R
rdean
Guest
What part of "Pay to the order of GlaxoSmithKline" on a US Treasury check and funding it with a Chinese VISA card is tough to understand?
Face it. If PAYGO had not been allowed to expire and Bush and The Good Ol' Boys of the Class of '03 had been required to fund Medicare D, and that ginormous tax cut, and the waste of resources blowing shit up in Iraq with cuts in spending or new taxes elsewhere, America's house would be in order now.
Bush and the class of '03 opened up the flood-gates and instead of "changing the fundamental way Washington does business" Obama and the classes of '09 going forward are joyfully pissing in the pond and laughing all the way to the bank that services the campaign contribution account.
The difference between a Republican and a Democrat? 5 lbs. and a mustache.
Not true:
Typical group of Republicans (mostly white):
Typical group of future Democrats (everyone else):
You have me laughing at the joke but far to many are still buying in to this kind of partisan bullshit and that's not funny.
Quite the conundrum.
Even though I thought the pictures were funny, the racial make-up of the Republican Party isn't. From Gallup, notice only 2% are black and 4% other. Among the Hispanics, how many of those are actually white? Add in a plus or minus and the number of whites could actually be GREATER than 90%.
When people say, "Oh, but the Democratic Party is 65% white. A "thinking" person will notice the divisions in that 65% white. The gays, the feminists, scientists, college professors, teachers, poor white, educated whites, uneducated whites, Muslim whites, the vast majority of Hispanic whites, liberals, conservatives and so on ---> and that's just among the whites. All with a seperate agenda working together to form a single party. Anyone who says a political party with this many sharply defined divisions all follow the same agenda is either too indoctrinated to see the truth or is just plain stupid. What else could it be?
Last edited by a moderator: