Foreclosure Defense (Use the UCC)

[Svarstaad]

. . .

Thank you for your non-specific, BS input.

It is obvious to me, that you are protecting the bank.

Probably a lawyer, shill.

Still writing in generalities.

There is something wrong with the comments you have made about the discussion subject matter.

Are you hiding a secret?

Refusal to discuss the issues presented, is a good indication of a provocateur.

Oh, well.

. . .

 

[goldcatt]

Why yes, I am a lawyer. And I work in real estate. Any questions?

 

[Svarstaad]

. . .

Why would anyone ask you a question, when you refuse to provide any answers?

How deceptive of you.

How typical of you, and your ilk.

. . .

 

[goldcatt]

What a way to make a good first impression!

Keep it up, you're at least mildly entertiaining.

 

[Svarstaad]

. . .

Still off point, Goldcatt.

Thanks for the opportunity to accelerate my posts to more than 15.

You just refuse to discuss STANDING. Don't you?

Where's the NOTE? (The bank sold the NOTE.)

Prove there is a valid assignment from the present holder.

Uh, oh.

Every UCC in 49 states require the same thing: validation of the right to enforce an instrument. (See UCC 3-301). Uniform Commercial Code - Article 3

Guess what --- That promissory NOTE, the unsuspecting "mark" "signed," IS a negotiable instrument (instrument).

I perceive that more BS is on the way from you . . .

And of course, never a straight answer (NASA).

How predictable of you.

. . .

 

[Svarstaad]

. . .

"Shill"

A shill is an associate of a person selling goods or services or a political group, who pretends no association to the seller/group and assumes the air of an enthusiastic customer. The intention of the shill is, using crowd psychology, to encourage others unaware of the set-up to purchase said goods or services or support the political group's ideological claims. Shills are often employed by confidence artists. The term plant is also used.

Shilling is illegal in many circumstances and in many jurisdictions[1] because of the frequently fraudulent and damaging character of their actions. However, if a shill does not place uninformed parties at a risk of loss, but merely generates "buzz", the shill's actions may be legal. For example, a person planted in an audience to laugh and applaud when desired (see claque), or to participate in on-stage activities as a "random member of the audience", is a type of legal shill.

"Shill" can also be used pejoratively to describe a critic who appears either all-too-eager to heap glowing praise upon mediocre offerings, or who acts as an apologist for glaring flaws. In this sense, they would be an implicit "shill" for the industry at large, possibly because their income is tied to its prosperity.

Legal Term: "shilling" Slang term for posing as an innocent bystander at a confidence game but giving aid and assistance to the perpetrators of the scheme as a decoy." (BLD6-1377).

. . .

 

[Colin]

Hey! Svartarse, whatever you call yourself, You've just been served mate...by someone who knows what they're talking about. Carry on wriggling though, I love watching worms wriggle when they have nowhere to go.

Admit it old chap, your knowledge is half arsed...just like your name. But I must admit, I do love watching an arrogant fool get served by a clever woman. Best entertainment this week!

Oh and do feel free to abuse me back. I shouldn't think you're very good at that either.

 

[Colin]

. . .

"Shill"

A shill is an associate of a person selling goods or services or a political group, who pretends no association to the seller/group and assumes the air of an enthusiastic customer. The intention of the shill is, using crowd psychology, to encourage others unaware of the set-up to purchase said goods or services or support the political group's ideological claims. Shills are often employed by confidence artists. The term plant is also used.

Shilling is illegal in many circumstances and in many jurisdictions[1] because of the frequently fraudulent and damaging character of their actions. However, if a shill does not place uninformed parties at a risk of loss, but merely generates "buzz", the shill's actions may be legal. For example, a person planted in an audience to laugh and applaud when desired (see claque), or to participate in on-stage activities as a "random member of the audience", is a type of legal shill.

"Shill" can also be used pejoratively to describe a critic who appears either all-too-eager to heap glowing praise upon mediocre offerings, or who acts as an apologist for glaring flaws. In this sense, they would be an implicit "shill" for the industry at large, possibly because their income is tied to its prosperity.

Legal Term: "shilling" Slang term for posing as an innocent bystander at a confidence game but giving aid and assistance to the perpetrators of the scheme as a decoy." (BLD6-1377).

. . .

Shyster:.....An unethical, unscrupulous practitioner, especially of law.


Yep. That just about sums you up.

 

[Svarstaad]

. . .

Very interesting.

