and how were McCain and Toomey in a scandal?Um ... turn your brain on please, you are embarrassing right now. There are many non-Democrats and non-Republicans who wind up with the R or D next to their names just because they are the most common. Listen instead to what they say, now if they kept saying he was a Democrat then I would believe you, but just a typo on some text on a screen ... no I have no reason to see it as otherwise. Many typos are common. In our area Fox news is biased toward Democrats, ABC is biased toward Republicans ...
Um, Fox News is a national cable network... there is the SAME right wing bias EVERYWHERE... you are confusing local affiliates with networks...
*yawn* proves nothing more than they need a new editor to catch those errors.
Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
More options
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
FOX News at it again.
- Thread starter Ravi
- Start date
No one threw a whiny fit about it ... just this one ...
So you expect me to believe you, a proven liar, on your word?
Sorry, but no.
Real life cannot be proven false unless you live in it ...
Too bad you don't cite anything approximating real life.
Again, where is the outrage from the right?
I think it's wrong but no where near where the CNN reporter went on April 15Th when dealing with the Tea Parties. Or where MSNBC went that day. I personally think all of them are flawed in major ways. One of the reasons I go to more than one or two news sources to find out what happened.
The tea parties were ludicrousely stupid protests that were championed by fox news. They shouldn't even have been reported, really.
uh, wrong again, moronAgain, where is the outrage from the right?
I think it's wrong but no where near where the CNN reporter went on April 15Th when dealing with the Tea Parties. Or where MSNBC went that day. I personally think all of them are flawed in major ways. One of the reasons I go to more than one or two news sources to find out what happened.
The tea parties were ludicrousely stupid protests that were championed by fox news. They shouldn't even have been reported, really.
Fox News was dragged reluctantly to it
KittenKoder
Senior Member
So you expect me to believe you, a proven liar, on your word?
Sorry, but no.
Real life cannot be proven false unless you live in it ...
Too bad you don't cite anything approximating real life.
Oh ... so somehow you lived my life as well ... that's just creepy.
uh, wrong again, moronI think it's wrong but no where near where the CNN reporter went on April 15Th when dealing with the Tea Parties. Or where MSNBC went that day. I personally think all of them are flawed in major ways. One of the reasons I go to more than one or two news sources to find out what happened.
The tea parties were ludicrousely stupid protests that were championed by fox news. They shouldn't even have been reported, really.
Fox News was dragged reluctantly to it
Hosting the party: Fox aired at least 20 segments, 73 promos on "tea party" protests -- in just 8 days | Media Matters for America
Share Print Email
Hosting the party: Fox aired at least 20 segments, 73 promos on "tea party" protests -- in just 8 days
Doesn't sound reluctant to me. It sound reluctant to you?
Angel Heart
Conservative Hippie
Um, Fox News is a national cable network... there is the SAME right wing bias EVERYWHERE... you are confusing local affiliates with networks...
*yawn* proves nothing more than they need a new editor to catch those errors.
Exactly... I bet if these anally retentive members of ours where to pay attention to CNN and MSNBC as closely as they do Fox, they would find they make the same mistakes. They like pointing out the speck in Fox's eye while ignoring the planks in other news groups eyes.
Real life cannot be proven false unless you live in it ...
Too bad you don't cite anything approximating real life.
Oh ... so somehow you lived my life as well ... that's just creepy.
Wtf are you babbling about now?
KittenKoder
Senior Member
uh, wrong again, moronThe tea parties were ludicrousely stupid protests that were championed by fox news. They shouldn't even have been reported, really.
Fox News was dragged reluctantly to it
Hosting the party: Fox aired at least 20 segments, 73 promos on "tea party" protests -- in just 8 days | Media Matters for America
Share Print Email
Hosting the party: Fox aired at least 20 segments, 73 promos on "tea party" protests -- in just 8 days
Doesn't sound reluctant to me. It sound reluctant to you?
"Promos" are ads ... paid for by others and aired to cover the costs of operating for the station, they sell time spaces and do not choose what to air in those spaces most times, they do deny some, but Fox in our state showed more Obama positive coverage than any other station, I know because they still do, during my shows ... and it annoys the hell out of me. "This" is the only other station that comes close to Fox's support of Obama.
