GALLUP (per Drudge) says it could be HISTORIC!

[Dick Tuck]

Mickey Mouse tried to register to vote in Florida, but Orange County elections officials rejected his application, which had an ACORN stamp on it.

So where is this ACORN stamp?

And you're proving my point. This is what everyone brings up, but NO ONE has ever had a single instance of a fraudulent vote cast based on an ACORN registration.

I'll give you this..... you are a loyal little drone.

I'm waiting to see the voter registration card that was issued for that application.

 

[Liability]

Dick Less wants PROOF.

"PROOF, I say! Proof! PROOF! PROOF!!!!!"

What a fucking dill.



You have been thoroughly exposed in this thread, Dick Less.

Move can along, now, you fraudulent piece of shit.

 

[keee keee]

It's going to be a blood bath!!!! I can't wait to see the Dems and Obama supports loose!!!!

 

[Liability]

Nope, fatface, Drudge linked to a Washington Examiner opinion piece where you found your Headline.

Gallup isn't the problem, it's your embellished yet simple minded analysis of what you found on the Gallup site.

Wrong lardass. It linked to Gallup and what gallup found in its polling.

Are you suggesting, in your boundless ignorance and stupidity, that the Washington Examiner fucked up its reporting of what Gallup said, you moron?

You can't dispute the poll, you bombastic liberoiudal simpleton, so you play the ever popular liberoidal game of "attack the messenger."

Sarah Grunts: Drudge "bad!"

You're not even up to delivering the correct message without placing the Neoconish and pathetic meme into motion.

You should learn from your mistakes. You are so bad at predicting congressional and presidential races. I actually felt sorry for pathetic you after a few elections.

You lib frauds get extra points every time you use the over-ployed term "meme!"

Good on you, Grunt.

And, since you are a plain old douche (vinegar and water, apparently) I will take pity on you and educate your pathetic ass.

I am making -- and I have made -- no predictions. If you'd learn to read carefully, and if you had the capacity to comprehend, you'd have already noted as much.

But, you are a douche, so that's that, evidently.

 

[Liability]

It's like this, oh penis obsessed one. * * * *

The only one obsessed with your hypothetical penis, is you Dick Less.

Thus, your username.

Once again, you show your ignorance of American History. You must have been in Blutto's class.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V8lT1o0sDwI]YouTube - Animal House: Germans Bombed Pearl Harbor[/ame]

Wow. Another baseless (and of course unsupported) myopic claim from Dick Less.

Who'd a thunked it?

Everyone.

And you spelled Bluto incorrectly, too, you stupid dried-out syphilis-wrecked clit.

 

[The T]

I think it will be hilarious.

Imagine, a Republican agenda:

Attack gays.

Attack Hispanics.

Attack Muslims.

End Social Security.

End Medicare.

Privatize the VA.

Move more jobs to China.

End unemployment.

Cut taxes on millionaires and billionaires.

Shut down government.

The following is a list Republican ideas to create jobs in THIS country:

1.........

You do realize that your stupidity is showing, don't you?

That's because deany is a welfare stooge...a recipient of welfare, and he's scared as HELL he's going to lose it.

 

[Dick Tuck]

Dick Less wants PROOF.

"PROOF, I say! Proof! PROOF! PROOF!!!!!"

What a fucking dill.



You have been thoroughly exposed in this thread, Dick Less.

Move can along, now, you fraudulent piece of shit.

So was an actual registration given for that application? Or is this still part of your smoke screen to justify suppressing the votes of the poor, blacks, and Hispanics?

 

[Liability]

Dick Less wants PROOF.

"PROOF, I say! Proof! PROOF! PROOF!!!!!"

What a fucking dill.



You have been thoroughly exposed in this thread, Dick Less.

Move can along, now, you fraudulent piece of shit.

So was an actual registration given for that application? Or is this still part of your smoke screen to justify suppressing the votes of the poor, blacks, and Hispanics?

"Proof! PROOF! PROOF!!!!"

Sorry Dick Less, but as you know or should know, the problem is much more complicated than that.

