From the dumbass minds that brought you Planned Parenthood...

[SuMar]

How is this healthy for the unsuspecting partner that is about to have sex with the HIV recipient?

Planned Parenthood Doesn?t Think Someone With AIDS Should Tell Their Sexual Partner First​

 

[BlackFlag]

Joe the Plumber for America? Are you fucking kidding me SuMar?

 

[SuMar]

Joe the Plumber for America? Are you fucking kidding me SuMar?

Typical punk liberal move. Deflecting from topic...Nice try, thanks for playing though.

 

[BlackFlag]

Joe the Plumber for America? Are you fucking kidding me SuMar?

Typical punk liberal move. Deflecting from topic...Nice try, thanks for playing though.

Thanks for being my fodder

 

[S.J.]

Planned Parenthood must be hoping more women will become pregnant by HIV partners and seek abortions as a solution.

 

[BlackFlag]

Planned Parenthood must be hoping more women will become pregnant by HIV partners and seek abortions as a solution.

Omg what you just said is so stupid on so many levels

 

[S.J.]

Planned Parenthood must be hoping more women will become pregnant by HIV partners and seek abortions as a solution.

Omg what you just said is so stupid on so many levels

And would Black Fag like to elaborate on that?

 

[Howey]

Joe the Plumber for America? Are you fucking kidding me SuMar?

Did he lose his cushy union job?

 

[Howey]

How is this healthy for the unsuspecting partner that is about to have sex with the HIV recipient?

Planned Parenthood Doesn?t Think Someone With AIDS Should Tell Their Sexual Partner First​

This isn't Planned Parenthood. It's International planned Parenthood, a different organization that deals with contraception on a worldwide basis.

Home - International Planned Parenthood Federation

It's interesting though that I can't find those phrases anywhere within that link.

Can you point them out?

 

[Howey]

Here it is. Of course, the advise is taken totally out of context. Typical for Erick Erickson, who created this faux outrage.

ISSUU - Healthy Happy Hot by IPPF

 

[Howey]

Ahhh...If only Bristol Palin had taken that advise...she wouldn't be dragging around her bastard child, the product of a drunken, underage fuck session.

 

[SuMar]

Here it is. Of course, the advise is taken totally out of context. Typical for Erick Erickson, who created this faux outrage.

ISSUU - Healthy Happy Hot by IPPF

​

According to your link, it shows that the HIV recipient can choose to or not disclose their disease.

Of course disclosing the information is the right (and only) thing to do. Encouraging these folks that it's a choice of if or when is careless and not safe. Not disclosing is putting the other partner at risk and should be considered a crime.

 

[SuMar]

Ahhh...If only Bristol Palin had taken that advise...she wouldn't be dragging around her bastard child, the product of a drunken, underage fuck session.

Where was it ever reported that she was drunk when having sex. You like pulling up links, pull that one up.

 

[Moonglow]

The statement never said you don't have to tell your partner , only that it is your right when to disclose. Many laws in countries, and in the US (the states), have laws about having to inform if you have HIV and you have sex..,

 

[SuMar]

The statement never said you don't have to tell your partner , only that it is your right when to disclose. Many laws in countries, and in the US (the states), have laws about having to inform if you have HIV and you have sex..,

There should not be an "if" or "when" when it comes to disclosing the HIV disease. The when should be before engaging in sex.

HIV infected man charged with 21 counts of recklessly risking infection | FOX2now.com

There maybe laws, but how good are the laws to these victims he infected because he chose to keep his mouth shut and not disclose his condition?

 

[emilynghiem]

How is this healthy for the unsuspecting partner that is about to have sex with the HIV recipient?

Planned Parenthood Doesn?t Think Someone With AIDS Should Tell Their Sexual Partner First​

RE: Healthy, Happy and Hot: A young people's guide to rights - International Planned Parenthood Federation

Hi Sumar:
One issue where the Left does take things out of context
is about Christian spiritual healing vs. occult and witchcraft practices.

The Left is publicly rallies AGAINST any kind of spiritual healing for homosexuality,
although this has saved lives of people for whom
their homosexual behavior was UNNATURAL and caused by ABUSE (not by birth).

Because of abuses of "conversion therapy by force" which is torture,
they want to ban ALL types of therapy.

So whenever the Left wants to make arguments AGAINST healing therapy
they bring up the ABUSIVE kind. they ONLY defend arguments that
homosexuality is natural born, and REFUSE any testimony by people
for whom it WASN'T natural, and they changed after healing from sexual abuse.

Same with arguments against Christian deliverance and exorcism healing
criminal illness and other diseases, mental or physical. The Left only bring up
FRAUDULENT cases and DISMISS any other reports, research, testimonies as "false propaganda"
depriving people of livesaving help due to political agenda.

They would rather people DIE of addiction, cancer and other diseases, criminal illness and abuse where innocent victims suffer,
rather than admit or spread any information about FREE spiritual healing and CURE that has saved lives.
Because it would prove Christians are right about something, and they don't want that.

 

[Luddly Neddite]

Here it is. Of course, the advise is taken totally out of context. Typical for Erick Erickson, who created this faux outrage.

ISSUU - Healthy Happy Hot by IPPF

​

According to your link, it shows that the HIV recipient can choose to or not disclose their disease.

Of course disclosing the information is the right (and only) thing to do. Encouraging these folks that it's a choice of if or when is careless and not safe. Not disclosing is putting the other partner at risk and should be considered a crime.

Not surprising that you're confused.

Also not surprising is that your thread title AND Joe's op/ed title are lies.

First, read the article. No where does PP say that AIDS victims should not tell their partner.

Second, it is your right not to tell.

Its not ethical but neither is it ethical to lie to further your agenda and that's what you and idiot Joe are doing.

 

[Luddly Neddite]

The statement never said you don't have to tell your partner , only that it is your right when to disclose. Many laws in countries, and in the US (the states), have laws about having to inform if you have HIV and you have sex..,

There should not be an "if" or "when" when it comes to disclosing the HIV disease. The when should be before engaging in sex.

HIV infected man charged with 21 counts of recklessly risking infection | FOX2now.com

There maybe laws, but how good are the laws to these victims he infected because he chose to keep his mouth shut and not disclose his condition?

Whaddaya know ... Yet another rw in favor of ending the First Amendment.

 

[Howey]

Here it is. Of course, the advise is taken totally out of context. Typical for Erick Erickson, who created this faux outrage.

ISSUU - Healthy Happy Hot by IPPF

According to your link, it shows that the HIV recipient can choose to or not disclose their disease.

Of course disclosing the information is the right (and only) thing to do. Encouraging these folks that it's a choice of if or when is careless and not safe. Not disclosing is putting the other partner at risk and should be considered a crime.

Umm...you may be an idiot, not very smart, and ignorant as hell but I'd suggest you delete that link to your PHOTOBUCKET account.

Pretty daughter.

 

[Howey]

Here it is. Of course, the advise is taken totally out of context. Typical for Erick Erickson, who created this faux outrage.

ISSUU - Healthy Happy Hot by IPPF

According to your link, it shows that the HIV recipient can choose to or not disclose their disease.

Of course disclosing the information is the right (and only) thing to do. Encouraging these folks that it's a choice of if or when is careless and not safe. Not disclosing is putting the other partner at risk and should be considered a crime.

I forgot. That, again, is the INTERNATIONAL Planned Parenthood Organization, not affiliated with ours. You forgot to address that.

Look, honey, since it's obvious you're not all that smart and all, perhaps you could realize that not every country has the same laws as ours and not all behavior is the same as ours?

Read the entire link I provided. There are, indeed, situations where it would not be safe for a young third world woman to disclose her HIV status.