Qball
Corner Pocket
I wouldn't get too cocky about the divorce rate with hetero couples. I don't know how many studies have been done on divorce with gay marriages in the U.S., but in Denmark and Sweden they have divorced at higher rates than heterosexual couples, and before somebody mentions MA having the lowest divorce rate in the country since they legalized gay marriage, I'll just add that MA also has some of the toughest divorce laws in the country. It's hard to dissolve a marriage in MA...for everyone. But there's no reason to believe that the rate of successful gay couples will be any higher than the rate of heterosexual couples.
The fact is, the success rates shouldn't apply. That's the whole point of citing the divorce rate, simply to show that if you're going to call an institution a great success, you sorta need a basis for saying so.
Who's calling marriage a great success?
I mean, really. You can say they're (gays) aren't discriminated against, but they are. They're not allowed to affirm their Relationship legally and achieve the same legal benefits straights are. That's not equality, and there's no reason provided to date that's a logical one, the fact that we dismiss them doesn't mean they were "good" but we're "closed minded," it simply means they don't fly in the realm of logic.
Equality for the sake of equality isn't a good argument, though. It's actually a stupid argument, considering you can say the same thing about polygamous couples and nobody is pushing for the legalization of those. There's no right to "affirm their relationship legally". You say you don't hear any good arguments against gay marriage? That's because you're working under your own messed up assumptions about what is and what isn't a right. Just tacking on the word "rights" to something doesn't make it so.
Your taboos are like really really dark glasses. They make it hard to see. Anyone opposing your point of view, you're calling them closed minded, that, in-turn, is closed mindedness.
Some people are closed-minded, some people are just stupid. It's harder to reason with stupid people working under their own assumptions that aren't based in fact all while they ask you to only present facts and logic.