Asshole scumbag frauds like you pretend that there isn't "really" a problem by asking bogus questions like "how many people have been convicted of voter fraud?"

* * * *

In written testimony for a June 6 hearing conducted by the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, William Welch, chief of the Public Integrity Section of the Justice Department’s Criminal Division, noted that in the almost six years since Ashcroft launched the voter fraud initiative, the department had convicted 111 defendants for fraud offenses out of a total 148 who were charged. Vice Chair Abigail Thernstrom complained of “a lack of really solid data on the dimensions of the voter fraud problem.” When Welch testified in person, Thernstrom, a Republican, and commissioner Todd Gaziano, a conservative independent, pressed for detail.

“I don’t think that anyone can quantify the problem through simply looking at criminal convictions and trying to equate the scope of the problem with the number of convictions,” Welch replied.

How many schemes don’t come to light?

Welch: “It is extremely difficult to quantify or give an estimate on what the scope is.”

Just how large of a problem is noncitizen voting?

Welch: “I really cannot give you an estimate of either how small or how large it is. It simply is an unquantifiable figure as far as we’re concerned.”

Welch did introduce as evidence some figures on multiple registrations. He said that 100,000 Floridians were registered simultaneously in either New York or New Jersey and that 60,000 Kentuckians were also registered across the border in Tennessee. But Welch did note that many such cases can be attributed to messy voter rolls rather than fraudulent behavior. Another witness, Hans von Spakovsky, a former member of the Federal Election Commission, referred to a University of Connecticut study that found 8,558 of Connecticut’s deceased on voter rolls; more than 300 were listed as having voted after they had died. Connecticut’s secretary of state announced in a press conference that no fraud had occurred, but that 5,000 names have been removed from the Connecticut rolls. Currently, Connecticut’s separate Elections Enforcement Commission is looking one-by-one into the cases in which votes were actually cast for any signs of voter fraud.

* * * *

Broken Elections, Stolen Votes - The Center for Public Integrity

That's just an excerpt. If you had a brain or even an ounce of integrity, Dick Less, you would want to read the entire piece.

 

[jillian]

Interestingly, I just looked at Gallop's actual site and no such thing was said. They said the 'GOP is well-positioned'.

But I'm sure y'all love the echo chamber.

Election 2010, Politics, Daily Election Tracking, Race for Congress, Generic Ballot

Interestingly, the polls are fairly close, but Gallop is making certain assumptions about voter turnout which are skewing their numbers

The reality is that EVERY time one party has all branches, the midterm election thereafter reverses who holds at least one house.

But keep on tearing your underwear over it. IT's fun to laugh at cause rightwingnuts are sore losers AND sore winnes. *shrug*

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

So basically, if we saw numbers like 1894, even you would realize how stupid your comment just was.:

We aren't going to see numbers like 1894. This poll is an outlier.

 

[Liability]

Interestingly, I just looked at Gallop's actual site and no such thing was said. They said the 'GOP is well-positioned'.

But I'm sure y'all love the echo chamber.

Election 2010, Politics, Daily Election Tracking, Race for Congress, Generic Ballot

Interestingly, the polls are fairly close, but Gallop is making certain assumptions about voter turnout which are skewing their numbers

The reality is that EVERY time one party has all branches, the midterm election thereafter reverses who holds at least one house.

But keep on tearing your underwear over it. IT's fun to laugh at cause rightwingnuts are sore losers AND sore winnes. *shrug*

Wrong.

In the first place, as I correctly noted in my thread headline, Drudge put the label on it. Per Drudge.

Secondly, the point is that this election looks to potentially be much more favorable for the "out" party (in this instance, that's the GOP, of course) than "normal.

Thirdly, your "stats" are erroneous. The 2002 midterms saw the GOP proportion of both houses INCREASE.

