Genesis Correlates With Science

PoliticalChic

Diamond Member
Gold Supporting Member
Oct 6, 2008
124,904
60,285
2,300
Brooklyn, NY
1. God’s first command in Genesis is “Let there be light.” Nor is this the only introduction of light in the Genesis creation account, but it is the first, it represents the beginning of the formation of our solar system.




2. The Sumarians believed that the earth lay at the center of the universe, and the ancient Israelites saw the stars as a heavenly sphere that enclosed everything.

3. The idea that th earth is round emerged some time after the Old Testament was written, when in the late sixth century BCE Pythagoras declared that the earth, along with the other planets, was spherical.

a. In 287 BCE, Strato of Lampsacus’ school “advanced the theory that the sun was at rest at the center of the sphere of fixed stars, and that the earth and planets revolved around the sun.”
Greek Astronomy




4. Then, in the 20th century, Einstein advanced his theory of general relativity, the implication of which was that the universe was not static- it must be expanding or contracting.

a. An understanding of the red shift pretty much established an expanding universe. With this came the realization that there must have been a beginning.

5. And that was ‘The Big Bang’…some 13,700 million years ago. Quite an event…it lasted just 10 to the minus 35th seconds, beginning the universe, generating time and space, as well as all the matter and energy that the universe would ever, ever, contain!

6. The basic forces of nature emerged- first gravity, then the strong force that holds the nuclei of atoms together (no atoms existed at this time), followed by weaker, then ‘electromagnetic’ forces. By the end of the firs second, there were quarks and electrons, nutrinos, some other stuff….and, later, some of them smashed together to form protons and neutrons.





7. So, there we have the idea of the universe suddenly appearing at a beginning, and all of that from a huge amount of energy. Of course, that doesn’t begin to ask the obvious: what existed before the Big Bang, and where did all that energy come from?

8. And, of course, the ancient Israelites behind the account of creation in Genesis, chapter 1, would have been oblivious to all the detailed described above. No idea about any ‘Big Bang.’

9. Probably anyone writing a creation account should have begun with the idea of the formation of the sun and the planets….shouldn’t they? Without the sun…how could Genesis refer to the ‘days’ of creation? So…“Let there be light” doesn’t really entail much….does it? It makes intuitive sense: light needs the sun....doesn't it?

a. Even the pagan world figured this out: most tended to worship the sun as the source of all life.
But Genesis doesn’t speak of the sun…..only of light, until verses 14-19.





10. Big Bang…explosion….energy….light. But no atoms to form the sun for some time. Light…but no sun? So says science. And so says Genesis.
Parker, “The Genesis Enigma,” chapter two.

a. For reference, Genesis 1, verses 1-4: In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth. And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters. And God said, Let there be light: and there was light. And God saw the light, that it was good: and God divided the light from the darkness.




Interesting? Modern scientific narrative and biblical narrative seem to agree here.
LIght....energy....but no sun...


But there’s more in the Genesis author’s narrative. There follows an order of events of the creation.
A pretty specific order of events.
And it’s surprisingly accurate.
 
then you should start accepting sceince

"sceince"?

You mean a spiritualist meeting to receive spirit communications?

Where you speak to relatives who have passed on?

Sounds neat.

Like this:

Hillary Clinton says imaginary talks just ‘intellectual exercise’, The Providence Journal Bulletin, Tuesday, 6/25/96, p. A3. “Hillary Rodham Clinton said yesterday her imaginary conversations with Eleanor Roosevelt were merely an ‘intellectual exercise’ … Trying to douse what she called ‘sensational’ speculation, the first lady rejected inferences that psychic researcher Jean Houston, who led her in several White House sessions, was her ‘spiritual adviser’.”

“In a written statement, Mrs. Clinton was firm in her denial that there were any psychic or religious overtones to the sessions. ‘The bottom line is: I have no spiritual advisers or any other alternatives to my deeply held Methodist faith and traditions upon which I have relied since childhood.’ ”

“Mrs. Clinton met with Houston several times from late 1994 until March of this year, according to a new book [by Bob Woodward, 'The Choice'] that says Houston led the first lady through imaginary conversations with her hero, Mrs. Roosevelt and Indian leader … Ghandi … Mrs. Clinton said she engaged in hours of ‘freewheeling discussions’ with Houston.”
Say Anything Hillary Clinton Held Seances In The White House » Say Anything



Heck...if it's good enough for you, and for Hill....maybe I should try it!
 
then you should start accepting sceince

"sceince"?

You mean a spiritualist meeting to receive spirit communications?

Where you speak to relatives who have passed on?

Sounds neat.

Like this:

Hillary Clinton says imaginary talks just ‘intellectual exercise’, The Providence Journal Bulletin, Tuesday, 6/25/96, p. A3. “Hillary Rodham Clinton said yesterday her imaginary conversations with Eleanor Roosevelt were merely an ‘intellectual exercise’ … Trying to douse what she called ‘sensational’ speculation, the first lady rejected inferences that psychic researcher Jean Houston, who led her in several White House sessions, was her ‘spiritual adviser’.”

