For his security detail.
Why aren't the "fiscal conservatives" in melt down?
Why aren't the "fiscal conservatives" in melt down?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
He's renting out his donor list to make extra cash to pay his campaign debt.
He's renting out his donor list to make extra cash to pay his campaign debt.
Secret service isn't a campaign debt
Now that you have made me aware of it, I will be angry. Thanks.
Neocons aren't fiscal conservatives
When we couldn't get the left to be outraged over the security expenses for the "Tourist In Chief" we gave up caring about any fiscal fauxrage from the left over anyone's security expenses.For his security detail.
Why aren't the "fiscal conservatives" in melt down?
man oh man..
Now they are worrying about 40,000 a day
I'd hate to add up the cost of Obama using air force one on all his jaunts for campaigning, fundraisers, tv interview, trips, etc etc
the abuse by this man of us taxpayers is astounding..
Just to put things into perspective, Ron Paul doesn't use SS detail and wouldn't even as president, he would provide his own security.
Just to put things into perspective, Ron Paul doesn't use SS detail and wouldn't even as president, he would provide his own security.
Ron Paul is not even a blip on the Election screen. That loser doesn't need Secret Service protection.
If by some travesty he were to eve be President, he'd absolutely still get Secret Service protection. It's not a "choice" matter.
Now that I have been made aware of the cost, I still don't care.
I'm not opposed to all government spending.
I am opposed to stupid, needless and unauthorized government spending.
It is arguable that the Newt campaign should officially fold its tents and that the "need" for such expensive protection should then be formally and officially reassessed. But until then, it still falls into at least a proper category.