Germans are kind of stupid.

So, the Moors weren't evil, despite their slave trades of both Africans, and Europeans?

Furthermore, is it more likely that Moors had been civilized before Sumerians, or Vincans?
The Moors did their dirt by enslaving whites and Blacks. However it wasnt chattel slavery like whites made up.

You do realize the Moors are AD not BC like the Sumerians (who were Black as well) right?

I'd love to see evidence of Sumerians being Black, rather than Mediterranean.
You want biblical or their own words?

The bible isn't the best source, but so be it.
Canaan and Nimrods descendants populated Sumer. They were Black.

Proof?
We know what the genetics of Neolithic peoples were in the region, it was Mediterranean all the way into Iran.
 
On Tuesday, a 43-year-old Mississippi woman and her six-year-old daughter were snapping a selfie in front of a wild bison when the massive animal attacked.

The woman, who had her back turned to the bison even though it was barely six yards away, tried to flee but was overtaken by the bison and tossed into the air, according to the Associated Press. The unidentified tourist was taken to a clinic nearby and treated for minor injuries.

The attack is the fifth so far this year in which a Yellowstone tourist got too close to a bison.

And although it appears to be the first bison selfie-gone-wrong in the park, two previous incidents also involved people approaching the hulking animals for photos.

Bison selfies are a bad idea: Tourist gored in Yellowstone as another photo goes awry
Not too bright. You dont stand 6 yards away from an animal that massive with your back turned unless you have raised it from infancy and even then I wouldnt do it.

So, you were fighting for the Bison to not be shot in this comment?
Really? really now?

Given on other topics where you stand against animal rights.......
Who said I was fighting for the bison not to be shot?

Where are the quotes I asked you for? How will I know where I need to dumb it down to accommodate your inferior brain?

So, you do think the Bison should be shot?
Lets get you straight first. Show me where your reading comprehension failed you. Just use quotes so you dont have work to hard on an explanation.
 
On Tuesday, a 43-year-old Mississippi woman and her six-year-old daughter were snapping a selfie in front of a wild bison when the massive animal attacked.

The woman, who had her back turned to the bison even though it was barely six yards away, tried to flee but was overtaken by the bison and tossed into the air, according to the Associated Press. The unidentified tourist was taken to a clinic nearby and treated for minor injuries.

The attack is the fifth so far this year in which a Yellowstone tourist got too close to a bison.

And although it appears to be the first bison selfie-gone-wrong in the park, two previous incidents also involved people approaching the hulking animals for photos.

Bison selfies are a bad idea: Tourist gored in Yellowstone as another photo goes awry
Not too bright. You dont stand 6 yards away from an animal that massive with your back turned unless you have raised it from infancy and even then I wouldnt do it.

So, you were fighting for the Bison to not be shot in this comment?
Really? really now?

Given on other topics where you stand against animal rights.......
Who said I was fighting for the bison not to be shot?

Where are the quotes I asked you for? How will I know where I need to dumb it down to accommodate your inferior brain?

So, you do think the Bison should be shot?
Lets get you straight first. Show me where your reading comprehension failed you. Just use quotes so you dont have work to hard on an explanation.

You may have not come out, and said the Bison should be shot.

But, your actions support this.
 
Not too bright. You dont stand 6 yards away from an animal that massive with your back turned unless you have raised it from infancy and even then I wouldnt do it.

So, you were fighting for the Bison to not be shot in this comment?
Really? really now?

Given on other topics where you stand against animal rights.......
Who said I was fighting for the bison not to be shot?

Where are the quotes I asked you for? How will I know where I need to dumb it down to accommodate your inferior brain?

So, you do think the Bison should be shot?
Lets get you straight first. Show me where your reading comprehension failed you. Just use quotes so you dont have work to hard on an explanation.

You may have not come out, and said the Bison should be shot.

But, your actions support this.
What actions? You cant see me. Did you mean my words? If so quote them so we can explore the reasons your reading comprehension was faulty.
 
So, you were fighting for the Bison to not be shot in this comment?
Really? really now?

