Four Democrats advocate gun control legislation following Colorado shooting

That is like saying you told a right winger to somehow magically become intellegent, it doesn't happen.

Instead of "well, I don't like him, he's a liberal, but we've told him how to think and he promised to abide by it, so that's good enough for me" is ridiculous. Try thinking for yourself and vote for those that actually support your views.
If gun rights are a strong issue for you, Obama has been very conservative with them, as has Johnson. Being an obedient sheep to the GOP is easy, thinking for yourself takes talent :up:

You don't need to worry about it, but I am thinking for myself, and given the choice between Obama and Romney it's not even close.

Glad to hear you are voting for Obama :up:

Your mind is wandering.....and it doesn't have far to go.
 
That is like saying you told a right winger to somehow magically become intellegent, it doesn't happen.

Instead of "well, I don't like him, he's a liberal, but we've told him how to think and he promised to abide by it, so that's good enough for me" is ridiculous. Try thinking for yourself and vote for those that actually support your views.
If gun rights are a strong issue for you, Obama has been very conservative with them, as has Johnson. Being an obedient sheep to the GOP is easy, thinking for yourself takes talent :up:

You don't need to worry about it, but I am thinking for myself, and given the choice between Obama and Romney it's not even close.

Glad to hear you are voting for Obama :up:


I think he meant a good choice, Obama is only good if you like to suck pole.
 
Anyime there's any attempt to restrict gun rights, it's always coming from the Democrat Party.

Keep talking Dems ! :clap2:

Communists hate private gun ownership.

Whew...good thing we aren't Communists then. I love my guns...of course, I don't have military style weapons whose only purpose is to kill as many people as possible in the least amount of time.

All of our fundamental rights have "riders" on them. Why is this right so "untouchable" and can't have any restrictions on it?

The Second Amendment isn't a novelty.... It has a reason and it's reason is to arm the people with the intent of defending themselves from a tyrannical government..

People should have access to guns that can turn tyrants into Swiss Cheese.... That's the fucking point....

What good is a snubnose .38 against a fucking AR-15???

In theory the people should have access to the same weaponry as the armed forces...
 
Communists hate private gun ownership.

Whew...good thing we aren't Communists then. I love my guns...of course, I don't have military style weapons whose only purpose is to kill as many people as possible in the least amount of time.

All of our fundamental rights have "riders" on them. Why is this right so "untouchable" and can't have any restrictions on it?

The Second Amendment isn't a novelty.... It has a reason and it's reason is to arm the people with the intent of defending themselves from a tyrannical government..

People should have access to guns that can turn tyrants into Swiss Cheese.... That's the fucking point....

What good is a snubnose .38 against a fucking AR-15???

In theory the people should have access to the same weaponry as the armed forces...

Sure. Citizens should have missile launchers, tanks, black hawks. In reality, you're retarded.
 
Last edited:
Communists hate private gun ownership.

Whew...good thing we aren't Communists then. I love my guns...of course, I don't have military style weapons whose only purpose is to kill as many people as possible in the least amount of time.

All of our fundamental rights have "riders" on them. Why is this right so "untouchable" and can't have any restrictions on it?

The Second Amendment isn't a novelty.... It has a reason and it's reason is to arm the people with the intent of defending themselves from a tyrannical government.
That is a astute logical post.
 
Then you haven't been paying attention.



Then you'll agree that Senator Feinstein, who I bet you have voted for, is incredibly ludicrous.

Yes it is ludicrous but that is why you keep posting the idea of ONE Dem.
H.R.2038
Latest Title: Assault Weapons Ban and Law Enforcement Protection Act of 2003
Sponsor: Rep McCarthy, Carolyn [NY-4] (introduced 5/8/2003) Cosponsors (111)

