Fox's Kilmeade Suggests Constitutional Rights Should Not Apply To All American Citize

[hazlnut]

Fox's Kilmeade Suggests Constitutional Rights Should Not Apply To All American Citizens

Spread ass cheeks, begin to speak...

KILMEADE: What do we do? We sit there -- F.B.I. Interrogators sit down with him for a week or two until they feel as though they got accurate information.

JOHNSON: Do you believe in indefinite detention of Americans? Because I don't. I don't believe we should detain -- No matter how loathsome, disgusting, vile, contemptible.

KILMEADE: Two different issues.

JOHNSON: No, it's the same issue, an American issue. No, no, no. Either we believe in the Constitution or we don't believe in the Constitution.

KILMEADE: Not everyone is worthy of the constitutional rights that we have.

We're not worthy, we're not worthy...


Shouldn't we apply that logic to CEO's who steal/misuse tax dollars? Why allow them to lawyer-up? Why not just torture him?

 

[Truthmatters]

Im telling you the right is begining to say what they really believe.


Its a good thing for this country that they dont hide these types of thoughts anymore.

 

[Truthmatters]

what should dont to the CEO who blew up a little town in Texas out of neglect

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

TM why aren't you reminding him of the rules? You trashed the thread about abortion crying about rules. Here we have a thread about a media personality very similar to the abortion thread and not a peep from you about rules violations.

And you wonder why you have 0 credibility. .... hack

 

[TemplarKormac]

This thread should be moved to the appropriate forum. In before the move.

 

[Katzndogz]

I amost took it seriously, but it comes from media matters which is similar to the Onion.

 

[TemplarKormac]

Fox's Kilmeade Suggests Constitutional Rights Should Not Apply To All American Citizens

Spread ass cheeks, begin to speak...

KILMEADE: What do we do? We sit there -- F.B.I. Interrogators sit down with him for a week or two until they feel as though they got accurate information.

JOHNSON: Do you believe in indefinite detention of Americans? Because I don't. I don't believe we should detain -- No matter how loathsome, disgusting, vile, contemptible.

KILMEADE: Two different issues.

JOHNSON: No, it's the same issue, an American issue. No, no, no. Either we believe in the Constitution or we don't believe in the Constitution.

KILMEADE: Not everyone is worthy of the constitutional rights that we have.

We're not worthy, we're not worthy...


Shouldn't we apply that logic to CEO's who steal/misuse tax dollars? Why allow them to lawyer-up? Why not just torture him?

I know, I know! Ooooh me me me me me, pick ME!

Constitutional rights should not apply to terrorists and illegal immigrants! If this could happen, that'd be great.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Fox's Kilmeade Suggests Constitutional Rights Should Not Apply To All American Citizens

Spread ass cheeks, begin to speak...

KILMEADE: What do we do? We sit there -- F.B.I. Interrogators sit down with him for a week or two until they feel as though they got accurate information.

JOHNSON: Do you believe in indefinite detention of Americans? Because I don't. I don't believe we should detain -- No matter how loathsome, disgusting, vile, contemptible.

KILMEADE: Two different issues.

JOHNSON: No, it's the same issue, an American issue. No, no, no. Either we believe in the Constitution or we don't believe in the Constitution.

KILMEADE: Not everyone is worthy of the constitutional rights that we have.

We're not worthy, we're not worthy...


Shouldn't we apply that logic to CEO's who steal/misuse tax dollars? Why allow them to lawyer-up? Why not just torture him?

What the heck is it with folks who want to curtail our freedoms????

I'm with Betty and Moronica, above, who want 'em out!!!

This guy?
1. "OBAMA PROPOSES AMENDMENT TO RESTRICT POLITICAL SPEECH IN REDDIT APPEARANCE
Obama also called on Congress to pass the Disclose Act, which would require any organization that spends more than $10,000 on election-related activities to disclose all of its donors who have contributed more than $10,000.
Obama made these comments, which would restrict speech, on the Internet, which has long been a free speech safe haven.?
Obama Proposes Amendment to Restrict Political Speech in Reddit Appearance


...and this one, fer sure!


