Fraudulent Duke accuser & darling of the left and MSM charged with attempted murder

Neotrotsky

Council to Supreme Soviet
Dec 12, 2009
10,490
1,280
245
People's Republic
Fraudulent Duke accuser & darling of the left and MSM charged with attempted murder, arson



DURHAM, N.C. — Durham police late Wednesday arrested the woman who four years ago falsely accused three Duke University lacrosse players of raping her.
Crystal Mangum assaulted her boyfriend, set his clothes on fire in a bathtub and threatened to stab him, investigators said.

She was in the Durham County jail under a $1 million bondMangum, 33, has been appointed a public defender and is scheduled to appear in court on Feb. 22.

Police charged her with attempted first-degree murder, five counts of arson, assault and battery, communicating threats, three counts of misdemeanor child abuse, injury to personal property, identity theft and resisting a public officer.
 
She should have been in prison for the false accusations. But no,,, we can't do that can we. No one ever apologized to those innocent "white" boys either.


The MSM and the left sure got a good run out it

too bad for them it was not true

Truth is the worst enemy of left
 
Fraudulent Duke accuser & darling of the left and MSM charged with attempted murder, arson



DURHAM, N.C. — Durham police late Wednesday arrested the woman who four years ago falsely accused three Duke University lacrosse players of raping her.
Crystal Mangum assaulted her boyfriend, set his clothes on fire in a bathtub and threatened to stab him, investigators said.

She was in the Durham County jail under a $1 million bondMangum, 33, has been appointed a public defender and is scheduled to appear in court on Feb. 22.

Police charged her with attempted first-degree murder, five counts of arson, assault and battery, communicating threats, three counts of misdemeanor child abuse, injury to personal property, identity theft and resisting a public officer.


'Bout damned time that fucking drug addled, lying, stupid fucking hooker and all round c*nt sits her ass in jail for a LONG, LONG, LONG time.

She should have been there after destroying the lives of the Duke young men and their families for well more than a year.

The blog I have linked to below is a COMPREHENSIVE compendium of her racist exploitatation of these young men. The man who wrote this blog is a CUNY professor and Fulbright scholar who covered this case extensively and published a book about it.

Durham-in-Wonderland

Here are his comments on Mangum's arrest: Durham-in-Wonderland: Mangum Arrested (Updated)

KC Johnson said:
1) At this point, only a handful of people—chiefly the cranks at the “justice4nifong” website and the hacks who take seriously the site’s rantings—cling to the fiction that Mike Nifong was basically an ethical guy, a prosecutor who pursued the lacrosse case in good faith and had probable cause to do so. For this handful of true-believers and their followers, whitewashing Mangum’s character is critical—the image of her is generally of an “honors student” and “working mom” who had no incentive to lie. Such an approach, of course, requires ignoring Mangum’s 2002 arrest, her habit of leveling major, unsubstantiated accusations against people even before the case, and the fact that she showed up to her meeting with the special prosecutors under the influence of various prescription drugs. Despite that background, it’s going to be hard for even the truest of true believers to continue to hail Mangum’s good character if anything like the incident as reported is true.

2) Given that Mangum was charged with three counts of child endangerment, this incident should prompt some questions for North Carolina’s Department of Child Protective Services. Before the lacrosse case broke, it’s easy to understand how someone like Mangum (who at that point had two children) could have slipped through the cracks. But the case brought to light some disturbing patterns of conduct—Mangum’s 2002 arrest; her seemingly very serious mental health problems; her showing up for her special prosecutor’s interview under the influence of various drugs; and perhaps most troublingly her spring 2006 behavior before the lacrosse party, as attested by her closest associates (Yolanda Haynes, Jarriel Johnson, “Fats” Thomas),which included her using her “drivers” to look after her children and her frequently being away from home for the entire evening servicing her clients.

Did CPS look into the condition of Mangum’s children before she was formally charged with child endangerment? If so, what was the result of their investigation?

3) As of this writing (12.24pm), the New York Times (which saw fit to run dozens of articles and columns on the lacrosse case) hasn’t mentioned the arrest. The arrest puts the Times in a bind: even after the Attorney General declared her a false accuser, the Times refused to identify Mangum, apparently on the grounds that publicly identifying someone who made a false accusation of rape would deter real victims from coming forward. No Times reporter has ever used Mangum’s name in the newspaper. (One subsequent article from the AP that appeared in a Times brief did do so.) So will the Times cover the arrest, or continue to shield Mangum’s identity from its readers?