Rep Abercrombie, Neil [HI-1] - 6/16/2003
Rep Acevedo-Vila, Anibal [PR] - 6/14/2004
Rep Ackerman, Gary L. [NY-5] - 5/8/2003
Rep Andrews, Robert E. [NJ-1] - 5/8/2003
Rep Becerra, Xavier [CA-31] - 7/24/2003
Rep Berman, Howard L. [CA-28] - 7/24/2003
Rep Bishop, Timothy H. [NY-1] - 5/8/2003
Rep Blumenauer, Earl [OR-3] - 5/8/2003
Rep Brady, Robert A. [PA-1] - 5/8/2003
Rep Brown, Corrine [FL-3] - 5/8/2003
Rep Capps, Lois [CA-23] - 5/19/2003
Rep Capuano, Michael E. [MA-8] - 5/8/2003
Rep Cardin, Benjamin L. [MD-3] - 6/3/2003
Rep Carson, Julia [IN-7] - 5/8/2003
Rep Case, Ed [HI-2] - 5/8/2003
Rep Clay, Wm. Lacy [MO-1] - 7/24/2003
Rep Conyers, John, Jr. [MI-14] - 5/8/2003
Rep Crowley, Joseph [NY-7] - 7/17/2003
Rep Cummings, Elijah E. [MD-7] - 5/8/2003
Rep Davis, Danny K. [IL-7] - 5/8/2003
Rep DeGette, Diana [CO-1] - 5/21/2003
Rep Delahunt, William D. [MA-10] - 5/8/2003
Rep DeLauro, Rosa L. [CT-3] - 5/8/2003
Rep Deutsch, Peter [FL-20] - 5/19/2003
Rep Emanuel, Rahm [IL-5] - 5/8/2003
Rep Engel, Eliot L. [NY-17] - 5/8/2003
Rep Eshoo, Anna G. [CA-14] - 6/10/2003
Rep Evans, Lane [IL-17] - 6/14/2004
Rep Farr, Sam [CA-17] - 5/8/2003
Rep Fattah, Chaka [PA-2] - 5/8/2003
Rep Filner, Bob [CA-51] - 7/8/2003
Rep Frank, Barney [MA-4] - 5/8/2003
Rep Gephardt, Richard A. [MO-3] - 10/15/2003
Rep Gonzalez, Charles A. [TX-20] - 7/8/2003
Rep Grijalva, Raul M. [AZ-7] - 5/8/2003
Rep Gutierrez, Luis V. [IL-4] - 5/8/2003
Rep Harman, Jane [CA-36] - 5/8/2003
Rep Hastings, Alcee L. [FL-23] - 7/17/2003
Rep Hoeffel, Joseph M. [PA-13] - 5/8/2003
Rep Holt, Rush D. [NJ-12] - 5/8/2003
Rep Honda, Michael M. [CA-15] - 5/8/2003
Rep Hoyer, Steny H. [MD-5] - 7/25/2003
Rep Israel, Steve [NY-2] - 7/15/2003
Rep Jackson, Jesse L., Jr. [IL-2] - 5/8/2003
Rep Jackson-Lee, Sheila [TX-18] - 5/8/2003
Rep Johnson, Eddie Bernice [TX-30] - 5/8/2003
Rep Jones, Stephanie Tubbs [OH-11] - 7/24/2003
Rep Kennedy, Patrick J. [RI-1] - 5/8/2003
Rep Kilpatrick, Carolyn C. [MI-13] - 6/14/2004
Rep Kleczka, Gerald D. [WI-4] - 9/10/2003
Rep Kucinich, Dennis J. [OH-10] - 5/19/2003
Rep Langevin, James R. [RI-2] - 5/8/2003
Rep Lantos, Tom [CA-12] - 5/21/2003
Rep Larson, John B. [CT-1] - 6/3/2003
Rep Lee, Barbara [CA-9] - 5/8/2003
Rep Lewis, John [GA-5] - 5/8/2003
Rep Lipinski, William O. [IL-3] - 5/8/2003
Rep Lofgren, Zoe [CA-16] - 5/8/2003
Rep Lowey, Nita M. [NY-18] - 5/8/2003
Rep Maloney, Carolyn B. [NY-14] - 5/8/2003
Rep Markey, Edward J. [MA-7] - 5/8/2003
Rep Matsui, Robert T. [CA-5] - 7/8/2003
Rep McCollum, Betty [MN-4] - 6/16/2003
Rep McDermott, Jim [WA-7] - 6/3/2003
Rep McGovern, James P. [MA-3] - 5/8/2003
Rep Meehan, Martin T. [MA-5] - 5/8/2003
Rep Meeks, Gregory W. [NY-6] - 5/19/2003
Rep Menendez, Robert [NJ-13] - 5/8/2003
Rep Millender-McDonald, Juanita [CA-37] - 10/2/2003
Rep Miller, George [CA-7] - 5/19/2003
Rep Moran, James P. [VA-8] - 5/8/2003
Rep Nadler, Jerrold [NY-8] - 5/8/2003
Rep Napolitano, Grace F. [CA-38] - 10/2/2003
Rep Norton, Eleanor Holmes [DC] - 5/8/2003
Rep Olver, John W. [MA-1] - 5/21/2003
Rep Owens, Major R. [NY-11] - 5/8/2003
Rep Pallone, Frank, Jr. [NJ-6] - 11/18/2003
Rep Pascrell, Bill, Jr. [NJ-8] - 5/8/2003
Rep Pastor, Ed [AZ-4] - 9/3/2003
Rep Payne, Donald M. [NJ-10] - 5/8/2003
Rep Price, David E. [NC-4] - 9/3/2003
Rep Rangel, Charles B. [NY-15] - 5/8/2003
Rep Rothman, Steven R. [NJ-9] - 5/8/2003
Rep Roybal-Allard, Lucille [CA-34] - 5/8/2003
Rep Ruppersberger, C. A. Dutch [MD-2] - 1/20/2004
Rep Rush, Bobby L. [IL-1] - 5/8/2003
Rep Sabo, Martin Olav [MN-5] - 10/15/2003
Rep Sanchez, Linda T. [CA-39] - 5/8/2003
Rep Sanchez, Loretta [CA-47] - 5/8/2003
Rep Schakowsky, Janice D. [IL-9] - 5/8/2003
Rep Schiff, Adam B. [CA-29] - 7/17/2003
Rep Serrano, Jose E. [NY-16] - 6/10/2003
Rep Shays, Christopher [CT-4] - 5/8/2003
Rep Sherman, Brad [CA-27] - 5/21/2003
Rep Slaughter, Louise McIntosh [NY-28] - 6/23/2003
Rep Smith, Christopher H. [NJ-4] - 5/8/2003
Rep Solis, Hilda L. [CA-32] - 5/8/2003
Rep Stark, Fortney Pete [CA-13] - 5/8/2003
Rep Tauscher, Ellen O. [CA-10] - 5/8/2003
Rep Tierney, John F. [MA-6] - 5/8/2003
Rep Towns, Edolphus [NY-10] - 5/8/2003
Rep Van Hollen, Chris [MD-8] - 5/8/2003
Rep Velazquez, Nydia M. [NY-12] - 5/8/2003
Rep Waters, Maxine [CA-35] - 5/8/2003
Rep Watson, Diane E. [CA-33] - 5/8/2003
Rep Watt, Melvin L. [NC-12] - 9/24/2003
Rep Waxman, Henry A. [CA-30] - 5/8/2003
Rep Weiner, Anthony D. [NY-9] - 5/8/2003
Rep Wexler, Robert [FL-19] - 5/8/2003
Rep Woolsey, Lynn C. [CA-6] - 5/8/2003
Rep Wynn, Albert Russell [MD-4] - 10/17/2003
Rep Kind, Ron [WI-3] - 9/3/2003(withdrawn - 9/16/2003)