Um, Fox News is a national cable network... there is the SAME right wing bias EVERYWHERE... you are confusing local affiliates with networks...
*yawn* proves nothing more than they need a new editor to catch those errors.
Exactly... I bet if these anally retentive members of ours where to pay attention to CNN and MSNBC as closely as they do Fox, they would find they make the same mistakes. They like pointing out the speck in Fox's eye while ignoring the planks in other news groups eyes.
I know...its not like there are any rightwing organizations pointing out errors in the media....
uh, wrong again, moron
Fox News was dragged reluctantly to it
Hosting the party: Fox aired at least 20 segments, 73 promos on "tea party" protests -- in just 8 days | Media Matters for America
Share Print Email
Hosting the party: Fox aired at least 20 segments, 73 promos on "tea party" protests -- in just 8 days
Doesn't sound reluctant to me. It sound reluctant to you?
"Promos" are ads ... paid for by others and aired to cover the costs of operating for the station, they sell time spaces and do not choose what to air in those spaces most times, they do deny some, but Fox in our state showed more Obama positive coverage than any other station, I know because they still do, during my shows ... and it annoys the hell out of me. "This" is the only other station that comes close to Fox's support of Obama.
Oh, I'm sorry. You fail at reading comprehension. Promos included in-show promos that were NOT advertisements.
Besides the fact that where did you get the idea that others are paying for the promos?
KittenKoder
Senior Member
Hosting the party: Fox aired at least 20 segments, 73 promos on "tea party" protests -- in just 8 days | Media Matters for America
Share Print Email
Hosting the party: Fox aired at least 20 segments, 73 promos on "tea party" protests -- in just 8 days
Doesn't sound reluctant to me. It sound reluctant to you?
"Promos" are ads ... paid for by others and aired to cover the costs of operating for the station, they sell time spaces and do not choose what to air in those spaces most times, they do deny some, but Fox in our state showed more Obama positive coverage than any other station, I know because they still do, during my shows ... and it annoys the hell out of me. "This" is the only other station that comes close to Fox's support of Obama.
Oh, I'm sorry. You fail at reading comprehension. Promos included in-show promos that were NOT advertisements.
Besides the fact that where did you get the idea that others are paying for the promos?
Where do you get the idea that they are not?
When you work in the field or at least actually understand how media works, try this again ... you are clearly unarmed and just looking for something to whine about right now. If this was as big a deal as you think it is, then the Republicans would be all upset about one of their own being "sullied" with the big "D" ....
"Promos" are ads ... paid for by others and aired to cover the costs of operating for the station, they sell time spaces and do not choose what to air in those spaces most times, they do deny some, but Fox in our state showed more Obama positive coverage than any other station, I know because they still do, during my shows ... and it annoys the hell out of me. "This" is the only other station that comes close to Fox's support of Obama.
Oh, I'm sorry. You fail at reading comprehension. Promos included in-show promos that were NOT advertisements.
Besides the fact that where did you get the idea that others are paying for the promos?
Where do you get the idea that they are not?
When you work in the field or at least actually understand how media works, try this again ... you are clearly unarmed and just looking for something to whine about right now. If this was as big a deal as you think it is, then the Republicans would be all upset about one of their own being "sullied" with the big "D" ....
Oh well, if you said it, it must be true. I mean perish forbid I trust Wikipedia where there are actually standards, but I should trust you...a proven liar on the internet.
KittenKoder
Senior Member
Oh, I'm sorry. You fail at reading comprehension. Promos included in-show promos that were NOT advertisements.
Besides the fact that where did you get the idea that others are paying for the promos?
Where do you get the idea that they are not?
When you work in the field or at least actually understand how media works, try this again ... you are clearly unarmed and just looking for something to whine about right now. If this was as big a deal as you think it is, then the Republicans would be all upset about one of their own being "sullied" with the big "D" ....
Oh well, if you said it, it must be true. I mean perish forbid I trust Wikipedia where there are actually standards, but I should trust you...a proven liar on the internet.
LOL ... yeah, "standards" imposed by the private owners of Wicrapedia ... when they allow a page that states that Anime is "child porn" ... that's some good standards. You are denser than I originally thought at this rate and failed to address the last part of my post, so here again:
If this was as big a deal as you think it is, then the Republicans would be all upset about one of their own being "sullied" with the big "D" ....
nik is such a foolWhere do you get the idea that they are not?
