Gaza to become land of Jewish settlements

Neither Israel nor its genocidal Land Thieves / psycho-Settlers will know a moment's peace if Netanyahu's genocidal agenda includes expelling Gaza's native residents and repopulating Gaza with murderous "Settlers".(1)

There are about 2.7 Billion Muslims in the world, many of whom will be avenging the systematic extermination of Gaza's civilian men, women and mainly children for generations.


"Israel Must Loudly Arrest the Murderous West Bank Settlers"

EXCERPT "Since Hamas’ Oct. 7 attack, settlers there have killed more than 120 Palestinians and injured at least 2,000. They have forcibly expelled more than 800 Palestinians from their homes, blown up their generators and solar panels, and burned down tents of Bedouin herders.

Again: This has been going on not in Gaza but in the West Bank—which is governed by the Palestinian Authority, not by Hamas. Some of those killed were members of militant groups, but most were attacked simply because they were Palestinians. In any case, they had nothing to do with Hamas’ attack on Israel from Gaza." CONTINUED

Islamists threaten violence and blame the infidel, that's news.

What was the excuse for violence, before any Zionist ever shot a single bullet?
 
Last edited:
Islamists threaten violence and blame the infidel, that's news.

What was the excuse for violence, before any Zionist ever shot a single bullet?
There was little violence until the Zionists showed up. You’d know this if you weren’t a bigot and read the real history rather than propaganda.
 
There was little violence until the Zionists showed up. You’d know this if you weren’t a bigot and read the real history rather than propaganda.

Maybe according to your twisted measurement...where slavery and violence against minorities under Muslim rule is the accepted norm. But it were the Muslim massacres that initiated the Zionist liberation movement.

(QUESTION)

What was the Arab excuse for violence,
before any Zionist ever shot a bullet?

Report from Safed about the Arab massacres of 1834:

"Now I have come to announce the large losses and afflictions that have been created in Israel in four countries, ie Jerusalem,and Hebron and the Upper Galilee, namely Safed. And the lower Galilee, namely the city of Tabriya. By the hands of the plunderers and looters that rose in the country. And they come only upon the Jews...

On Sunday, eight days in the month of Sivan, the looters, inhabitants of the villages joined with the inhabitants of the cities. They had weapons of war and shields and fell upon all the Jews and stripped their clothes from men and women. They expelled them naked from the city, and plundered all their property...

The remnants were coerced and raped whether men or women. Tore all the Torah scrolls, and their talit and tefilin and the city was abandoned... This was so for 33 days, so was done in the city of Safed, so was done in other towns."


Periodicals of people of Israel in Eretz Israel - Menachem Mendel ben- Aaharon 1800-1873
 
Maybe according to your twisted measurement...where slavery and violence against minorities under Muslim rule is the accepted norm. But it were the Muslim massacres that initiated the Zionist liberation movement.

(QUESTION)

What was the Arab excuse for violence,
before any Zionist ever shot a bullet?
There can be no doubt atrocities were committed by both sides. However as you know the Palestinians were kicked off their land and thousands were killed and displaced, so that the state of Israel could exist. Does this mean nothing?
 
There can be no doubt atrocities were committed by both sides. However as you know the Palestinians were kicked off their land and thousands were killed and displaced, so that the state of Israel could exist. Does this mean nothing?

What both sides?

Specifically - before any
Zionist ever shot a single bullet,
what was the excuse for Arab violence?
 
Do you read my posts?

Was it me who claimed there was "little violence" before Zionism,
and immediately changed it to atrocities "on both sides"?
Took only 2 posts to contradict your narrative.

So what are those atrocities "on both sides"
and what was the Arab excuse for
violence - before Zionism?
 
Was it me who claimed there was "little violence" before Zionism,
and immediately changed it to atrocities "on both sides"?
Took only 2 posts to contradict your narrative.

So what are those atrocities "on both sides"
and what was the Arab excuse for
violence - before Zionism?
When did the Zionists show up?
 
When did the Zionists show up?

Zionism was organized in response to the Arab pogroms,
specifically in the Levant and throughout the Caliphate,
as mentioned above, in my previous post.

Jews in Morocco were still enslaved,
that is, in the 20th century.