[At 5.15pm, the Times provided its answer: it picked up the AP wire story [AP has used Mangum's name since the innocence declaration] rather than have one its own reporters cover the story.]

4) Wendy Murphy might finally get her wish. In a wild column, the extremist commentator suggested that the unreleased section of the discovery file might show how the “seasoned prosecutor” Nifong had a case all along. Of course, the only unreleased section of the file was the roughly 1000 pages of Mangum’s mental health records, which Nifong possessed throughout the case and which Judge Smith gave to the defense, under seal, late in the case. (Murphy’s suggestion that this material would show Nifong’s good faith or that perhaps he had a case is, of course, preposterous—this material almost certainly would show that Mangum was an even more unreliable accuser than the public came to realize.)

If Mangum’s current case manages to make it to trial, an obvious line of defense would be mental impairment—which means that Mangum’s mental health history could come into evidence.

In my ever not so humble opinion, Crystal Gail Mangum deserves to be tortured mentally, physically and in every other way. Just the same way she tortured the Duke Men....simply because they were white.

Hey....52nd Street, here's one of your FINE, "SUPERIOR" black women. You stupid racist motherfucker.

What an ugly 'ho (completely). There is absolutely NOTHING redeeming about her. Not ONE redeeming quality. But, hell, I bet you, and Casper and Charlie Basshoile DEFENDED this ugly, worthless piece of shit when she was PERSECUTING the Duke men. Fucktard.

Crystal_Gail_Mangum_headshot_Mar06.jpg
 
Last edited:
Fraudulent Duke accuser & darling of the left and MSM charged with attempted murder, arson



DURHAM, N.C. — Durham police late Wednesday arrested the woman who four years ago falsely accused three Duke University lacrosse players of raping her.
Crystal Mangum assaulted her boyfriend, set his clothes on fire in a bathtub and threatened to stab him, investigators said.

She was in the Durham County jail under a $1 million bondMangum, 33, has been appointed a public defender and is scheduled to appear in court on Feb. 22.

Police charged her with attempted first-degree murder, five counts of arson, assault and battery, communicating threats, three counts of misdemeanor child abuse, injury to personal property, identity theft and resisting a public officer.


'Bout damned time that fucking drug addled, lying, stupid fucking hooker and all round c*nt sits her ass in jail for a LONG, LONG, LONG time.

She should have been there after destroying the lives of the Duke young men and their families for well more than a year.

The blog I have linked to below is a COMPREHENSIVE compendium of her racist exploitatation of these young men. The man who wrote this blog is a CUNY professor and Fulbright scholar who covered this case extensively and published a book about it.

Durham-in-Wonderland

Here are his comments on Mangum's arrest: Durham-in-Wonderland: Mangum Arrested (Updated)

KC Johnson said:
1) At this point, only a handful of people—chiefly the cranks at the “justice4nifong” website and the hacks who take seriously the site’s rantings—cling to the fiction that Mike Nifong was basically an ethical guy, a prosecutor who pursued the lacrosse case in good faith and had probable cause to do so. For this handful of true-believers and their followers, whitewashing Mangum’s character is critical—the image of her is generally of an “honors student” and “working mom” who had no incentive to lie. Such an approach, of course, requires ignoring Mangum’s 2002 arrest, her habit of leveling major, unsubstantiated accusations against people even before the case, and the fact that she showed up to her meeting with the special prosecutors under the influence of various prescription drugs. Despite that background, it’s going to be hard for even the truest of true believers to continue to hail Mangum’s good character if anything like the incident as reported is true.

2) Given that Mangum was charged with three counts of child endangerment, this incident should prompt some questions for North Carolina’s Department of Child Protective Services. Before the lacrosse case broke, it’s easy to understand how someone like Mangum (who at that point had two children) could have slipped through the cracks. But the case brought to light some disturbing patterns of conduct—Mangum’s 2002 arrest; her seemingly very serious mental health problems; her showing up for her special prosecutor’s interview under the influence of various drugs; and perhaps most troublingly her spring 2006 behavior before the lacrosse party, as attested by her closest associates (Yolanda Haynes, Jarriel Johnson, “Fats” Thomas),which included her using her “drivers” to look after her children and her frequently being away from home for the entire evening servicing her clients.

