RetiredGySgt
Diamond Member
Whats wrong, you can not handle facts or evidence of your stupidity?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
George Zimmerman, the neighbourhood watch volunteer charged with the murder of Trayvon Martin, unexpectedly took the stand at a bail hearing on Friday and apologised to the teenager's family.
"I wanted to say I am sorry for the loss of their son. I did not know how old he was I thought he was a little bit younger than I am. And I did not know if he was armed or not," Zimmerman said.
So he shot someone when he didn't even know if they were armed?
George Zimmerman sorry for Trayvon Martin death as bail set at $150,000 | World news | guardian.co.uk
George Zimmerman, the neighbourhood watch volunteer charged with the murder of Trayvon Martin, unexpectedly took the stand at a bail hearing on Friday and apologised to the teenager's family.
"I wanted to say I am sorry for the loss of their son. I did not know how old he was I thought he was a little bit younger than I am. And I did not know if he was armed or not," Zimmerman said.
So he shot someone when he didn't even know if they were armed?
Where's your evidence that he was being beat to death by a stronger foe? That part of the story is easier to believe than Zimmerman acted out of pure blood lust I suppose.So he shot someone when he didn't even know if they were armed?
I'm not prepared to take sides on this story because I don't have all the evidence but there is another side to your comment here. So, without referring to any particular case, if you were in the process of being beat to death by a stronger foe, wouldn't you use any weapon you might have at your disposal to stop your pending death?
I would.
George Zimmerman sorry for Trayvon Martin death as bail set at $150,000 | World news | guardian.co.uk
George Zimmerman, the neighbourhood watch volunteer charged with the murder of Trayvon Martin, unexpectedly took the stand at a bail hearing on Friday and apologised to the teenager's family.
"I wanted to say I am sorry for the loss of their son. I did not know how old he was I thought he was a little bit younger than I am. And I did not know if he was armed or not," Zimmerman said.
So he shot someone when he didn't even know if they were armed?
I am surprised his attorney allowed him to say that. If he was armed, he would have used his weapon instead of his hands. I can see that as an argument.
George Zimmerman sorry for Trayvon Martin death as bail set at $150,000 | World news | guardian.co.uk
George Zimmerman, the neighbourhood watch volunteer charged with the murder of Trayvon Martin, unexpectedly took the stand at a bail hearing on Friday and apologised to the teenager's family.
"I wanted to say I am sorry for the loss of their son. I did not know how old he was I thought he was a little bit younger than I am. And I did not know if he was armed or not," Zimmerman said.
So he shot someone when he didn't even know if they were armed?
I'm still going with my original question.
Where's your evidence that he was being beat to death by a stronger foe? That part of the story is easier to believe than Zimmerman acted out of pure blood lust I suppose.So he shot someone when he didn't even know if they were armed?
I'm not prepared to take sides on this story because I don't have all the evidence but there is another side to your comment here. So, without referring to any particular case, if you were in the process of being beat to death by a stronger foe, wouldn't you use any weapon you might have at your disposal to stop your pending death?
I would.
How about - would I fight for my life if some stranger followed me for a time, and then accosted me?
Yes. I would.
There should never had been any question that this case should be heard by a jury, stand your ground law or no stand your ground law. Whenever deadly force is used, someone should be held accountable for it.Where's your evidence that he was being beat to death by a stronger foe? That part of the story is easier to believe than Zimmerman acted out of pure blood lust I suppose.I'm not prepared to take sides on this story because I don't have all the evidence but there is another side to your comment here. So, without referring to any particular case, if you were in the process of being beat to death by a stronger foe, wouldn't you use any weapon you might have at your disposal to stop your pending death?
I would.
I have no such evidence, which is why I stated "I'm not prepared to take sides on this story because I don't have all the evidence". I merely commented on the hypothetical statement of shooting someone without knowing if they were or were not armed. I'll leave the Zimmerman case to the jury.
Whenever deadly force is used, someone should be held accountable for it.