Given on other topics where you stand against animal rights.......
Who said I was fighting for the bison not to be shot?

Where are the quotes I asked you for? How will I know where I need to dumb it down to accommodate your inferior brain?

So, you do think the Bison should be shot?
Lets get you straight first. Show me where your reading comprehension failed you. Just use quotes so you dont have work to hard on an explanation.

You may have not come out, and said the Bison should be shot.

But, your actions support this.
What actions? You cant see me. Did you mean my words? If so quote them so we can explore the reasons your reading comprehension was faulty.

So, why do you refuse to come out, and say it.

Yes, or no the Bison should have been shot?
 
Who said I was fighting for the bison not to be shot?

Where are the quotes I asked you for? How will I know where I need to dumb it down to accommodate your inferior brain?

So, you do think the Bison should be shot?
Lets get you straight first. Show me where your reading comprehension failed you. Just use quotes so you dont have work to hard on an explanation.

You may have not come out, and said the Bison should be shot.

But, your actions support this.
What actions? You cant see me. Did you mean my words? If so quote them so we can explore the reasons your reading comprehension was faulty.

So, why do you refuse to come out, and say it.

Yes, or no the Bison should have been shot?
Because I am waiting for you to answer my question. Do you often leave your work unfinished and move on to something else?
 
So, you do think the Bison should be shot?
Lets get you straight first. Show me where your reading comprehension failed you. Just use quotes so you dont have work to hard on an explanation.

You may have not come out, and said the Bison should be shot.

But, your actions support this.
What actions? You cant see me. Did you mean my words? If so quote them so we can explore the reasons your reading comprehension was faulty.

So, why do you refuse to come out, and say it.

Yes, or no the Bison should have been shot?
Because I am waiting for you to answer my question. Do you often leave your work unfinished and move on to something else?

So, you started arguing about big animals being dangerous, and keep denying that you think this animal should be shot.

Because you believe, the animal shouldn't have been shot?

Really, really now?
 
Here's the DNA of Natufians of Neolithic Israel, keep in mind they're overwhelmingly ENF, a Mediterranean type.

Anthromadness: PCA & ADMIXTURE results for Natufians

Eurogenes ANE K7
ENF:
77%
WHG-UHG: 16%
East African: 8%
Makes sense. The mediterraneans were originally Blacks too. Black isnt relegated to what we know now as Africa. That entire area all the way to India was known as African.

ENF is Mediterranean, represented people from Spain, and Morocco, all the way into Iran, and Oman.

Certainly not Black Africans.
 
Here's the DNA of Natufians of Neolithic Israel, keep in mind they're overwhelmingly ENF, a Mediterranean type.

Anthromadness: PCA & ADMIXTURE results for Natufians

Eurogenes ANE K7
ENF:
77%
WHG-UHG: 16%
East African: 8%
Makes sense. The mediterraneans were originally Blacks too. Black isnt relegated to what we know now as Africa. That entire area all the way to India was known as African.

ENF is Mediterranean, represented people from Spain, and Morocco, all the way into Iran, and Oman.

Certainly not Black Africans.
They werent Black Africans. They were Blacks from Africa that were Black Mediterraneans. Even the biblical evidence you requested proves this.
 
Lets get you straight first. Show me where your reading comprehension failed you. Just use quotes so you dont have work to hard on an explanation.

You may have not come out, and said the Bison should be shot.

But, your actions support this.
What actions? You cant see me. Did you mean my words? If so quote them so we can explore the reasons your reading comprehension was faulty.

So, why do you refuse to come out, and say it.

Yes, or no the Bison should have been shot?
Because I am waiting for you to answer my question. Do you often leave your work unfinished and move on to something else?

So, you started arguing about big animals being dangerous, and keep denying that you think this animal should be shot.

Because you believe, the animal shouldn't have been shot?

Really, really now?
Where did I argue and why havent you quoted where you were confused so I can help you out?
 
Last edited:
Here's the DNA of Natufians of Neolithic Israel, keep in mind they're overwhelmingly ENF, a Mediterranean type.