Did CPS look into the condition of Mangum’s children before she was formally charged with child endangerment? If so, what was the result of their investigation?

3) As of this writing (12.24pm), the New York Times (which saw fit to run dozens of articles and columns on the lacrosse case) hasn’t mentioned the arrest. The arrest puts the Times in a bind: even after the Attorney General declared her a false accuser, the Times refused to identify Mangum, apparently on the grounds that publicly identifying someone who made a false accusation of rape would deter real victims from coming forward. No Times reporter has ever used Mangum’s name in the newspaper. (One subsequent article from the AP that appeared in a Times brief did do so.) So will the Times cover the arrest, or continue to shield Mangum’s identity from its readers?

[At 5.15pm, the Times provided its answer: it picked up the AP wire story [AP has used Mangum's name since the innocence declaration] rather than have one its own reporters cover the story.]

4) Wendy Murphy might finally get her wish. In a wild column, the extremist commentator suggested that the unreleased section of the discovery file might show how the “seasoned prosecutor” Nifong had a case all along. Of course, the only unreleased section of the file was the roughly 1000 pages of Mangum’s mental health records, which Nifong possessed throughout the case and which Judge Smith gave to the defense, under seal, late in the case. (Murphy’s suggestion that this material would show Nifong’s good faith or that perhaps he had a case is, of course, preposterous—this material almost certainly would show that Mangum was an even more unreliable accuser than the public came to realize.)

If Mangum’s current case manages to make it to trial, an obvious line of defense would be mental impairment—which means that Mangum’s mental health history could come into evidence.

In my ever not so humble opinion, Crystal Gail Mangum deserves to be tortured mentally, physically and in every other way. Just the same way she tortured the Duke Men....simply because they were white.

Hey....52nd Street, here's one of your FINE, "SUPERIOR" black women. You stupid racist motherfucker.

What an ugly 'ho (completely). There is absolutely NOTHING redeeming about her. Not ONE redeeming quality. But, hell, I bet you, and Casper and Charlie Basshoile DEFENDED this ugly, worthless piece of shit when she was PERSECUTING the Duke men. Fucktard.

Crystal_Gail_Mangum_headshot_Mar06.jpg

Lord Yahshua. Here we go.:cuckoo:

So when are you and 52ndstreet going to "jump the broom" so to speak?

One thing I will say is those are very nice contacts she has on.:lol:
 
Fraudulent Duke accuser & darling of the left and MSM charged with attempted murder, arson



DURHAM, N.C. — Durham police late Wednesday arrested the woman who four years ago falsely accused three Duke University lacrosse players of raping her.
Crystal Mangum assaulted her boyfriend, set his clothes on fire in a bathtub and threatened to stab him, investigators said.

She was in the Durham County jail under a $1 million bondMangum, 33, has been appointed a public defender and is scheduled to appear in court on Feb. 22.

Police charged her with attempted first-degree murder, five counts of arson, assault and battery, communicating threats, three counts of misdemeanor child abuse, injury to personal property, identity theft and resisting a public officer.


'Bout damned time that fucking drug addled, lying, stupid fucking hooker and all round c*nt sits her ass in jail for a LONG, LONG, LONG time.

She should have been there after destroying the lives of the Duke young men and their families for well more than a year.

The blog I have linked to below is a COMPREHENSIVE compendium of her racist exploitatation of these young men. The man who wrote this blog is a CUNY professor and Fulbright scholar who covered this case extensively and published a book about it.