When you work in the field or at least actually understand how media works, try this again ... you are clearly unarmed and just looking for something to whine about right now. If this was as big a deal as you think it is, then the Republicans would be all upset about one of their own being "sullied" with the big "D" ....
Oh well, if you said it, it must be true. I mean perish forbid I trust Wikipedia where there are actually standards, but I should trust you...a proven liar on the internet.
LOL ... yeah, "standards" imposed by the private owners of Wicrapedia ... when they allow a page that states that Anime is "child porn" ... that's some good standards. You are denser than I originally thought at this rate and failed to address the last part of my post, so here again:
If this was as big a deal as you think it is, then the Republicans would be all upset about one of their own being "sullied" with the big "D" ....
Where do you get the idea that they are not?
When you work in the field or at least actually understand how media works, try this again ... you are clearly unarmed and just looking for something to whine about right now. If this was as big a deal as you think it is, then the Republicans would be all upset about one of their own being "sullied" with the big "D" ....
Oh well, if you said it, it must be true. I mean perish forbid I trust Wikipedia where there are actually standards, but I should trust you...a proven liar on the internet.
LOL ... yeah, "standards" imposed by the private owners of Wicrapedia ... when they allow a page that states that Anime is "child porn" ... that's some good standards. You are denser than I originally thought at this rate and failed to address the last part of my post, so here again:
If this was as big a deal as you think it is, then the Republicans would be all upset about one of their own being "sullied" with the big "D" ....
Yeah...Republicans are going to freak out that one of their own who just had an affair is called a Democrat....
Brilliant reasoning skills there.
nik is such a foolOh well, if you said it, it must be true. I mean perish forbid I trust Wikipedia where there are actually standards, but I should trust you...a proven liar on the internet.
LOL ... yeah, "standards" imposed by the private owners of Wicrapedia ... when they allow a page that states that Anime is "child porn" ... that's some good standards. You are denser than I originally thought at this rate and failed to address the last part of my post, so here again:
If this was as big a deal as you think it is, then the Republicans would be all upset about one of their own being "sullied" with the big "D" ....
Back into your crate, poodle.
KittenKoder
Senior Member
Oh well, if you said it, it must be true. I mean perish forbid I trust Wikipedia where there are actually standards, but I should trust you...a proven liar on the internet.
LOL ... yeah, "standards" imposed by the private owners of Wicrapedia ... when they allow a page that states that Anime is "child porn" ... that's some good standards. You are denser than I originally thought at this rate and failed to address the last part of my post, so here again:
If this was as big a deal as you think it is, then the Republicans would be all upset about one of their own being "sullied" with the big "D" ....
Yeah...Republicans are going to freak out that one of their own who just had an affair is called a Democrat....
Brilliant reasoning skills there.
Refresh my memory again, when was the last time they denied a Republican involved in a sex scandal was a Republican?
McCain and Toomey?Oh well, if you said it, it must be true. I mean perish forbid I trust Wikipedia where there are actually standards, but I should trust you...a proven liar on the internet.
LOL ... yeah, "standards" imposed by the private owners of Wicrapedia ... when they allow a page that states that Anime is "child porn" ... that's some good standards. You are denser than I originally thought at this rate and failed to address the last part of my post, so here again:
If this was as big a deal as you think it is, then the Republicans would be all upset about one of their own being "sullied" with the big "D" ....
Yeah...Republicans are going to freak out that one of their own who just had an affair is called a Democrat....
Brilliant reasoning skills there.
projecting againnik is such a foolLOL ... yeah, "standards" imposed by the private owners of Wicrapedia ... when they allow a page that states that Anime is "child porn" ... that's some good standards. You are denser than I originally thought at this rate and failed to address the last part of my post, so here again:
If this was as big a deal as you think it is, then the Republicans would be all upset about one of their own being "sullied" with the big "D" ....
Back into your crate, poodle.
Similar threads
- Replies
- 10
- Views
- 179
- Replies
- 224
- Views
- 2K
Latest Discussions
- Replies
- 32
- Views
- 143
- Replies
- 71
- Views
- 563
- Replies
- 19
- Views
- 155
Forum List
-
-
-
-
-
Political Satire 8087
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ObamaCare 781
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Member Usernotes 471
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-