Anthromadness: PCA & ADMIXTURE results for Natufians

Eurogenes ANE K7
ENF:
77%
WHG-UHG: 16%
East African: 8%
Makes sense. The mediterraneans were originally Blacks too. Black isnt relegated to what we know now as Africa. That entire area all the way to India was known as African.

ENF is Mediterranean, represented people from Spain, and Morocco, all the way into Iran, and Oman.

Certainly not Black Africans.
They werent Black Africans. They were Blacks from Africa that were Black Mediterraneans. Even the biblical evidence you requested proves this.

Slavery, genocide, and war all started in Mediterranean regions.

Do, you think it's Black now?
 
You may have not come out, and said the Bison should be shot.

But, your actions support this.
What actions? You cant see me. Did you mean my words? If so quote them so we can explore the reasons your reading comprehension was faulty.

So, why do you refuse to come out, and say it.

Yes, or no the Bison should have been shot?
Because I am waiting for you to answer my question. Do you often leave your work unfinished and move on to something else?

So, you started arguing about big animals being dangerous, and keep denying that you think this animal should be shot.

Because you believe, the animal shouldn't have been shot?

Really, really now?
Where did argue and why havent you quoted where you were confused so I can help you out?

Yet, you still can't tell us directly what you think the fate of this animal should be?
 
Here's the DNA of Natufians of Neolithic Israel, keep in mind they're overwhelmingly ENF, a Mediterranean type.

Anthromadness: PCA & ADMIXTURE results for Natufians

Eurogenes ANE K7
ENF:
77%
WHG-UHG: 16%
East African: 8%
Makes sense. The mediterraneans were originally Blacks too. Black isnt relegated to what we know now as Africa. That entire area all the way to India was known as African.

ENF is Mediterranean, represented people from Spain, and Morocco, all the way into Iran, and Oman.

Certainly not Black Africans.
They werent Black Africans. They were Blacks from Africa that were Black Mediterraneans. Even the biblical evidence you requested proves this.

Slavery, genocide, and war all started in Mediterranean regions.

Do, you think it's Black now?
Thats was long after Blacks were invaded by whites. Yes it was originally Black.
 
What actions? You cant see me. Did you mean my words? If so quote them so we can explore the reasons your reading comprehension was faulty.

So, why do you refuse to come out, and say it.

Yes, or no the Bison should have been shot?
Because I am waiting for you to answer my question. Do you often leave your work unfinished and move on to something else?

So, you started arguing about big animals being dangerous, and keep denying that you think this animal should be shot.

Because you believe, the animal shouldn't have been shot?

Really, really now?
Where did argue and why havent you quoted where you were confused so I can help you out?

Yet, you still can't tell us directly what you think the fate of this animal should be?
You still havent pointed out where you got confused. I'm just biding my time.
 
Here's the DNA of Natufians of Neolithic Israel, keep in mind they're overwhelmingly ENF, a Mediterranean type.

Anthromadness: PCA & ADMIXTURE results for Natufians

Eurogenes ANE K7
ENF:
77%
WHG-UHG: 16%
East African: 8%
Makes sense. The mediterraneans were originally Blacks too. Black isnt relegated to what we know now as Africa. That entire area all the way to India was known as African.

ENF is Mediterranean, represented people from Spain, and Morocco, all the way into Iran, and Oman.

Certainly not Black Africans.
They werent Black Africans. They were Blacks from Africa that were Black Mediterraneans. Even the biblical evidence you requested proves this.

Slavery, genocide, and war all started in Mediterranean regions.

Do, you think it's Black now?
Thats was long after Blacks were invaded by whites. Yes it was originally Black.

Investigations as 13,000-year-old bodies discovered on edge of Sahara | Daily Mail Online

The first race war? Scientists investigating after 13,000-year-old bodies are discovered on the edge of the Sahara
  • Skeletons from first human massacre will be displayed at British Museum
  • Remains from 11,000BC found in Jebel Sahaba cemetery in Sahara desert
  • Scientists say mass murder caused by 'environmental disaster' of Ice Age
  • At least 60 individuals found in excavation by American archaeologist
By Steph Cockroft and Sarah Griffiths

Published: 01:03 EDT, 14 July 2014 | Updated: 08:25 EDT, 14 July 2014

105

View
comments

Humans remains of people killed 13,000 years ago in what scientists believe is the oldest identified race war, are today due to go on display at the British Museum in London.