2. ""In her 1993 article "Regulation of Hate Speech and Pornography After R.A.V," for the University of Chicago Law Review, Kagan writes:

"I take it as a given that we live in a society marred by racial and gender inequality, that certain forms of speech perpetuate and promote this inequality, and that the uncoerced disappearance of such speech would be cause for great elation."

In a 1996 paper, "Private Speech, Public Purpose: The Role of Governmental Motive in First Amendment Doctrine," Kagan argued it may be proper to suppress speech because it is offensive to society or to the government.
That paper asserted First Amendment doctrine is comprised of "motives and ... actions infested with them" and she goes so far as to claim that "First Amendment law is best understood and most readily explained as a kind of motive-hunting."
WyBlog -- Elena Kagan's America: some speech can be "disappeared"
Elena Kagan Radical anti-gun nut? | The Daley Gator

 

[Yurt]

did the american who obama killed with a drone have constitutional rights?

 

[OriginalShroom]

Everyone who has argued that the police didn't need warrants for the Boston search or that they agreed that they didn't need to read the suspect his Miranda rights agrees with Kilmeade..

Guess what, there were more Liberals agreeing with those positions than Conservatives.

 

[theHawk]

Fox's Kilmeade Suggests Constitutional Rights Should Not Apply To All American Citizens

Spread ass cheeks, begin to speak...

KILMEADE: What do we do? We sit there -- F.B.I. Interrogators sit down with him for a week or two until they feel as though they got accurate information.

JOHNSON: Do you believe in indefinite detention of Americans? Because I don't. I don't believe we should detain -- No matter how loathsome, disgusting, vile, contemptible.

KILMEADE: Two different issues.

JOHNSON: No, it's the same issue, an American issue. No, no, no. Either we believe in the Constitution or we don't believe in the Constitution.

KILMEADE: Not everyone is worthy of the constitutional rights that we have.

We're not worthy, we're not worthy...


Shouldn't we apply that logic to CEO's who steal/misuse tax dollars? Why allow them to lawyer-up? Why not just torture him?

Some people aren't worthy of our Constitutional Rights, but they have them nonetheless.

Just like how many of us probably feel you're not worthy to post your idiotic rants, but it doesn't mean we'll actually take away your right to.

 

[Freewill]

Fox's Kilmeade Suggests Constitutional Rights Should Not Apply To All American Citizens

Spread ass cheeks, begin to speak...

KILMEADE: What do we do? We sit there -- F.B.I. Interrogators sit down with him for a week or two until they feel as though they got accurate information.

JOHNSON: Do you believe in indefinite detention of Americans? Because I don't. I don't believe we should detain -- No matter how loathsome, disgusting, vile, contemptible.

KILMEADE: Two different issues.

JOHNSON: No, it's the same issue, an American issue. No, no, no. Either we believe in the Constitution or we don't believe in the Constitution.

KILMEADE: Not everyone is worthy of the constitutional rights that we have.

We're not worthy, we're not worthy...


Shouldn't we apply that logic to CEO's who steal/misuse tax dollars? Why allow them to lawyer-up? Why not just torture him?

THAT is exactly what the left wing, and others, have been telling me for quite some time. I was told today that if the AMERICAN wasn't in this country the person could care less what happens to him, EVEN if we kill him for no damn reason. It is disgusting that we allow the killing of a 16 year old American to go by without so much as a peep. So don't be all leftist high and mighty it is YOUR side ignoring what they would have a stroke over if it were Bush.

 

[martybegan]

Everyone who has argued that the police didn't need warrants for the Boston search or that they agreed that they didn't need to read the suspect his Miranda rights agrees with Kilmeade..

Guess what, there were more Liberals agreeing with those positions than Conservatives.

Progressives also believe only agents of the government really "need" 2nd amendment rights as well.

 

[whitehall]

The left must be desperate if they use this (tax exempt) Media Matters "scoop" as an issue.

