Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Your constitutional right to committee assignments? Where's that in the constitution?How was his post 'racist'? What rules were violated? Sounds like emotionally fragile liberals are violating his rights.
The government is punishing free speech based on opinion, not law. That should concern anyone who values freedom. Clearly loony lefties need not apply.Your constitutional right to committee assignments? Where's that in the constitution?
You mean Congress is policing its members? And? The House voted last year to censure Rashida Tlaib over comment's she made regarding the conflict in Gaza and they've taken committee assignments away from Marjorie Taylor Greene.The government is punishing free speech based on opinion, not law. That should concern anyone who values freedom. Clearly loony lefties need not apply.
Sleazy liberals saying something is 'racist' without any legitimate cause is no reason to violate somebody's rights.You mean Congress is policing its members? And? The House voted last year to censure Rashida Tlaib over comment's she made regarding the conflict in Gaza and they've taken committee assignments away from Marjorie Taylor Greene.
What right was violated? Where in the Constitution do you have a right to committee assignments?Sleazy liberals saying something is 'racist' without any legitimate cause is no reason to violate somebody's rights.
Punitive action for exercising his Constitutional rights while being judged on opinion not law. You have no right not to be offended, yet everyone has the right to say 'offensive' things. Emotionally fragile liberals are simply lashing out like children. It's pathetic.What right was violated? Where in the Constitution do you have a right to committee assignments?
And you feel the same way about Republicans who censured Rashida Tlaib over comment's they found offense?Punitive action for exercising his Constitutional rights while being judged on opinion not law. You have no right not to be offended, yet everyone has the right to say 'offensive' things. Emotionally fragile liberals are simply lashing out like children. It's pathetic.
I don't disagree with this premise. Objective criticism, however fair and unbiased it is presented, any dissenters will throw out claims of racism or other ways to illogically refute or disparage the commentary. And that's the problem. Critical listening, thinking, and digesting of the commentary is no longer the correct response. Instead, overtly emotionally based, biased quips and illogical outrage of virtue signaling is becoming the acceptable norm.You have no absolute right to say what you want without blowback
Of course, I'm not a hypocrite. Hater Tlaib is free to say whatever she wants. I'm not emotionally fragile, so offensive speech and tweets really don't bother me. The world needs to toughen up and stop be perpetually offended by things best ignored.And you feel the same way about Republicans who censured Rashida Tlaib over comment's they found offense?
What sort of protection do you think your speech deserves? And is it not fair to hold people in positions accountable when their impartiality to the public is called into question? What about a cop who flies a Nazi flag in the front of his house? Are Jewish citizens supposed to trust his commitment to preserving their rights?Of course, I'm not a hypocrite. Hater Tlaib is free to say whatever she wants. I'm not emotionally fragile, so offensive speech and tweets really don't bother me. The world needs to toughen up and stop be perpetually offended by things best ignored.
If offensive speech isn't protected, no speech is. Nobody whines about unoffensive speech.
Oh, shut it. The GOP polices its members also. Just grow up.Sleazy liberals saying something is 'racist' without any legitimate cause is no reason to violate somebody's rights.
So you want to deny him his right to free speech?What about a cop who flies a Nazi flag in the front of his house?
Taking away his freedom of speech would entail forcing him to remove his nazi flag or jailing him for his nazi flag. I don't advocate for either one of those. What he has no right to is public trust. He can fly the flag he just can't do so and also be someone entrusted to preserve all citizens rights.So you want to deny him his right to free speech?
/——/ I’m so old I remember when liberals were the champions of free speech. The libs of the 1960s would be horrified.Your constitutional right to committee assignments? Where's that in the constitution?
You haven't even identified what violation of free speech you're talking about. You're free to say whatever you want./——/ I’m so old I remember when liberals were the champions of free speech. The libs of the 1960s would be horrified.
If it violates his employer's principles and he is told to stop it, the business can do so because they can regulate their employee's speech.So you want to deny him his right to free speech?
That would be you, not me.Then you don't understand what is free speech
Drudge believes free speech is absolute, but it is not.That would be you, not me.