Two skeletons from a massacre in the Sahara desert in 11,000BC, which killed at least 26 people, will be shown in the new Ancient Egypt gallery, alongside the flint-tipped weapons with which they were killed.

French scientists have been working with the museum to examine dozens of skeletons that were found grouped together in the Jebel Sahaba cemetery - one of the earliest organised burial grounds - on the east bank of the Nile, northern Sudan, in the 1960s.


article-2691102-1FA147D300000578-992_634x422.jpg


+7 <img id="i-1014960a5008d5df" src="http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2014/07/14/article-2691102-1FA147D300000578-992_634x422.jpg" height="422" width="634" alt="A pair of skeletons belonging to people who were killed on a massacre 13,000 years ago as the result of climate change, are going on show in the British Museum, London. Pencils pinpoint out pieces of weaponry responsible for their demise" class="blkBorder img-share"/>
A pair of skeletons belonging to people who were killed on a massacre 13,000 years ago as the result of climate change, are going on show in the British Museum, London. Pencils pinpoint out pieces of weaponry responsible for their demise

well as the human remains, the display will include flint arrowhead fragments and a healed forearm fracture, which was most likely sustained by a victim who was trying to defend himself during conflict.

Over the past two years, anthropologists from Bordeaux University have managed to find dozens of previously undetected conflict marks on the victims' bones.

The British Museum scientists are now planning to research more about the victims themselves, including their gender, their age and their diet.

Meanwhile, according to The Independent, work carried out at Liverpool John Moores University, the University of Alaska and New Orleans’ Tulane University suggests these humans were part of the general sub-Saharan originating population, who were ancestors of modern Black Africans.

Dr. Daniel Antoine, a curator in the British Museum’s Ancient Egypt and Sudan Department, told the paper: 'The skeletal material is of great importance – not only because of the evidence for conflict, but also because the Jebel Sahaba cemetery is the oldest discovered in the Nile valley so far.'


article-2691102-1FA2D67100000578-212_634x474.jpg


+7 <img id="i-1240822e40e5b738" src="http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2014/07/14/article-2691102-1FA2D67100000578-212_634x474.jpg" height="474" width="634" alt="The cemetery where the remains were discovered in the 1960s is one of the earliest organised burial grounds in the world and lies on the east bank of the Nile, northern Sudan (marked)" class="blkBorder img-share"/>
The cemetery where the remains were discovered in the 1960s is one of the earliest organised burial grounds in the world and lies on the east bank of the Nile, northern Sudan (marked)

Share or comment on this article


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2691102/The-race-war-Scientists-investigating-13-000-year-old-bodies-discovered-edge-Sahara.html#ixzz4td5VsKJt
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

 
Makes sense. The mediterraneans were originally Blacks too. Black isnt relegated to what we know now as Africa. That entire area all the way to India was known as African.

ENF is Mediterranean, represented people from Spain, and Morocco, all the way into Iran, and Oman.

Certainly not Black Africans.
They werent Black Africans. They were Blacks from Africa that were Black Mediterraneans. Even the biblical evidence you requested proves this.

Slavery, genocide, and war all started in Mediterranean regions.

Do, you think it's Black now?
Thats was long after Blacks were invaded by whites. Yes it was originally Black.

Investigations as 13,000-year-old bodies discovered on edge of Sahara | Daily Mail Online

The first race war? Scientists investigating after 13,000-year-old bodies are discovered on the edge of the Sahara
  • Skeletons from first human massacre will be displayed at British Museum
  • Remains from 11,000BC found in Jebel Sahaba cemetery in Sahara desert
  • Scientists say mass murder caused by 'environmental disaster' of Ice Age
  • At least 60 individuals found in excavation by American archaeologist
By Steph Cockroft and Sarah Griffiths

Published: 01:03 EDT, 14 July 2014 | Updated: 08:25 EDT, 14 July 2014

105

View
comments

Humans remains of people killed 13,000 years ago in what scientists believe is the oldest identified race war, are today due to go on display at the British Museum in London.