 

[Mustang]

Im telling you the right is begining to say what they really believe.


Its a good thing for this country that they dont hide these types of thoughts anymore.

Conservatives have ALWAYS believed that Constitutional rights are sacrosanct. Just not for everybody. At least not to the same degree.

If yer a God fearin' white protestant? Well, boy howdy, God made the South just fer you and yourn, doncha know.

Anybody else? Well, it depends. Which invariably leads to the question of state's rights.

 

[OriginalShroom]

Im telling you the right is begining to say what they really believe.


Its a good thing for this country that they dont hide these types of thoughts anymore.

Conservatives have ALWAYS believed that Constitutional rights are sacrosanct. Just not for everybody. At least not to the same degree.

If yer a God fearin' white protestant? Well, boy howdy, God made the South just fer you and yourn, doncha know.

Anybody else? Well, it depends. Which invariably leads to the question of state's rights.

Excuse me, you liar you...

But this Conservative and others have been arguing that the police violated the 4th Amendment in their house to house search and the 48 hour delay in giving the suspect his Miranda warnings violated the Constitution and the law.

It was the Liberals who argued for them.

 

[Mr. Peepers]

what should dont to the CEO who blew up a little town in Texas out of neglect

And the banksters that blew up the economies of... well, pretty much the whole world. Iceland has their ducks in a row.

Executives at collapsed Iceland bank jailed for fraud | Reuters

 

[Mustang]

Im telling you the right is begining to say what they really believe.


Its a good thing for this country that they dont hide these types of thoughts anymore.

Conservatives have ALWAYS believed that Constitutional rights are sacrosanct. Just not for everybody. At least not to the same degree.

If yer a God fearin' white protestant? Well, boy howdy, God made the South just fer you and yourn, doncha know.

Anybody else? Well, it depends. Which invariably leads to the question of state's rights.

Excuse me, you liar you...

But this Conservative and others have been arguing that the police violated the 4th Amendment in their house to house search and the 48 hour delay in giving the suspect his Miranda warnings violated the Constitution and the law.

It was the Liberals who argued for them.

Well, I should qualify my statement by saying that it doesn't apply to ALL conservatives. But as a general rule, it's true -- especially in the South.

 

[OriginalShroom]

Conservatives have ALWAYS believed that Constitutional rights are sacrosanct. Just not for everybody. At least not to the same degree.

If yer a God fearin' white protestant? Well, boy howdy, God made the South just fer you and yourn, doncha know.

Anybody else? Well, it depends. Which invariably leads to the question of state's rights.

Excuse me, you liar you...

But this Conservative and others have been arguing that the police violated the 4th Amendment in their house to house search and the 48 hour delay in giving the suspect his Miranda warnings violated the Constitution and the law.

It was the Liberals who argued for them.

Well, I should qualify my statement by saying that it doesn't apply to ALL conservatives. But as a general rule, it's true -- especially in the South.

You are really striking out here..

I live south of the Mason-Dixon. And it is still the Democrats and Liberals defending the Boston Police violating the 4th Amendment rights of the homeowners.

 

[Mustang]

Excuse me, you liar you...

But this Conservative and others have been arguing that the police violated the 4th Amendment in their house to house search and the 48 hour delay in giving the suspect his Miranda warnings violated the Constitution and the law.

It was the Liberals who argued for them.

Well, I should qualify my statement by saying that it doesn't apply to ALL conservatives. But as a general rule, it's true -- especially in the South.

You are really striking out here..

I live south of the Mason-Dixon. And it is still the Democrats and Liberals defending the Boston Police violating the 4th Amendment rights of the homeowners.

I don't know who YOU are talking to. I personally think that the gov't didn't really have a justification for shutting down the city even if one could argue that they had the authority to do so under certain circumstances.

At any rate, Tsarneav IS an American citizen. He is entitled to his rights under the Constitution regardless of what RW radio uber patriots or congressmen who patronize the public with their rabid rhetoric say about it.