberals get it?

But what happens when there are no fish where you live?
What happens if you can't afford a pole, tackle and a license?
What happens when you go to fish and are told......."Only members are allowed to fish here"

This is where government comes in. The idea that once you have taught people to fish, your job is done does not always work in a society. Sometimes we need government to break dowmn barriers to fishing

The things you listed such as licenses were government created. Did you know only rich people can have broadcast licenses? Consider the fact that they cost at least a million dollars a piece.
 
Give a man a fish and he will eat for a day, teach a man to fish and he will eat for a lifetime

This is one of the cornerstones of conservatism today. Self determination. No "free stuff". Who could have a problem with such a basic principle of society? Why don't Liberals get it?

But what happens when there are no fish where you live?
What happens if you can't afford a pole, tackle and a license?
What happens when you go to fish and are told......."Only members are allowed to fish here"

This is where government comes in. The idea that once you have taught people to fish, your job is done does not always work in a society. Sometimes we need government to break dowmn barriers to fishing

The things you listed such as licenses were government created. Did you know only rich people can have broadcast licenses? Consider the fact that they cost at least a million dollars a piece.


regulations and licenses hurt the little guy and helps the big guy to keep the little guy down

the big guy can afford them or afford to work around them the little guy is forced out

who dares hunt in the kings forest
 
Give a man a fish and he will eat for a day, teach a man to fish and he will eat for a lifetime

This is one of the cornerstones of conservatism today. Self determination. No "free stuff". Who could have a problem with such a basic principle of society? Why don't Liberals get it?

But what happens when there are no fish where you live?
What happens if you can't afford a pole, tackle and a license?
What happens when you go to fish and are told......."Only members are allowed to fish here"

This is where government comes in. The idea that once you have taught people to fish, your job is done does not always work in a society. Sometimes we need government to break dowmn barriers to fishing

The things you listed such as licenses were government created. Did you know only rich people can have broadcast licenses? Consider the fact that they cost at least a million dollars a piece.


regulations and licenses hurt the little guy and helps the big guy to keep the little guy down

the big guy can afford them or afford to work around them the little guy is forced out

who dares hunt in the kings forest

Very true and supports the Golden Rule

He who has the gold, makes the rules
 
Republicans don't understand that ordering people to fish for their food is not the solution

Sometimes you have to restock the fishing hole first

Fish have to be available to stock the pond before it can be re-stocked. How much spare fish do you have sitting around?

You mean fish that are not being sent to China?

Ah yes ... China. That great nation that Clinton cozied up to and signed trade treaties with. Another golden accomplishment of the Democrat Party.
 
Republicans don't understand that ordering people to fish for their food is not the solution

Sometimes you have to restock the fishing hole first

Fish have to be available to stock the pond before it can be re-stocked. How much spare fish do you have sitting around?

You mean fish that are not being sent to China?

Ah yes ... China. That great nation that Clinton cozied up to and signed trade treaties with. Another golden accomplishment of the Democrat Party.
The nation that Bush got drunk in
 
Republicans don't understand that ordering people to fish for their food is not the solution

Sometimes you have to restock the fishing hole first

Fish have to be available to stock the pond before it can be re-stocked. How much spare fish do you have sitting around?

You mean fish that are not being sent to China?

Ah yes ... China. That great nation that Clinton cozied up to and signed trade treaties with. Another golden accomplishment of the Democrat Party.

Bill Clinton, the country's most ardent booster of opening trade with China [thanks to Clinton's Chinese donations in exchange for missile information we have the
FAMOUS Gorelick Memo that created the wall between FBI & CIA thus no knowledge of the 9/11 bombers shared with the FBI!!!], looks especially imprudent 10 years later.

During a press conference on March 29, 2000, Clinton said that granting China permanent normal trade relations (PNTR), which allowed China to gain entry into the WTO, would be a great deal for America. "We do nothing," Clinton said. "They have to lower tariffs. They open up telecommunications for investment. They allow us to sell cars made in America in China at much lower tariffs. They allow us to put our own distributorships there. They allow us to put our own parts there. We don't have to transfer technology or do joint manufacturing in China any more. This a hundred-to-nothing deal for America when it comes to the economic consequences."
China s Entry Into The WTO 10 Years Later Is Not What President Clinton Promised
 
Republicans don't understand that ordering people to fish for their food is not the solution

Sometimes you have to restock the fishing hole first

Fish have to be available to stock the pond before it can be re-stocked. How much spare fish do you have sitting around?

