Garland warns of threats to democracy

[struth]

No. They interpret laws in the event of “cases or controversies” where they have jurisdiction to do so. They don’t say what the law is.

The legislature, in making the laws, is the body that says what the law is. Courts are subservient TO the law as long as the law is Constitutional.

haha when they interpt it, what do they do?

no the legislature doesn’t say what the law is, they make laws all the time the courts say aren’t the law.

 

[BackAgain]

haha when they interpt it, what do they do?

no the legislature doesn’t say what the law is, they make laws all the time the courts say aren’t the law.

Ha ha. They interpret it. It already exists. They aren’t saying what “it” is. They are simply ruling on aspects of the thing that already exists. For example, if law A somehow conflicts with law B, they get to determine how to prioritize the two laws’ applications. Or, if law C conflicts with an individual’s pre-existing Constitutionally guaranteed right, the courts can say that the law is either voided or that it has to be limited in its application. Again, they are dealing with the law that already exists. They don’t say what the law “is” unless they say that it is now “void.” And even that is merely bending the knee to the higher law, our Constitution.

Of course it’s the legislature that says what the law is. And it’s that law which the courts have to deal with. The courts simply don’t say what the law is. The very claim that they do was a basically political claim made by a court to help shape the shape authority of the court. It is simply silly to accept the claim as phrased.

 

[struth]

Ha ha. They interpret it. It already exists. They aren’t saying what “it” is. They are simply ruling on aspects of the thing that already exists. For example, if law A somehow conflicts with law B, they get to determine how to prioritize the two laws’ applications. Or, if law C conflicts with an individual’s pre-existing Constitutionally guaranteed right, the courts can say that the law is either voided or that it has to be limited in its application. Again, they are dealing with the law that already exists. They don’t say what the law “is” unless they say that it is now “void.” And even that is merely bending the knee to the higher law, our Constitution.

Of course it’s the legislature that says what the law is. And it’s that law which the courts have to deal with. The courts simply don’t say what the law is. The very claim that they do was a basically political claim made by a court to help shape the shape authority of the court. It is simply silly to accept the claim as phrased.

Of course they are saying what it is, that's what the word interpret means. Yes, whatever they are reviewing already exist, and at times they interpret it to say it's not the law....

I mean geez this is common knowledge, the legislative branch is not above the law.

 

[BackAgain]

Of course they are saying what it is, that's what the word interpret means. Yes, whatever they are reviewing already exist, and at times they interpret it to say it's not the law....

I mean geez this is common knowledge, the legislative branch is not above the law.

No. That’s not what “interpret” means.

Your miscomprehnsion is not common knowledge. It’s a continuing error based on an old case which suffered from an overly broad claim about what the province of the courts is.

Of course the legislative branch is not above the law. And it shouldn’t be. I already noted that any law they pass that is in derogation of the Constitution is void. As it should be.

But the courts are also not above the law. Indeed, they are bound by the law.

 

[struth]

No. That’s not what “interpret” means.

Your miscomprehnsion is not common knowledge. It’s a continuing error based on an old case which suffered from an overly broad claim about what the province of the courts is.

Of course the legislative branch is not above the law. And it shouldn’t be. I already noted that any law they pass that is in derogation of the Constitution is void. As it should be.

But the courts are also not above the law. Indeed, they are bound by the law.

and who says that law is void?

and thus not law?

 

[Clipper]

Doesn't matter. Remember their goal:

Bannon is a conman, grifter & a lowlife just like the ahole who pardoned him.

 

[Mac1958]

Bannon is a conman, grifter & a lowlife just like the ahole who pardoned him.

And he's winning. All this statewide stuff is his strategy.

 

[LordBrownTrout]

Garland is a threat to the country and the constitution.

 

[Calypso Jones]

Leftist marxists and deep state rinos. This woman knows the deal. Share this with the leftist(marxists) in your life.


Left has been working on this for a long long time.

 

[task0778]

Merrick Garland warned of threats to US democracy, citing violence including the 2021 riot at the Capitol by supporters of former President Donald Trump, rollbacks in voting rights and possible legislative efforts to overturn the outcome of elections.
“A democracy cannot survive if its citizens forsake the rule of law in favor of violence or threats of violence,” Garland said in a commencement speech Sunday at Harvard University, his alma mater.

MSN

www.msn.com

Comment:
Do you think that Garland is paranoid and delusional, or is he a political partisan hack propagandist?
Voter Fraud and Election Rigging Crimes are the threat to our democracy.
Illegally using the FBI, DOJ, CIA, FISA Courts and the IRS as political weapons is a threat to our democracy.
Censorship of dissenting opinions is a threat to our democracy.
Using the DOJ as a political weapon to brand dissenters as "domestic terrorists" and "white supremists" is a threat to our democracy.
Calling election laws that protect everyone's Right to Vote from voter fraud "voter suppression" is a threat to our democracy.
It looks like the Democrats are who "forsake the rule of law"
They are creating a one party police state where people can be arrested and imprisoned for their political beliefs.
The Democrats are like an Orwellian Nightmare coming true.

I am sooo glad this SOB is not on our Supreme Court.

 

[scruffy]

Merrick Garland warned of threats to US democracy, citing violence including the 2021 riot at the Capitol by supporters of former President Donald Trump, rollbacks in voting rights and possible legislative efforts to overturn the outcome of elections.
“A democracy cannot survive if its citizens forsake the rule of law in favor of violence or threats of violence,” Garland said in a commencement speech Sunday at Harvard University, his alma mater.

MSN

www.msn.com

Comment:
Do you think that Garland is paranoid and delusional, or is he a political partisan hack propagandist?
Voter Fraud and Election Rigging Crimes are the threat to our democracy.
Illegally using the FBI, DOJ, CIA, FISA Courts and the IRS as political weapons is a threat to our democracy.
Censorship of dissenting opinions is a threat to our democracy.
Using the DOJ as a political weapon to brand dissenters as "domestic terrorists" and "white supremists" is a threat to our democracy.
Calling election laws that protect everyone's Right to Vote from voter fraud "voter suppression" is a threat to our democracy.
It looks like the Democrats are who "forsake the rule of law"
They are creating a one party police state where people can be arrested and imprisoned for their political beliefs.
The Democrats are like an Orwellian Nightmare coming true.

Fuck this idiot Garland. ^^^

This asshole violates the Constitution and his oath of office on a daily basis, and he's going to lecture us about democracy?

Fuck this idiot.

What a bunch of SCUMBAGS these leftists are

 

[B. Kidd]

Fuck this idiot Garland. ^^^

This asshole violates the Constitution and his oath of office on a daily basis, and he's going to lecture us about democracy?

Fuck this idiot.

What a bunch of SCUMBAGS these leftists are

He needs to be impeached along with Mayorkas at the first possible opportunity.

 

[mudwhistle]

Fuck this idiot Garland. ^^^

This asshole violates the Constitution and his oath of office on a daily basis, and he's going to lecture us about democracy?

Fuck this idiot.

What a bunch of SCUMBAGS these leftists are

They claim anyone who stops them from rigging elections is a threat to democracy.