Two skeletons from a massacre in the Sahara desert in 11,000BC, which killed at least 26 people, will be shown in the new Ancient Egypt gallery, alongside the flint-tipped weapons with which they were killed.

French scientists have been working with the museum to examine dozens of skeletons that were found grouped together in the Jebel Sahaba cemetery - one of the earliest organised burial grounds - on the east bank of the Nile, northern Sudan, in the 1960s.


article-2691102-1FA147D300000578-992_634x422.jpg


+7 <img id="i-1014960a5008d5df" src="http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2014/07/14/article-2691102-1FA147D300000578-992_634x422.jpg" height="422" width="634" alt="A pair of skeletons belonging to people who were killed on a massacre 13,000 years ago as the result of climate change, are going on show in the British Museum, London. Pencils pinpoint out pieces of weaponry responsible for their demise" class="blkBorder img-share"/>
A pair of skeletons belonging to people who were killed on a massacre 13,000 years ago as the result of climate change, are going on show in the British Museum, London. Pencils pinpoint out pieces of weaponry responsible for their demise

well as the human remains, the display will include flint arrowhead fragments and a healed forearm fracture, which was most likely sustained by a victim who was trying to defend himself during conflict.

Over the past two years, anthropologists from Bordeaux University have managed to find dozens of previously undetected conflict marks on the victims' bones.

The British Museum scientists are now planning to research more about the victims themselves, including their gender, their age and their diet.

Meanwhile, according to The Independent, work carried out at Liverpool John Moores University, the University of Alaska and New Orleans’ Tulane University suggests these humans were part of the general sub-Saharan originating population, who were ancestors of modern Black Africans.

Dr. Daniel Antoine, a curator in the British Museum’s Ancient Egypt and Sudan Department, told the paper: 'The skeletal material is of great importance – not only because of the evidence for conflict, but also because the Jebel Sahaba cemetery is the oldest discovered in the Nile valley so far.'


article-2691102-1FA2D67100000578-212_634x474.jpg


+7 <img id="i-1240822e40e5b738" src="http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2014/07/14/article-2691102-1FA2D67100000578-212_634x474.jpg" height="474" width="634" alt="The cemetery where the remains were discovered in the 1960s is one of the earliest organised burial grounds in the world and lies on the east bank of the Nile, northern Sudan (marked)" class="blkBorder img-share"/>
The cemetery where the remains were discovered in the 1960s is one of the earliest organised burial grounds in the world and lies on the east bank of the Nile, northern Sudan (marked)

Share or comment on this article


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2691102/The-race-war-Scientists-investigating-13-000-year-old-bodies-discovered-edge-Sahara.html#ixzz4td5VsKJt
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook



From your link. Thanks BTW.

"Meanwhile, according to The Independent, work carried out at Liverpool John Moores University, the University of Alaska and New Orleans’ Tulane University suggests these humans were part of the general sub-Saharan originating population, who were ancestors of modern Black Africans.

Read more: Investigations as 13,000-year-old bodies discovered on edge of Sahara | Daily Mail Online
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook"
 
ENF is Mediterranean, represented people from Spain, and Morocco, all the way into Iran, and Oman.

Certainly not Black Africans.
They werent Black Africans. They were Blacks from Africa that were Black Mediterraneans. Even the biblical evidence you requested proves this.

Slavery, genocide, and war all started in Mediterranean regions.

Do, you think it's Black now?
Thats was long after Blacks were invaded by whites. Yes it was originally Black.