Bill Summary & Status - 108th Congress (2003 - 2004) - H.R.2038 - Cosponsors - THOMAS (Library of Congress)
Boy... that shut him up quick.
 
Whew...good thing we aren't Communists then. I love my guns...of course, I don't have military style weapons whose only purpose is to kill as many people as possible in the least amount of time.

All of our fundamental rights have "riders" on them. Why is this right so "untouchable" and can't have any restrictions on it?

The Second Amendment isn't a novelty.... It has a reason and it's reason is to arm the people with the intent of defending themselves from a tyrannical government..

People should have access to guns that can turn tyrants into Swiss Cheese.... That's the fucking point....

What good is a snubnose .38 against a fucking AR-15???

In theory the people should have access to the same weaponry as the armed forces...

Sure. Citizens should have missile launchers, tanks, black hawks. In reality, you're retarded.

The people should and some do...

There is nothing retarded about it considering the purpose of the Second Amendment...

Guns aren't only for self defense or hunting food - guns are for defense from tyranny. Like I said that was the idea behind the Second Amendment - to ensure people had adequate means to defend themselves from government, or means to attack the government if they threatened liberty....
 
Has Mitt Romney ever been involved with hunting wild game using guns?

I believe he bagged a salt vampire with his phazer set on stun.
He believes in catch and release.
 
The Second Amendment isn't a novelty.... It has a reason and it's reason is to arm the people with the intent of defending themselves from a tyrannical government..

