Discussion in 'Politics' started by boss, Mar 13, 2004.
If you don't think so you are wrong.
Thanks for sharing!
Wow, now that's a compelling argument.
facts don't need a compelling argument to support them
Then show us the facts on specifically what he lied about. Then show us the facts that support your argument that Bush is going to lose.
You are having difficulty separating fact from hope.
Yes. Hope may spring eternal, but the facts are the facts. Poor sad confused liberal. You make me cry. I will pray for your brain to get an upgrade from god.
Christ-Almighty..another yahoo-runaway. no proof, no manners, no brains= short USMB lifespan
sample lie: iraq was an imminent threat to US
...funny thing about lying: it only takes one to make you a liar
we'll check facts in November...
thanks for pinning me as a liberal after 2 sentances on this board...that kind of ignorance from existing members = short USMB lifespan
save your tears & prayers for someone else...maybe yourself when you realize it's moderates like me who W has alienated and will strip him of office
Give it up.
Bush NEVER said that the Iraq threat was imminent. What he said in the 2003 STOTU address is that we needed to act before the threat became imminent.
Certain media outlets and anti-Bush groups have spun an urban myth.
2002 STOTU Transcript
Some have said we must not act until the threat is imminent. Since when have terrorists and tyrants announced their intentions, politely putting us on notice before they strike? If this threat is permitted to fully and suddenly emerge, all actions, all words, and all recriminations would come too late. Trusting in the sanity and restraint of Saddam Hussein is not a strategy, and it is not an option.
Separate names with a comma.