Finally, EVERY poll has to make certain base assumptions. The spin cycle requires that the Party about to get hosed (in this case the Dims) adjust the polling assumptions right about now. And indeed, that's what the "boys" are doing, going from "likely voters" to "registered voters" as the baseline in order to come up with rosier predictions for the "news" headlines in time to TRY to adjust the public perception (and -- they hope -- the ultimate outcome). It's a comparison of apples to oranges while pretending that they have been evaluating oranges all along.

While none of us will know for sure how it will turn out until Election Day (night), there is very good reason to believe that the Dims are gonna get THUMPED -- hard -- on Election day.

And they still will not learn.

 

[Liability]

So basically, if we saw numbers like 1894, even you would realize how stupid your comment just was.:

We aren't going to see numbers like 1894. This poll is an outlier.

"If" is not that difficult a word.

YOUR assurance that we "won't" see a certain outcome is not a valid basis to accept your assertion.

An outlier doesn't mean it is wrong. It merely means that it falls outside of the range of other predictions. But it could turn out to be the only one that is proved correct.

In any event, the fact is: I don't know and neither do you. Nobody does.

But SOME of the indications are looking real good for those of us who detest what the liberal Democratics have been doing.

IF (we need to use that term) it ultimately turns out that Dick Morris is closer to the truth than you seem to believe, then the House could turn hugely in favor of the GOP, in a result reminiscent of 1894!

Now, don't misunderstand me. I dislike Dick Morris. But he could still be right. And if he is, even the Senate could yet go to the Republicans.

We shall see.

 

[Rozman]

I think it will be hilarious.

Imagine, a Republican agenda:

Attack gays.

Attack Hispanics.

Attack Muslims.

End Social Security.

End Medicare.

Privatize the VA.

Move more jobs to China.

End unemployment.

Cut taxes on millionaires and billionaires.

Shut down government.

The following is a list Republican ideas to create jobs in THIS country:

1.........

You do realize that your stupidity is showing, don't you?

Obama's agenda where Americans need jobs.....

O' and wife go on vacation to a Broadway show....

Pass Health Care.....

Go overseas to push for Olympics and enjoy themselves there.

Comes home plays golf.....

works on Cap and tax....

plays golf....

Goes after Wall Street......

Goes on vacation.....

Goes overseas to apologize to the world for Americas arrogance.

Michelle goes to Spain....

O' plays golf.....

O' goes on Leno

O' goes on the View....

O' goes across the country bashing the right.

O' and the family go on vacation.

goes around the country bashing the Republicans
works on his stand up routine
plays some golf
campaigns for some Dems.

there is probably a few rounds of golf in here.....

Has anything been done to create jobs here?

 

[Dick Tuck]

It has been reported recently that the Democrats are targeting Absentee Voting and especially the Military vote with their fraud. So pay very close attention to Absentee Voting this time around. There will be some crazy things happening with that in November. Don't underestimate the "Community Organizers." They have been stealing elections for many many years. It's what they do.

They've been getting blacks, Hispanics, the poor, and virtually every other citizen to participate in our democracy. Right wingers hate that.

This post has been neg repped by Missourian.

 

[jillian]

Wrong.

In the first place, as I correctly noted in my thread headline, Drudge put the label on it. Per Drudge.

Secondly, the point is that this election looks to potentially be much more favorable for the "out" party (in this instance, that's the GOP, of course) than "normal.

Thirdly, your "stats" are erroneous. The 2002 midterms saw the GOP proportion of both houses INCREASE.

Finally, EVERY poll has to make certain base assumptions. The spin cycle requires that the Party about to get hosed (in this case the Dims) adjust the polling assumptions right about now. And indeed, that's what the "boys" are doing, going from "likely voters" to "registered voters" as the baseline in order to come up with rosier predictions for the "news" headlines in time to TRY to adjust the public perception (and -- they hope -- the ultimate outcome). It's a comparison of apples to oranges while pretending that they have been evaluating oranges all along.

While none of us will know for sure how it will turn out until Election Day (night), there is very good reason to believe that the Dims are gonna get THUMPED -- hard -- on Election day.

And they still will not learn.

Not wrong. Correct.

Drudge is a hack. Repeating 'per drudge' is still repeating incredibly misleading headlines by a hack.