People should have access to guns that can turn tyrants into Swiss Cheese.... That's the fucking point....

What good is a snubnose .38 against a fucking AR-15???

In theory the people should have access to the same weaponry as the armed forces...

Sure. Citizens should have missile launchers, tanks, black hawks. In reality, you're retarded.

The people should and some do...

There is nothing retarded about it considering the purpose of the Second Amendment...

Guns aren't only for self defense or hunting food - guns are for defense from tyranny. Like I said that was the idea behind the Second Amendment - to ensure people had adequate means to defend themselves from government, or means to attack the government if they threatened liberty....

Citizens should be allowed to have military grade weapons and vehicles? You really are retarded.
 
Keep talking Dems ! :clap2:

Four Democrats advocate gun control legislation following Colorado shooting


Four Democrats have come forward in the wake of the mass shooting in Aurora, Colo. to voice support for new legislation aimed to combat gun violence.

Colorado Rep. Diana DeGette, New York Rep. Carolyn McCarthy and New Jersey Sen. Bob Menendez joined Sen. Frank Lautenberg of New Jersey Tuesday to voice support for Lautenberg's bill outlawing the sale of high-capacity gun magazines.

"I hope that this does spark a national conversation about where we go in terms of reasonable gun control measures," Menendez told reporters gathered for a press conference on the issue. "So that no one like Alex Teves, who grew up in New Jersey and found himself in Colorado, will ever again be gunned down by a man who could build an arsenal with a click of a mouse and have it delivered to his door by the cart load--ammunition, high capacity clips, explosives, bomb-making materials--all within the law."

Four Democrats advocate gun control legislation following Colorado shooting | The Ticket - Yahoo! News

Only four?

That should make it easy for you to hunt them down and shoot them.

We certainly don't want any "Dems" speaking thier minds... :lol:
 
Has Mitt Romney ever been involved with hunting wild game using guns?

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-1ZTIbr8MuY]Mitt Romney, Varmint Hunter: "I've hunted a number of times" - YouTube[/ame]

Just Rodents and Varmints..
 
I "hear" a lot of things, but nothing I've ever heard has led me to believe that ANY elected official wants to outlaw private gun ownership

Then you haven't been paying attention.



Then you'll agree that Senator Feinstein, who I bet you have voted for, is incredibly ludicrous.

All told, HR2038 is a giant step closer to the goal stated by the assault-weapons ban sponsor, Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., on CBS "60 Minutes": "If I could have gotten 51 votes in the Senate of the United States for an outright ban, picking up every one of them -- Mr. and Mrs. America, turn them all in -- I would have done it."

2nd Amendment / Mr. and Mrs. America, turn them all in - SFGate

Yes it is ludicrous but that is why you keep posting the idea of ONE Dem. Because it cannot and will not ever happen no matter how much she wishes for it. In order for the "Dems want to ban weapons" meme to be true you have to find more than one voice....hence the use of the letter "s"

Maybe you have a problem reading, but Seawytch said "nothing I've ever heard has led me to believe that ANY elected official wants to outlaw private gun ownership".

I provided her with her "any," so the only thing ludicrous is that you're too cheap to buy a copy of Hooked on Phonics.
 
Keep talking Dems ! :clap2:

Four Democrats advocate gun control legislation following Colorado shooting


Four Democrats have come forward in the wake of the mass shooting in Aurora, Colo. to voice support for new legislation aimed to combat gun violence.

Colorado Rep. Diana DeGette, New York Rep. Carolyn McCarthy and New Jersey Sen. Bob Menendez joined Sen. Frank Lautenberg of New Jersey Tuesday to voice support for Lautenberg's bill outlawing the sale of high-capacity gun magazines.

"I hope that this does spark a national conversation about where we go in terms of reasonable gun control measures," Menendez told reporters gathered for a press conference on the issue. "So that no one like Alex Teves, who grew up in New Jersey and found himself in Colorado, will ever again be gunned down by a man who could build an arsenal with a click of a mouse and have it delivered to his door by the cart load--ammunition, high capacity clips, explosives, bomb-making materials--all within the law."

Four Democrats advocate gun control legislation following Colorado shooting | The Ticket - Yahoo! News

Is there a line in the bill that says, "Criminals really better obey this one or else, and we're not kiddin' around"?
 

Forum List

Back
Top