Investigations as 13,000-year-old bodies discovered on edge of Sahara | Daily Mail Online

The first race war? Scientists investigating after 13,000-year-old bodies are discovered on the edge of the Sahara
  • Skeletons from first human massacre will be displayed at British Museum
  • Remains from 11,000BC found in Jebel Sahaba cemetery in Sahara desert
  • Scientists say mass murder caused by 'environmental disaster' of Ice Age
  • At least 60 individuals found in excavation by American archaeologist
By Steph Cockroft and Sarah Griffiths

Published: 01:03 EDT, 14 July 2014 | Updated: 08:25 EDT, 14 July 2014

105

View
comments

Humans remains of people killed 13,000 years ago in what scientists believe is the oldest identified race war, are today due to go on display at the British Museum in London.

Two skeletons from a massacre in the Sahara desert in 11,000BC, which killed at least 26 people, will be shown in the new Ancient Egypt gallery, alongside the flint-tipped weapons with which they were killed.

French scientists have been working with the museum to examine dozens of skeletons that were found grouped together in the Jebel Sahaba cemetery - one of the earliest organised burial grounds - on the east bank of the Nile, northern Sudan, in the 1960s.


article-2691102-1FA147D300000578-992_634x422.jpg


+7 <img id="i-1014960a5008d5df" src="http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2014/07/14/article-2691102-1FA147D300000578-992_634x422.jpg" height="422" width="634" alt="A pair of skeletons belonging to people who were killed on a massacre 13,000 years ago as the result of climate change, are going on show in the British Museum, London. Pencils pinpoint out pieces of weaponry responsible for their demise" class="blkBorder img-share"/>
A pair of skeletons belonging to people who were killed on a massacre 13,000 years ago as the result of climate change, are going on show in the British Museum, London. Pencils pinpoint out pieces of weaponry responsible for their demise

well as the human remains, the display will include flint arrowhead fragments and a healed forearm fracture, which was most likely sustained by a victim who was trying to defend himself during conflict.

Over the past two years, anthropologists from Bordeaux University have managed to find dozens of previously undetected conflict marks on the victims' bones.

The British Museum scientists are now planning to research more about the victims themselves, including their gender, their age and their diet.

Meanwhile, according to The Independent, work carried out at Liverpool John Moores University, the University of Alaska and New Orleans’ Tulane University suggests these humans were part of the general sub-Saharan originating population, who were ancestors of modern Black Africans.

Dr. Daniel Antoine, a curator in the British Museum’s Ancient Egypt and Sudan Department, told the paper: 'The skeletal material is of great importance – not only because of the evidence for conflict, but also because the Jebel Sahaba cemetery is the oldest discovered in the Nile valley so far.'


article-2691102-1FA2D67100000578-212_634x474.jpg


+7 <img id="i-1240822e40e5b738" src="http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2014/07/14/article-2691102-1FA2D67100000578-212_634x474.jpg" height="474" width="634" alt="The cemetery where the remains were discovered in the 1960s is one of the earliest organised burial grounds in the world and lies on the east bank of the Nile, northern Sudan (marked)" class="blkBorder img-share"/>
The cemetery where the remains were discovered in the 1960s is one of the earliest organised burial grounds in the world and lies on the east bank of the Nile, northern Sudan (marked)

Share or comment on this article


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2691102/The-race-war-Scientists-investigating-13-000-year-old-bodies-discovered-edge-Sahara.html#ixzz4td5VsKJt
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook



From your link. Thanks BTW.

"Meanwhile, according to The Independent, work carried out at Liverpool John Moores University, the University of Alaska and New Orleans’ Tulane University suggests these humans were part of the general sub-Saharan originating population, who were ancestors of modern Black Africans.

Read more: Investigations as 13,000-year-old bodies discovered on edge of Sahara | Daily Mail Online
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook"

It says the victims were Negroid, but it's well known the perps were not Negroid.
 
They werent Black Africans. They were Blacks from Africa that were Black Mediterraneans. Even the biblical evidence you requested proves this.

Slavery, genocide, and war all started in Mediterranean regions.

Do, you think it's Black now?
Thats was long after Blacks were invaded by whites. Yes it was originally Black.

