Girl faces jail for giving out names of juveniles who raped her

[ShootSpeeders]

The "boys" not only raped her but took pics of the crime and passed them around.!!!

Savannah Dietrich: Teen faces jail after lashing out on Twitter and naming the boys who sexually assaulted her | Mail Online

PUBLISHED: 16:06 EST, 21 July 2012

A 17-year-old sexual assault victim is facing a jail sentence for tweeting the names of her attackers in anger at their light punishment.
Savannah Dietrich named and shamed the boys on the social messaging site, writing: 'There you go, lock me up. I'm not protecting anyone that made my life a living Hell.'
The teenager told from Louisville, Kentucky told The Courier-Journal she was frustrated by what she feels is a lenient deal for her attackers.

Miss Dietrich told the paper she was assaulted in August 2011 by two boys she knew when she passed out after drinking at a gathering. She learned months later that pictures of the assault were taken and shared with others.

The contempt charge carries a possible sentence of 180 days in jail and a $500 fine.
The boys pleaded guilty on June 26 to first-degree sexual abuse and misdemeanor voyeurism. Miss Dietrich says she was unaware of a plea agreement until just before it was announced in court.

 

[Plasmaball]

hmmmmmmmmm..whats the basis for charging her?

 

[GuyPinestra]

The "boys" not only raped her but filmed the crime and put it on the internet.!!!

Savannah Dietrich: Teen faces jail after lashing out on Twitter and naming the boys who sexually assaulted her | Mail Online

PUBLISHED: 16:06 EST, 21 July 2012

A 17-year-old sexual assault victim is facing a jail sentence for tweeting the names of her attackers in anger at their light punishment.
Savannah Dietrich named and shamed the boys on the social messaging site, writing: 'There you go, lock me up. I'm not protecting anyone that made my life a living Hell.'
The teenager told from Louisville, Kentucky told The Courier-Journal she was frustrated by what she feels is a lenient deal for her attackers.

Miss Dietrich told the paper she was assaulted in August 2011 by two boys she knew when she passed out after drinking at a gathering. She learned months later that pictures of the assault were taken and shared with others.

The contempt charge carries a possible sentence of 180 days in jail and a $500 fine.
The boys pleaded guilty on June 26 to first-degree sexual abuse and misdemeanor voyeurism. Miss Dietrich says she was unaware of a plea agreement until just before it was announced in court.

That's BULLSHIT! I'll pay the $500 for her!

 

[uscitizen]

She too is a juvenile, seems like a bogus case against her.

 

[ShootSpeeders]

If we're gonna have special treatment for juveniles, the line should be drawn at 12 or so. Bet these criminals were 16 or 17 and should be treated as adults.

 

[Crackerjack]

If we're gonna have special treatment for juveniles, the line should be drawn at 12 or so. Bet these criminals were 16 or 17 and should be treated as adults.

Indeed. If you're old enough to commit a rape, you're no longer a juvenile.

 

[uscitizen]

The law is not allowed to give out the names of Juveniles but the victim cannot either?
Bullshit!

 

[GuyPinestra]

There is a support group for her here... Log In | Facebook

I'm sending some $$ and writing letters to the judge and the papers.

I know the link says log in, but the group number is in there...

groups/393361250721735/

 

[Full-Auto]

The "boys" not only raped her but took pics of the crime and passed them around.!!!

Savannah Dietrich: Teen faces jail after lashing out on Twitter and naming the boys who sexually assaulted her | Mail Online

PUBLISHED: 16:06 EST, 21 July 2012

A 17-year-old sexual assault victim is facing a jail sentence for tweeting the names of her attackers in anger at their light punishment.
Savannah Dietrich named and shamed the boys on the social messaging site, writing: 'There you go, lock me up. I'm not protecting anyone that made my life a living Hell.'
The teenager told from Louisville, Kentucky told The Courier-Journal she was frustrated by what she feels is a lenient deal for her attackers.

Miss Dietrich told the paper she was assaulted in August 2011 by two boys she knew when she passed out after drinking at a gathering. She learned months later that pictures of the assault were taken and shared with others.

The contempt charge carries a possible sentence of 180 days in jail and a $500 fine.
The boys pleaded guilty on June 26 to first-degree sexual abuse and misdemeanor voyeurism. Miss Dietrich says she was unaware of a plea agreement until just before it was announced in court.

I would guess anything she gets will be suspended. Donations would flood in.

 

[syrenn]

Good for her!

 

[ShootSpeeders]

Good for her!

The girl has some balls. You defy a judge and he'll throw the book at you.

 

[g5000]

A 17-year-old sexual assault victim

she passed out after drinking at a gathering.

Stupid.

 

[syrenn]

Good for her!

The girl has some balls. You defy a judge and he'll throw the book at you.

She is a minor just like the boys are..... I would be flouting the judges orders too. Minors are named in public all the time in connection to crimes..... and these boys were convicted..... so fuck them.

 

[Jackson]

A 17-year-old sexual assault victim

she passed out after drinking at a gathering.

Stupid.

Everyone is stupid at 17. But not rapists.

 

[GuyPinestra]

A 17-year-old sexual assault victim

she passed out after drinking at a gathering.

Stupid.

Stupid, yes.

Worthy of rape? Not a fucking chance, I hope somebody beats the shit out of those two bastards!

 

[g5000]

A 17-year-old sexual assault victim

she passed out after drinking at a gathering.

Stupid.

Everyone is stupid at 17. But not rapists.

That makes zero sense. Raping someone somehow makes the minor rapist smarter? How does THAT work?

The article does not say what their sentences were. It just says she is not happy with the sentences they received.

She does not strike me as someone who has the best judgement, so her opinion about their sentences should be taken in that light.

 

[Chris]

Juveniles accused of crimes should have their names revealed.

 

[ogibillm]

Stupid.

Everyone is stupid at 17. But not rapists.

That makes zero sense. Raping someone somehow makes the minor rapist smarter? How does THAT work?

The article does not say what their sentences were. It just says she is not happy with the sentences they received.

She does not strike me as someone who has the best judgement, so her opinion about their sentences should be taken in that light.

All 17 year olds are stupid. Not all 17 year olds are rapists. Im sure thats what was meant.

However this does seem like the definition of contempt. Given her circumstances though i couldnt support punishing her very much

 

[GuyPinestra]

I wonder how they like their pictures on the Internet?

 

[syrenn]

Juveniles accused of crimes should have their names revealed.

juveniles convicted of crimes should have their names revealed......