You enter into a subject matter obviously far beyond your ability of comprehension and go immediately to vitriol and ridicule.

How cerebral of you.

. . .

 

[Svarstaad]

. . .

It seems that the subject matter introduced in the initial post in this thread, has attracted only those elements that are most threatened by the disclosure of the facts relevant to the subject matter.

Not one of the posts have honestly addressed any issue identified in the original subject matter.

The comments, posted to date, only serve to identify the ones making the comments as shills representing and protecting the criminals operating the scam.

No attempt has been made, by them, to address the issues.

How predictable.

. . .

 

[goldcatt]

Says the bozo who doesn't know enough abut the shit he's spouting to understand the very basic general concepts of what makes a law, States all have their own laws, different sets of laws can apply to any one situation, and most of all the glaring fact that if it were that fucking simple everyone would be doing it.

Keep making yourself look dumb. I'm enjoying this. I clean up the messes made by incompetent idiots like you for a living, boy. And I'm good at it. But even the best can't always save a family's home when they listen to some arrogant idiot who doesn't know jack. You are a disgrace.

But keep exercising that one active brain cell, maybe some day you'll find another to keep it company.

Oh, and have a nice day. Punk.

 

[The Rabbi]

Thanks Goldcatt. As I wrote, a little knowledge is a ridiculous thing. Adn Svaarcrap proves it over and over.

 

[Svarstaad]

. . .

It is revealing to discern that the comments by two others in this thread, one a lawyer, the other unknown, have never made an attempt to specifically discuss the subject matter. They opt to hurl personal attacks. Failing to provide any information of value about the subject matter.

Foreclosure Defense.

Person entitled to enforce the instrument UCC 3-301 . Uniform Commercial Code - Article 3

[UCC 3-301 adopted into the Alabama Code, http://www.legislature.state.al.us/CodeofAlabama/1975/7-3-301.htm

----------------------------

If the foreclosure claimant declares that the NOTE is destroyed, lost, or stolen, then the requirements of UCC 3-309 are applicable: Uniform Commercial Code - Article 3

[UCC 3-309 adopted into the Alabama Code http://www.legislature.state.al.us/CodeofAlabama/1975/7-3-309.htm

--------------------------

Defenses: Uniform Commercial Code - Article 3

[UCC 3-305 adopted into the Alabama Code http://www.legislature.state.al.us/CodeofAlabama/1975/7-3-305.htm

--------------------------

Could it be that there are those who prowl forums, like this one, to detect any real effort to inform others about real tactics that could be effectively used against the criminal banks?

The Cornell UCC state locator can be found here: LII: UCC - Locator

. . .

 

[manu1959]

Svarstaad....interesting stuff....can you cite a case where this argument was put forth in us court and upheld on appeal....thank you

 

[Colin]

Hey Svartarse! Stick to what you do best. Selling snake oil to the gullible!

 

[California Girl]

Hey Svartarse! Stick to what you do best. Selling snake oil to the gullible!

That seems to sum it up nicely - with the usual British 'straight to the point' forthrightness. Nice one Colin.

 

[GHook93]

The Mortgage companies made a ton of bad loans, but they didn't fuck up their documents enough to get screwed like you are talking about.

 

[Svarstaad]

. . .

Go To: 98489 -- Landmark National Bank v. Kesler -- Leben -- Kansas Court of Appeals

Actually READ a court decision. (August 2009).

LANDMARK NATIONAL BANK,
Plaintiff/Appellee,
v.
BOYD A. KESLER,
Appellee/Cross-Appellant,

MILLENNIA MORTGAGE CORP.,
Defendant,

MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION
SYSTEMS, INC. AND SOVEREIGN BANK,
Appellants/Cross-Appellees,

and

DENNIS BRISTOW AND TONY WOYDZIAK,

Intervenors/Appellees.

98489 -- Landmark National Bank v. Kesler -- Leben -- Kansas Court of Appeals

. . .

 

[Svarstaad]

. . .

It seems that those who already have their minds made up, refuse to do any more research.

Could it be that those so adamantly opposed to foreclosure defenses being revealed, are those individuals fully complicit with the banking scam?

. . .

 

[Colin]

. . .

It seems that those who already have their minds made up, refuse to do any more research.

Could it be that those so adamantly opposed to foreclosure defenses being revealed, are those individuals fully complicit with the banking scam?

. . .

Not really. It's just clear that a qualified lawyer like Goldcatt obviously knows a lot more about the subject than a cut and paste amateur.