I know what the point of the thread is. And the point differs from reality. Reality is that their will be gains, but for a clearer view of what those gains are, you might try looking at a real pollster like

Election Forecasts - FiveThirtyEight Blog - NYTimes.com

Nate Silver's analysis is that:

Our version of a House forecasting model, which uses both Gallup and other generic ballot polls, as well as a whole host of other inputs, suggests that such gains by the Republicans are theoretically possible — but rather unlikely.

Likely Voter Gap Favors G.O.P. by 6 Points; Gallup's Model Sees It Biggerage - NYTimes.com

assuming that generic polls translate into voter models is kind of self-serving.

btw, i am far from 'dim' by any calculation.

now, to me, dim is the tea party loons, so there ya go.

 

[Rozman]

It has been reported recently that the Democrats are targeting Absentee Voting and especially the Military vote with their fraud. So pay very close attention to Absentee Voting this time around. There will be some crazy things happening with that in November. Don't underestimate the "Community Organizers." They have been stealing elections for many many years. It's what they do.

They've been getting blacks, Hispanics, the poor, and virtually every other citizen to participate in our democracy. Right wingers hate that.

This post has been neg repped by Missourian.

Yeh those crazy right wingers....they tend to get a little annoyed when people just happen to find bags and bags of voters paper ballots in some guys car trunk that are 90 % for Franken.

 

[Charles_Main]

100 seems rather optimistic to me.

 

[Sarah G]

Wrong lardass. It linked to Gallup and what gallup found in its polling.

Are you suggesting, in your boundless ignorance and stupidity, that the Washington Examiner fucked up its reporting of what Gallup said, you moron?

You can't dispute the poll, you bombastic liberoiudal simpleton, so you play the ever popular liberoidal game of "attack the messenger."

Sarah Grunts: Drudge "bad!"

You're not even up to delivering the correct message without placing the Neoconish and pathetic meme into motion.

You should learn from your mistakes. You are so bad at predicting congressional and presidential races. I actually felt sorry for pathetic you after a few elections.

You lib frauds get extra points every time you use the over-ployed term "meme!"

Good on you, Grunt.

And, since you are a plain old douche (vinegar and water, apparently) I will take pity on you and educate your pathetic ass.

I am making -- and I have made -- no predictions. If you'd learn to read carefully, and if you had the capacity to comprehend, you'd have already noted as much.

But, you are a douche, so that's that, evidently.

Your Tourette syndrome flaring up again, Dear? Oh well, I see enough others have attempted to set your saggy butt straight so I'll leave you to your semi conscious and delusional mutterings.

One historical landslide for Rs on the horizon... Uh huh.

 

[Liability]

You're not even up to delivering the correct message without placing the Neoconish and pathetic meme into motion.

You should learn from your mistakes. You are so bad at predicting congressional and presidential races. I actually felt sorry for pathetic you after a few elections.

You lib frauds get extra points every time you use the over-ployed term "meme!"

Good on you, Grunt.

And, since you are a plain old douche (vinegar and water, apparently) I will take pity on you and educate your pathetic ass.

I am making -- and I have made -- no predictions. If you'd learn to read carefully, and if you had the capacity to comprehend, you'd have already noted as much.

But, you are a douche, so that's that, evidently.

Your Tourette syndrome flaring up again, Dear? Oh well, I see enough others have attempted to set your saggy butt straight so I'll leave you to your semi conscious and delusional mutterings.

One historical landslide for Rs on the horizon... Uh huh.

Noting your douchieness isn't akin to Tourette's Grunt.

Your Lard Ass seems to be suffocating your brain, severing it from its oxygen supply. So stand up, ya ignorant ho.

Anyway, it is very clear that you are suffering from your fear of what might happen in your petty little world if the socialists we laughingly label "Democrats" lose control of Congress. Good. Live with your fear. It's not just a dream.



The odds are actually quite good that at least the House is going out of your control. Not a fuckin' moment too soon.

 

[skookerasbil]

Yo Barnabus..........what about this Gallup poll????