You mean fish that are not being sent to China?

Ah yes ... China. That great nation that Clinton cozied up to and signed trade treaties with. Another golden accomplishment of the Democrat Party.
The nation that Bush got drunk in

Hell ... wouldn't anyone want to get drunk if they had to spend time in a Communist country? But I guess getting drunk in China isn't as bad as Clinton and Obama smoking weed in the USA.
 
Republicans don't understand that ordering people to fish for their food is not the solution

Sometimes you have to restock the fishing hole first

Fish have to be available to stock the pond before it can be re-stocked. How much spare fish do you have sitting around?

You mean fish that are not being sent to China?

Ah yes ... China. That great nation that Clinton cozied up to and signed trade treaties with. Another golden accomplishment of the Democrat Party.

Bill Clinton, the country's most ardent booster of opening trade with China [thanks to Clinton's Chinese donations in exchange for missile information we have the
FAMOUS Gorelick Memo that created the wall between FBI & CIA thus no knowledge of the 9/11 bombers shared with the FBI!!!], looks especially imprudent 10 years later.

During a press conference on March 29, 2000, Clinton said that granting China permanent normal trade relations (PNTR), which allowed China to gain entry into the WTO, would be a great deal for America. "We do nothing," Clinton said. "They have to lower tariffs. They open up telecommunications for investment. They allow us to sell cars made in America in China at much lower tariffs. They allow us to put our own distributorships there. They allow us to put our own parts there. We don't have to transfer technology or do joint manufacturing in China any more. This a hundred-to-nothing deal for America when it comes to the economic consequences."
China s Entry Into The WTO 10 Years Later Is Not What President Clinton Promised

Good info. And NOW look at the mess we're in. China "owns" us economically speaking.
 
Give a man a fish and he will eat for a day, teach a man to fish and he will eat for a lifetime

This is one of the cornerstones of conservatism today. Self determination. No "free stuff". Who could have a problem with such a basic principle of society? Why don't Liberals get it?

But what happens when there are no fish where you live?
What happens if you can't afford a pole, tackle and a license?
What happens when you go to fish and are told......."Only members are allowed to fish here"

This is where government comes in. The idea that once you have taught people to fish, your job is done does not always work in a society. Sometimes we need government to break dowmn barriers to fishing

The things you listed such as licenses were government created. Did you know only rich people can have broadcast licenses? Consider the fact that they cost at least a million dollars a piece.


regulations and licenses hurt the little guy and helps the big guy to keep the little guy down

the big guy can afford them or afford to work around them the little guy is forced out

who dares hunt in the kings forest

Yes regulations and licensing


Can make it difficult to fish can't it?
 
The teach a man a fish to fish mantra is typical conservatism

Assume a perfect world and if the world is not, in fact, perfect...blame the victim

Not my fault if there are no fish left for you to catch




.
 
Give a man a fish and he will eat for a day, teach a man to fish and he will eat for a lifetime

This is one of the cornerstones of conservatism today. Self determination. No "free stuff". Who could have a problem with such a basic principle of society? Why don't Liberals get it?

But what happens when there are no fish where you live?
What happens if you can't afford a pole, tackle and a license?
What happens when you go to fish and are told......."Only members are allowed to fish here"

This is where government comes in. The idea that once you have taught people to fish, your job is done does not always work in a society. Sometimes we need government to break dowmn barriers to fishing

The liberal philosophy is take a fish from a man, shoot him in the head, and if he still manages to complain urinate on his body. Then his fish is taken from him by another man who thinks the same thing. Then the same thing happens to him. Eventually the only people that have any fishes is the guy strong enough to beat the hell out of everyone. Welcome to liberaltopia.
 
Give a man a fish and he will eat for a day, teach a man to fish and he will eat for a lifetime

This is one of the cornerstones of conservatism today. Self determination. No "free stuff". Who could have a problem with such a basic principle of society? Why don't Liberals get it?