Durham-in-Wonderland

Here are his comments on Mangum's arrest: Durham-in-Wonderland: Mangum Arrested (Updated)

KC Johnson said:
1) At this point, only a handful of people—chiefly the cranks at the “justice4nifong” website and the hacks who take seriously the site’s rantings—cling to the fiction that Mike Nifong was basically an ethical guy, a prosecutor who pursued the lacrosse case in good faith and had probable cause to do so. For this handful of true-believers and their followers, whitewashing Mangum’s character is critical—the image of her is generally of an “honors student” and “working mom” who had no incentive to lie. Such an approach, of course, requires ignoring Mangum’s 2002 arrest, her habit of leveling major, unsubstantiated accusations against people even before the case, and the fact that she showed up to her meeting with the special prosecutors under the influence of various prescription drugs. Despite that background, it’s going to be hard for even the truest of true believers to continue to hail Mangum’s good character if anything like the incident as reported is true.

2) Given that Mangum was charged with three counts of child endangerment, this incident should prompt some questions for North Carolina’s Department of Child Protective Services. Before the lacrosse case broke, it’s easy to understand how someone like Mangum (who at that point had two children) could have slipped through the cracks. But the case brought to light some disturbing patterns of conduct—Mangum’s 2002 arrest; her seemingly very serious mental health problems; her showing up for her special prosecutor’s interview under the influence of various drugs; and perhaps most troublingly her spring 2006 behavior before the lacrosse party, as attested by her closest associates (Yolanda Haynes, Jarriel Johnson, “Fats” Thomas),which included her using her “drivers” to look after her children and her frequently being away from home for the entire evening servicing her clients.

Did CPS look into the condition of Mangum’s children before she was formally charged with child endangerment? If so, what was the result of their investigation?

3) As of this writing (12.24pm), the New York Times (which saw fit to run dozens of articles and columns on the lacrosse case) hasn’t mentioned the arrest. The arrest puts the Times in a bind: even after the Attorney General declared her a false accuser, the Times refused to identify Mangum, apparently on the grounds that publicly identifying someone who made a false accusation of rape would deter real victims from coming forward. No Times reporter has ever used Mangum’s name in the newspaper. (One subsequent article from the AP that appeared in a Times brief did do so.) So will the Times cover the arrest, or continue to shield Mangum’s identity from its readers?

[At 5.15pm, the Times provided its answer: it picked up the AP wire story [AP has used Mangum's name since the innocence declaration] rather than have one its own reporters cover the story.]

4) Wendy Murphy might finally get her wish. In a wild column, the extremist commentator suggested that the unreleased section of the discovery file might show how the “seasoned prosecutor” Nifong had a case all along. Of course, the only unreleased section of the file was the roughly 1000 pages of Mangum’s mental health records, which Nifong possessed throughout the case and which Judge Smith gave to the defense, under seal, late in the case. (Murphy’s suggestion that this material would show Nifong’s good faith or that perhaps he had a case is, of course, preposterous—this material almost certainly would show that Mangum was an even more unreliable accuser than the public came to realize.)

If Mangum’s current case manages to make it to trial, an obvious line of defense would be mental impairment—which means that Mangum’s mental health history could come into evidence.

In my ever not so humble opinion, Crystal Gail Mangum deserves to be tortured mentally, physically and in every other way. Just the same way she tortured the Duke Men....simply because they were white.

Hey....52nd Street, here's one of your FINE, "SUPERIOR" black women. You stupid racist motherfucker.

What an ugly 'ho (completely). There is absolutely NOTHING redeeming about her. Not ONE redeeming quality. But, hell, I bet you, and Casper and Charlie Basshoile DEFENDED this ugly, worthless piece of shit when she was PERSECUTING the Duke men. Fucktard.

Crystal_Gail_Mangum_headshot_Mar06.jpg

Lord Yahshua. Here we go.:cuckoo:

So when are you and 52ndstreet going to "jump the broom" so to speak?

One thing I will say is those are very nice contacts she has on.:lol:

Contacts and BLONDE weave. Yeah, she's SO proud to be black and superior. :lol: :rofl:





















Oh, and......I don't jump brooms. And certainly not with an asshole like 52nd. Mmmmmkay?
 
Darling of the left? You got proof of that?

You'll have to wait for Neo to get his/her head out of their ass to answer that.


But I want to be some much like you (hiding from the truth is a standard of the left since truth is their worst enemy)
:eusa_angel:

You are right; the left and the MSM did not take her side at all and jump to judgment

In fact, you can tell my the same "equitable" treatment of
The Killings of Channon Christian and Chris Newsom

to see that is true
:eusa_whistle:
 

Forum List

Back
Top