“In a written statement, Mrs. Clinton was firm in her denial that there were any psychic or religious overtones to the sessions. ‘The bottom line is: I have no spiritual advisers or any other alternatives to my deeply held Methodist faith and traditions upon which I have relied since childhood.’ ”

“Mrs. Clinton met with Houston several times from late 1994 until March of this year, according to a new book [by Bob Woodward, 'The Choice'] that says Houston led the first lady through imaginary conversations with her hero, Mrs. Roosevelt and Indian leader … Ghandi … Mrs. Clinton said she engaged in hours of ‘freewheeling discussions’ with Houston.”
Say Anything Hillary Clinton Held Seances In The White House » Say Anything



Heck...if it's good enough for you, and for Hill....maybe I should try it!

Hmm, maybe you do need a bit of magic, magic mushrooms might open your mind and expand your shtick which has become so predictable as to be hackneyed. Try a guided fantasy, it might, just might, make you more human and less a self righteous curmudgeon.
 
then you should start accepting sceince

"sceince"?

You mean a spiritualist meeting to receive spirit communications?

Where you speak to relatives who have passed on?

Sounds neat.

Like this:

Hillary Clinton says imaginary talks just ‘intellectual exercise’, The Providence Journal Bulletin, Tuesday, 6/25/96, p. A3. “Hillary Rodham Clinton said yesterday her imaginary conversations with Eleanor Roosevelt were merely an ‘intellectual exercise’ … Trying to douse what she called ‘sensational’ speculation, the first lady rejected inferences that psychic researcher Jean Houston, who led her in several White House sessions, was her ‘spiritual adviser’.”

“In a written statement, Mrs. Clinton was firm in her denial that there were any psychic or religious overtones to the sessions. ‘The bottom line is: I have no spiritual advisers or any other alternatives to my deeply held Methodist faith and traditions upon which I have relied since childhood.’ ”

“Mrs. Clinton met with Houston several times from late 1994 until March of this year, according to a new book [by Bob Woodward, 'The Choice'] that says Houston led the first lady through imaginary conversations with her hero, Mrs. Roosevelt and Indian leader … Ghandi … Mrs. Clinton said she engaged in hours of ‘freewheeling discussions’ with Houston.”
Say Anything Hillary Clinton Held Seances In The White House » Say Anything



Heck...if it's good enough for you, and for Hill....maybe I should try it!

Hmm, maybe you do need a bit of magic, magic mushrooms might open your mind and expand your shtick which has become so predictable as to be hackneyed. Try a guided fantasy, it might, just might, make you more human and less a self righteous curmudgeon.



"...so predictable..."

Again! You win the "Lack of The Gift of Irony" award of the day!!!

Another one of your insipid- and predictable- posts where you run from the OP, and make me subject of your post.




What a dunce you are....
....on the other hand, I do kinda like being the subject...Thanks.


Remember: "Awesome" ends with 'me,' ...and "Ugly" begins with 'u.'
 
Thank you for finding that. I've seen it many times before, but never when I wanted to use it.

The order of events as described in Genesis is scientifically accurate, and could not have happened any other way.

How did they know? Way back when the books of the Bible were being written, how did they know the exact order in which the world was formed?
 
Capitalism is not a religious belief. Socialism on the other hand believes in the faith that the government is a substitute for God.
 
Thank you for finding that. I've seen it many times before, but never when I wanted to use it.

The order of events as described in Genesis is scientifically accurate, and could not have happened any other way.

How did they know? Way back when the books of the Bible were being written, how did they know the exact order in which the world was formed?

Exactly!

And it is astounding.
 
there is no proof god exsists.
There's no proof the Big Bang Theory happened either.

There are two theories. The Big Bang and Continuous Creation. Scientific knowledge, mostly recent through the Hubble telescope evidences that the Big Bang is the most likely to be correct. The Universe is still expanding.

Scientific advancements show that there was an anomaly that caused the Big Bang, but not what that anomaly was.

The way the logic goes is: We know that the universe was created by a Big Bang but not what the Big Bang was. We do know that it wasn't a non-existent God. How do we know that? Because there was a Big Bang.

The circular logic can go on forever and is impenetrable.
 
Thank you for finding that. I've seen it many times before, but never when I wanted to use it.

The order of events as described in Genesis is scientifically accurate, and could not have happened any other way.

How did they know? Way back when the books of the Bible were being written, how did they know the exact order in which the world was formed?


Tomorrow I'll put us a post re: creation of the seas.....that is, if Ms. Truthie will allow it.
 
1. God’s first command in Genesis is “Let there be light.” Nor is this the only introduction of light in the Genesis creation account, but it is the first, it represents the beginning of the formation of our solar system.

Maybe Genesis meant the sun coming up every morning, which is still only a theory by the way. Who was this Genesis anyway? Was he a white guy too?

How about breakfast? You like bacon? :wink_2:
 

Forum List

Back
Top