Girl faces jail for giving out names of juveniles who raped her

[Artevelde]

You would think that Artevelde is somehow related to the RAPISTS he's defending here. The fact is that these sick, twisted teenagers took pictures of their rape and made them available to others. Their guilt is not in question.

What's disgusting is the FACT that because of their parent's financial status they were able to get the charges reduced to sexual assault through a plea bargain.

You're a complete idiot. Why do you hate the US constitution so much?

A hard cock inserted into an unconscious vagina is RAPE!

All the plea bargains in the fucking Universe can't change that one cold fact.

Fucking moron!

Apparently you want to change the law. I suggest you run for office. In the meantime I think it's best that the courts apply the law as it stands. It's called democracy and the rule of law.

 

[manifold]

What I criticized Pinestra for was the fact that he hysterically wants to insist that the guys were guilty of rape when they haven't been convicted of rape, but of a lesser charge.

I get that. I just don't understand why you'd so ferociously fight over a bone with no meat on it. Big fuck'n deal if GP thinks they raped her.

As for a contempt of court - ruling, who do you suppose is best placed to judge about that but the court itself?

A jury of her peers. And if you were on that jury, I'd be curious to know how you'd vote.

So if you're capable, perhaps you could take your balls out of your carefully crafted academic vacuum and offer an opinion. Or, you can continue to whine like a fucking bitch about others doing what you're astoundingly and perplexingly afraid to do yourself.

First of all, it's Pinestra who hysterically wants to fight against the FACT that they have NOT been found guilty of rape. Facts matter, especially in a judicial case. If you feel the facts don't really matter then you're an idiot or disingenious or both.

I have offered opinions on the case, but apparently you can't be bothered to read them or are too stupid to understand them. A contempt of court case is NEVER judged by a jury because it has absolutely nothing to do with the jury, but apparently you are too ignorant of judicial procedure to understand that. Pontificating about things you don't understand is pretty sad actually.

You asked who I thought was the best, and I gave you my opinion on the matter.

I can't help it if you're too much of a pussy to offer any opinions yourself.

 

[manifold]

You're a complete idiot. Why do you hate the US constitution so much?

A hard cock inserted into an unconscious vagina is RAPE!

All the plea bargains in the fucking Universe can't change that one cold fact.

Fucking moron!

Apparently you want to change the law. I suggest you run for office. In the meantime I think it's best that the courts apply the law as it stands. It's called democracy and the rule of law.

^XXXXXX thinks people should keep their opinions to themselves on an internet message board.

 

[Artevelde]

I get that. I just don't understand why you'd so ferociously fight over a bone with no meat on it. Big fuck'n deal if GP thinks they raped her.




A jury of her peers. And if you were on that jury, I'd be curious to know how you'd vote.

So if you're capable, perhaps you could take your balls out of your carefully crafted academic vacuum and offer an opinion. Or, you can continue to whine like a fucking bitch about others doing what you're astoundingly and perplexingly afraid to do yourself.

First of all, it's Pinestra who hysterically wants to fight against the FACT that they have NOT been found guilty of rape. Facts matter, especially in a judicial case. If you feel the facts don't really matter then you're an idiot or disingenious or both.

I have offered opinions on the case, but apparently you can't be bothered to read them or are too stupid to understand them. A contempt of court case is NEVER judged by a jury because it has absolutely nothing to do with the jury, but apparently you are too ignorant of judicial procedure to understand that. Pontificating about things you don't understand is pretty sad actually.

You asked who I thought was the best, and I gave you my opinion on the matter.

I can't help it if you're too much of a pussy to offer any opinions yourself.

Try learning to read. It's a useful skill.

 

[manifold]

First of all, it's Pinestra who hysterically wants to fight against the FACT that they have NOT been found guilty of rape. Facts matter, especially in a judicial case. If you feel the facts don't really matter then you're an idiot or disingenious or both.

I have offered opinions on the case, but apparently you can't be bothered to read them or are too stupid to understand them. A contempt of court case is NEVER judged by a jury because it has absolutely nothing to do with the jury, but apparently you are too ignorant of judicial procedure to understand that. Pontificating about things you don't understand is pretty sad actually.

You asked who I thought was the best, and I gave you my opinion on the matter.

I can't help it if you're too much of a pussy to offer any opinions yourself.

Try learning to read. It's a useful skill.

My reading skills are clearly not up to snuff here, so I'm hoping one of you decent folks might be able to help me out here and link the post where Artard expresses a definitive opinion about whether this girl should be punished for tweeting the attacker's names.

Thanks in advance.

 

[Full-Auto]

You feel you have all the facts in the case and know sufficiently about it to make such a judgement?

I have enough of the facts to make a judgement.

They were convicted of a sexual offense, that automatically make them sexual offenders.

Now point out how I am wrong.

Then you might explain how drunk and disorderly conduct is charged in a private home.


I do not mind schooling you if needed.

Can you pull your head out long enough?

Another one who feels we can abolish the courts and the constitution.

Now that is desperation since you have zero ability to actually debate.

Grow a pair junior...............

 

[GuyPinestra]

You're a complete idiot. Why do you hate the US constitution so much?

A hard cock inserted into an unconscious vagina is RAPE!

All the plea bargains in the fucking Universe can't change that one cold fact.

Fucking moron!

Apparently you want to change the law. I suggest you run for office. In the meantime I think it's best that the courts apply the law as it stands. It's called democracy and the rule of law.

Not only do you use hyperbole to pigeonhole an argument you don't agree with, but you're now trying to ascribe motives to me that I've not claimed for myself. You must be a mind reader as well as an apologist for sexual predators.

Also, you prove your lack of knowledge of our governmental system with your use of the word 'democracy'.