But what happens when there are no fish where you live?
What happens if you can't afford a pole, tackle and a license?
What happens when you go to fish and are told......."Only members are allowed to fish here"

This is where government comes in. The idea that once you have taught people to fish, your job is done does not always work in a society. Sometimes we need government to break dowmn barriers to fishing

The liberal philosophy is take a fish from a man, shoot him in the head, and if he still manages to complain urinate on his body. Then his fish is taken from him by another man who thinks the same thing. Then the same thing happens to him. Eventually the only people that have any fishes is the guy strong enough to beat the hell out of everyone. Welcome to liberaltopia.

The conservative philosopy is to allow the wealthy to control the pond and reserve nine out of every ten fish for themselves and let everyone else fight over the remaining one fish....then they point to the person who ended up with no fish and call him lazy
 
The conservative philosopy is to allow the wealthy to control the pond and reserve nine out of every ten fish for themselves and let everyone else fight over the remaining one fish....then they point to the person who ended up with no fish and call him lazy
It looks like when a liberal fanatic can't refute what conservatives say, they lie about them instead, pretend they said something else, and bash them for that instead.

The hysteria and futility of these liberals is a wonder to behold.
 
The conservative philosopy is to allow the wealthy to control the pond and reserve nine out of every ten fish for themselves and let everyone else fight over the remaining one fish....then they point to the person who ended up with no fish and call him lazy
It looks like when a liberal fanatic can't refute what conservatives say, they lie about them instead, pretend they said something else, and bash them for that instead.

The hysteria and futility of these liberals is a wonder to behold.

Poor, poor conservatives

So misunderstood
 
Conservative Darwinism

Personal responsibility and a practiced belief that no one owes me a damn thing simply because I don't have it.

I know.....you are one of those who NEVER received any help from anyone

You are a credit to us all

There isn't a single person that hasn't had some form of help in their lifetime. However, there is a difference between help someone gives voluntarily and being forced to help another person. I don't have a problem with one person helping another and doing so of their own volition. I do have a problem when someone asks for help, is told no, then gets the government to force it from those telling them no. The former isn't of the belief that it's owed. The latter is.

Government is there to do what needs doing
Helping those who need help....needs doing

Did you go to public school?


Utter nonsense and socialist spin.

Government, despite Dear Leader's o'babble, is not what we call the things we do together.

Government DOES NOT DO what needs to be done. Government mostly takes money from those who do things and transfers it to those who do not do things.
We the people established the government to do those things we needed done collectively
 
Give a man a fish and he will eat for a day, teach a man to fish and he will eat for a lifetime

This is one of the cornerstones of conservatism today. Self determination. No "free stuff". Who could have a problem with such a basic principle of society? Why don't Liberals get it?

But what happens when there are no fish where you live?
What happens if you can't afford a pole, tackle and a license?
What happens when you go to fish and are told......."Only members are allowed to fish here"

This is where government comes in. The idea that once you have taught people to fish, your job is done does not always work in a society. Sometimes we need government to break dowmn barriers to fishing

Sure a lot of "What it's" and excuses
 
Give a man a fish and he will eat for a day, teach a man to fish and he will eat for a lifetime

This is one of the cornerstones of conservatism today. Self determination. No "free stuff". Who could have a problem with such a basic principle of society? Why don't Liberals get it?

But what happens when there are no fish where you live?
What happens if you can't afford a pole, tackle and a license?
What happens when you go to fish and are told......."Only members are allowed to fish here"

This is where government comes in. The idea that once you have taught people to fish, your job is done does not always work in a society. Sometimes we need government to break dowmn barriers to fishing

The things you listed such as licenses were government created. Did you know only rich people can have broadcast licenses? Consider the fact that they cost at least a million dollars a piece.


regulations and licenses hurt the little guy and helps the big guy to keep the little guy down

the big guy can afford them or afford to work around them the little guy is forced out

who dares hunt in the kings forest

Yes regulations and licensing


Can make it difficult to fish can't it?

indeed it can

glad you can see it
 
Ah truisms!!

one of my favorites:


You can lead a leftard to reality but you cant make him think.
 

Forum List

Back
Top