Investigations as 13,000-year-old bodies discovered on edge of Sahara | Daily Mail Online

The first race war? Scientists investigating after 13,000-year-old bodies are discovered on the edge of the Sahara
  • Skeletons from first human massacre will be displayed at British Museum
  • Remains from 11,000BC found in Jebel Sahaba cemetery in Sahara desert
  • Scientists say mass murder caused by 'environmental disaster' of Ice Age
  • At least 60 individuals found in excavation by American archaeologist
By Steph Cockroft and Sarah Griffiths

Published: 01:03 EDT, 14 July 2014 | Updated: 08:25 EDT, 14 July 2014

105

View
comments

Humans remains of people killed 13,000 years ago in what scientists believe is the oldest identified race war, are today due to go on display at the British Museum in London.

Two skeletons from a massacre in the Sahara desert in 11,000BC, which killed at least 26 people, will be shown in the new Ancient Egypt gallery, alongside the flint-tipped weapons with which they were killed.

French scientists have been working with the museum to examine dozens of skeletons that were found grouped together in the Jebel Sahaba cemetery - one of the earliest organised burial grounds - on the east bank of the Nile, northern Sudan, in the 1960s.


article-2691102-1FA147D300000578-992_634x422.jpg


+7 <img id="i-1014960a5008d5df" src="http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2014/07/14/article-2691102-1FA147D300000578-992_634x422.jpg" height="422" width="634" alt="A pair of skeletons belonging to people who were killed on a massacre 13,000 years ago as the result of climate change, are going on show in the British Museum, London. Pencils pinpoint out pieces of weaponry responsible for their demise" class="blkBorder img-share"/>
A pair of skeletons belonging to people who were killed on a massacre 13,000 years ago as the result of climate change, are going on show in the British Museum, London. Pencils pinpoint out pieces of weaponry responsible for their demise

well as the human remains, the display will include flint arrowhead fragments and a healed forearm fracture, which was most likely sustained by a victim who was trying to defend himself during conflict.

Over the past two years, anthropologists from Bordeaux University have managed to find dozens of previously undetected conflict marks on the victims' bones.

The British Museum scientists are now planning to research more about the victims themselves, including their gender, their age and their diet.

Meanwhile, according to The Independent, work carried out at Liverpool John Moores University, the University of Alaska and New Orleans’ Tulane University suggests these humans were part of the general sub-Saharan originating population, who were ancestors of modern Black Africans.

Dr. Daniel Antoine, a curator in the British Museum’s Ancient Egypt and Sudan Department, told the paper: 'The skeletal material is of great importance – not only because of the evidence for conflict, but also because the Jebel Sahaba cemetery is the oldest discovered in the Nile valley so far.'


article-2691102-1FA2D67100000578-212_634x474.jpg


+7 <img id="i-1240822e40e5b738" src="http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2014/07/14/article-2691102-1FA2D67100000578-212_634x474.jpg" height="474" width="634" alt="The cemetery where the remains were discovered in the 1960s is one of the earliest organised burial grounds in the world and lies on the east bank of the Nile, northern Sudan (marked)" class="blkBorder img-share"/>
The cemetery where the remains were discovered in the 1960s is one of the earliest organised burial grounds in the world and lies on the east bank of the Nile, northern Sudan (marked)

Share or comment on this article


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2691102/The-race-war-Scientists-investigating-13-000-year-old-bodies-discovered-edge-Sahara.html#ixzz4td5VsKJt
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook



From your link. Thanks BTW.

"Meanwhile, according to The Independent, work carried out at Liverpool John Moores University, the University of Alaska and New Orleans’ Tulane University suggests these humans were part of the general sub-Saharan originating population, who were ancestors of modern Black Africans.

Read more: Investigations as 13,000-year-old bodies discovered on edge of Sahara | Daily Mail Online
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook"

It says the victims were Negroid, but it's well known the perps were not Negroid.
The would be Black. All the people in that area was Black. Kind of puts the brakes on that white boy theory that Blacks were allergic to sand and couldnt occupy N. Africa doesnt it? Do you see something in the article that says there were white people there?
 

Forum List

Back
Top