 

[Artevelde]

A hard cock inserted into an unconscious vagina is RAPE!

All the plea bargains in the fucking Universe can't change that one cold fact.

Fucking moron!

Apparently you want to change the law. I suggest you run for office. In the meantime I think it's best that the courts apply the law as it stands. It's called democracy and the rule of law.

Not only do you use hyperbole to pigeonhole an argument you don't agree with, but you're now trying to ascribe motives to me that I've not claimed for myself. You must be a mind reader as well as an apologist for sexual predators.

Also, you prove your lack of knowledge of our governmental system with your use of the word 'democracy'.

You're clearly happy in your ignorance and stupidity. Enjoy.

 

[Full-Auto]

Apparently you want to change the law. I suggest you run for office. In the meantime I think it's best that the courts apply the law as it stands. It's called democracy and the rule of law.

Not only do you use hyperbole to pigeonhole an argument you don't agree with, but you're now trying to ascribe motives to me that I've not claimed for myself. You must be a mind reader as well as an apologist for sexual predators.

Also, you prove your lack of knowledge of our governmental system with your use of the word 'democracy'.

You're clearly happy in your ignorance and stupidity. Enjoy.

Isnt it time you grow a pair and explain how you managed to fabricate our positions?

 

[Artevelde]

Not only do you use hyperbole to pigeonhole an argument you don't agree with, but you're now trying to ascribe motives to me that I've not claimed for myself. You must be a mind reader as well as an apologist for sexual predators.

Also, you prove your lack of knowledge of our governmental system with your use of the word 'democracy'.

You're clearly happy in your ignorance and stupidity. Enjoy.

Isnt it time you grow a pair and explain how you managed to fabricate our positions?

Try taking some reading classes.

 

[Artevelde]

Not only do you use hyperbole to pigeonhole an argument you don't agree with, but you're now trying to ascribe motives to me that I've not claimed for myself. You must be a mind reader as well as an apologist for sexual predators.

Also, you prove your lack of knowledge of our governmental system with your use of the word 'democracy'.

You're clearly happy in your ignorance and stupidity. Enjoy.

Isnt it time you grow a pair and explain how you managed to fabricate our positions?

Your repeated fascination with testicles makes me think you must have some sexual hang-ups. Sad.

 

[WillowTree]

You're clearly happy in your ignorance and stupidity. Enjoy.

Isnt it time you grow a pair and explain how you managed to fabricate our positions?

Try taking some reading classes.

You might try enrolling in logic. and critical thinking. Seek remedial help if necessary.

 

[manifold]

Try learning to read. It's a useful skill.

My reading skills are clearly not up to snuff here, so I'm hoping one of you decent folks might be able to help me out here and link the post where Artard expresses a definitive opinion about whether this girl should be punished for tweeting the attacker's names.

Thanks in advance.

Anyone? Bueller?

 

[Full-Auto]

You're clearly happy in your ignorance and stupidity. Enjoy.

Isnt it time you grow a pair and explain how you managed to fabricate our positions?

Try taking some reading classes.

No need I read fine. You attributed positions to us we did not make ourselves.

Meaning you are a dumbshit.

Grow a pair. I realize democrats have trouble with that, but try worm........

 

[Artevelde]

Isnt it time you grow a pair and explain how you managed to fabricate our positions?

Try taking some reading classes.

No need I read fine. You attributed positions to us we did not make ourselves.

Meaning you are a dumbshit.

Grow a pair. I realize democrats have trouble with that, but try worm........

Gee, first time I get called a Democrat here on USMB. Some people will be very surprised. But only goes to show what kind of an empty-heade moron you are.

 

[WillowTree]

Try taking some reading classes.

No need I read fine. You attributed positions to us we did not make ourselves.

Meaning you are a dumbshit.

Grow a pair. I realize democrats have trouble with that, but try worm........

Gee, first time I get called a Democrat here on USMB. Some people will be very surprised. But only goes to show what kind of an empty-heade moron you are.

You are quite boring. I'll hand you that.

 

[Full-Auto]

Try taking some reading classes.

No need I read fine. You attributed positions to us we did not make ourselves.

Meaning you are a dumbshit.

Grow a pair. I realize democrats have trouble with that, but try worm........

Gee, first time I get called a Democrat here on USMB. Some people will be very surprised. But only goes to show what kind of an empty-heade moron you are.

I havent found many repubs as ignorant as you insist on being.

Now are you going to grow that pair or should we just continue to laugh at you?

 

[Artevelde]

No need I read fine. You attributed positions to us we did not make ourselves.

Meaning you are a dumbshit.

Grow a pair. I realize democrats have trouble with that, but try worm........

Gee, first time I get called a Democrat here on USMB. Some people will be very surprised. But only goes to show what kind of an empty-heade moron you are.

You are quite boring. I'll hand you that.

Yes, people who lack the intelligence to engage in an informed debate tend to say that.

 

[chanel]

Judges have a lot of discretion in juvenile cases. He could have said "Plead guilty to child porn and we'll drop the rape charges" No one would ever know because of the strict confidentiality rules regarding minors.

But she knew. And if she was raped she has every right to warn other girls.. Does anyone know exactly what her tweet said?

 

[Artevelde]

No need I read fine. You attributed positions to us we did not make ourselves.

Meaning you are a dumbshit.

Grow a pair. I realize democrats have trouble with that, but try worm........

Gee, first time I get called a Democrat here on USMB. Some people will be very surprised. But only goes to show what kind of an empty-heade moron you are.

I havent found many repubs as ignorant as you insist on being.

Now are you going to grow that pair or should we just continue to laugh at you?

You really are obsessed with testicles aren't you? Are you seeing somebody for that problem?