 
There was little violence until the Zionists showed up. You’d know this if you weren’t a bigot and read the real history rather than propaganda.
The violence and hatred up when the Palestinian Mufti joined the Nazis and commit terror and genocide on Jews in their own religious and ancestral holy land.

 
When did the Zionists show up?
Jews have always maintained a presence. The Ottoman Turks who controlled the land for about 600 years, invited Jews escaping the inquisitions and pogroms to come back to their holy land. At some point in the late 1800’s, Jews were a majority in Jerusalem according to the Ottoman census.
 

Israel loses control of its borders​

In past wars, Israel was able to establish buffer or security zones inside enemy territory. But Tel Aviv's adversaries have flipped the map today, forcing the occupation state to evacuate its own borders — perhaps permanently.
67ba51e6-ba0f-11ee-961e-00163e02c055.jpeg


Failed objectives and the northern front


". . . Preliminary reports from settler councils in the north assessed settler “displacement” to be around 70,000 in the initial weeks of the conflict. Subsequent reports, however, suggest a vastly higher figure of approximately 230,000.

Against this backdrop, Hezbollah Secretary-General Hassan Nasrallah emphasized a crucial point in his 3 January speech. He referenced Israeli Defense Minister Yoav Gallant's concern that Israelis are not only reluctant to reside in the border regions, but that their apprehension about remaining in any part of Israel will also likely rise if Tel Aviv's war fails to achieve its stated objectives.

Indeed, since 7 October, a significant toll has been exacted on Israeli forces, with 13,572 "soldiers and civilians" wounded in the battles in Gaza and along the northern border with Lebanon, as reported by Yedioth Ahronoth.

One suspects those numbers may be underreported. Skepticism has recently grown over the accuracy of the Israeli Ministry of Health's data, with various experts, independent sources, and media investigations suggesting a considerably higher casualty count. The IDF Handicapped Organization, for example, estimates that approximately 20,000 individuals have been disabled in the ongoing war — a number much higher than the health ministry's findings.

The secrecy surrounding Israeli casualties is particularly evident on the Lebanese war front, where data is virtually nonexistent, and Tel Aviv's military censorship tightly controls all information flows. This leads to a critical question regarding Israel's ability to establish strategic "border" equations as a compensatory measure for what appears to be a military and political setback in achieving its stated war goals — which include the elimination of Hamas and the release of all captives.

Moreover, doubts arise about Israel's capacity to wage a major war in the north given its clear shortcomings in its southern military campaign, in which it faced heavily besieged adversaries with multiple vulnerabilities. The Lebanese resistance, in comparison to its Gazan counterparts, boasts considerable and many unknown military capabilities, which it can exercise from within a sovereign state that is neither besieged nor landlocked. Furthermore, Hezbollah, which singlehandedly routed Israel from its territories in both 2000 and 2006 — makes it plain that it has thus far revealed and utilized only a fraction of its new military capabilities.


Decolonization in progress

In November, Hezbollah's introduction of the Burkan missile, a domestically-made weapon with a range of up to 10 kilometers and destructive power of 500 kilograms of explosives, adds a potent dimension to the confrontation.

While Hezbollah has primarily targeted Israeli military barracks and troop gatherings with the Burkan, hundreds of guided missiles such as Kornet and Katyusha rockets have been employed with precision against specific targets within empty residential settlements, extending up to 10 kilometers in geographic depth from Lebanon's border. . . . "
0bea13b6-ba0e-11ee-a5f4-00163e02c055.png
Nice fantasy on this article's author. Yes, North and South are a this time having to put its population in a safer place in Israel.

It will all go back to normal when the war is over and it is safe to return.

BTW, Israel is NOT a colonial state. It is the Indigenous Ancient Jewish Homeland.

One CANNOT colonize one's own ancient homeland. And the Palestinians, who are Arabs from Arabia, are definitely the colonizers not only of the region called Palestine, but much of Asia and all of North Africa.


Decolonize North Africa, Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, Jordan from the 1400 years of Muslim Arab and Turkish conquest and colonization.
 
So many people against each other in this world. Sadly, it has always been this way.
 

Forum List

Back
Top