Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Rush is a bought off LIAR. The namecalling is just stupid.
3,074 posts to your name and you've still yet to back up one thing you claim.
When does that happen ? When you hit 5,000 ?
If you have access to something called the Interwebs, you can go to a secret site called GOOGLE and find out that what franco said is true. Go ahead, try it. Its really way cool.
My disagreement with Media Matters is that they are trying AT ALL to silence their opponent.
Well gee willikers, sweetie pie, why don't you write to them and tell them that. I'm sure they'll stop right away if you just talk from your heart.
But has anything really changed?
A bunch of poor spellers stapled tea bags to their silly hats and tried to pretend they're a political party. they have that right.
Why is it okay for the GObP, Bain, morms, Koch's, Heritage to band together and pay lushbo to spew shit?
Why is it okay for them but not for those - of BOTH parties - to band together to state their opinion?
The problem is that the masses have gotten plumb stupit and believe that crap they spew.
Wrong.
The problem is that plumb stupid dimwits like you don't believe what we used to hold so dear and what we knew was right.
The problem isn't the tea party. The problem is the dishonest reaction of tools like you to the fairly simple but rational things they seek.
You can't out-debate them, so you try to silence them, marginalize them or ridicule them. All the while you cannot figure out that it is you who are so far out of line and off base.
You are no longer willing to even try to listen and learn.
3,074 posts to your name and you've still yet to back up one thing you claim.
When does that happen ? When you hit 5,000 ?
If you have access to something called the Interwebs, you can go to a secret site called GOOGLE and find out that what franco said is true. Go ahead, try it. Its really way cool.
My disagreement with Media Matters is that they are trying AT ALL to silence their opponent.
Well gee willikers, sweetie pie, why don't you write to them and tell them that. I'm sure they'll stop right away if you just talk from your heart.
The pettiness of your post exposes you for what you are muddly.dullwit.
What liability is saying, in essence, is that he is against liberals voting with their opinions. In fact, many rw's are also against what lushbo said but he has no problem with that. Nor does he have a problem with rw's organizations gathering members or signatures to influence things to their side.
Its actually a pretty silly thread and sadly, wasted time none of us will ever get back.
Note to liability - this in the United States. Until the GObP/pubs/rw's get their way, we have rights.
Deal with it.
Rush is a bought off LIAR. The namecalling is just stupid.
3,074 posts to your name and you've still yet to back up one thing you claim.
When does that happen ? When you hit 5,000 ?
If you have access to something called the Interwebs, you can go to a secret site called GOOGLE and find out that what franco said is true. Go ahead, try it. Its really way cool.
If you have access to something called the Interwebs, you can go to a secret site called GOOGLE and find out that what franco said is true. Go ahead, try it. Its really way cool.
Well gee willikers, sweetie pie, why don't you write to them and tell them that. I'm sure they'll stop right away if you just talk from your heart.
The pettiness of your post exposes you for what you are muddly.dullwit.
Really?
I notice you didn't respond to any of my serious, factual posts and no wonder. Your style is to huff and puff and then throw a tantrum. You really seem to believe that juvenile name calling will get you what you want so you don't even try to converse or debate.
Carry on sonny boy because you are no threat to those who strive to understand the issues.
NOT a poll. I lift this question from another (related) thread where it is apparently going to be ignored. So, let's highlight it in its own little box:
Is the effort of Media Matters to get Rush Limbaugh off the air* a valid move that gives due consideration for the value we place on free speech and the open market of competing ideas?
I say that Media Matters is WAY off base. I say YOU libs OUGHT to be agreeing with me on that.
What do you liberal members of the USMB have to say?
__________________________
* See, for instance: Media Matters ad campaign aims to censor Rush Limbaugh | Washington Times Communities
And see its own website, where Media Matters talks of "monitoring" the advertising on Rush's radio show: Rush Limbaugh's Advertisers, March 6 | Media Matters for America
It's ironic but I was thinking about this last week. I, too do not ever want to see Rush Limbaugh censored or forcibly banned from the airwaves, not that way. To see his advertisers dry up and his ratings go way down because of people just not interested in Rush... YES!
NOT a poll. I lift this question from another (related) thread where it is apparently going to be ignored. So, let's highlight it in its own little box:
Is the effort of Media Matters to get Rush Limbaugh off the air* a valid move that gives due consideration for the value we place on free speech and the open market of competing ideas?
I say that Media Matters is WAY off base. I say YOU libs OUGHT to be agreeing with me on that.
What do you liberal members of the USMB have to say?
__________________________
* See, for instance: Media Matters ad campaign aims to censor Rush Limbaugh | Washington Times Communities
And see its own website, where Media Matters talks of "monitoring" the advertising on Rush's radio show: Rush Limbaugh's Advertisers, March 6 | Media Matters for America
It's ironic but I was thinking about this last week. I, too do not ever want to see Rush Limbaugh censored or forcibly banned from the airwaves, not that way. To see his advertisers dry up and his ratings go way down because of people just not interested in Rush... YES!
You think he's going to go the way of Air America? I didn't think they should be banned either, but the lack of interest took care of that. It should work that way. People have every right to express themselves, though way more have been interested in what Rush has to say than a bunch of liberals on the air.
If you allow government to trample Rush's freedom of speech, you are ceding own. We either all have freedom or none of us do.
It's ironic but I was thinking about this last week. I, too do not ever want to see Rush Limbaugh censored or forcibly banned from the airwaves, not that way. To see his advertisers dry up and his ratings go way down because of people just not interested in Rush... YES!
You think he's going to go the way of Air America? I didn't think they should be banned either, but the lack of interest took care of that. It should work that way. People have every right to express themselves, though way more have been interested in what Rush has to say than a bunch of liberals on the air.
If you allow government to trample Rush's freedom of speech, you are ceding own. We either all have freedom or none of us do.
I do, I think Rush will retire within a few years because America will grow tired of his flaming hate-speech. Rush himself is probably more than willing to give it a rest.
You think he's going to go the way of Air America? I didn't think they should be banned either, but the lack of interest took care of that. It should work that way. People have every right to express themselves, though way more have been interested in what Rush has to say than a bunch of liberals on the air.
If you allow government to trample Rush's freedom of speech, you are ceding own. We either all have freedom or none of us do.
I do, I think Rush will retire within a few years because America will grow tired of his flaming hate-speech. Rush himself is probably more than willing to give it a rest.
And you can bet the next "entertainer" will be there to take his place.
I do, I think Rush will retire within a few years because America will grow tired of his flaming hate-speech. Rush himself is probably more than willing to give it a rest.
And you can bet the next "entertainer" will be there to take his place.
Who? I was thinking the same. Who can replace Rush? Mike Huckabee? He's trying to take out Rush as we speak. In my opinion, there will never be another Rush... never. Not even close.
And you can bet the next "entertainer" will be there to take his place.
Who? I was thinking the same. Who can replace Rush? Mike Huckabee? He's trying to take out Rush as we speak. In my opinion, there will never be another Rush... never. Not even close.
Rush exists because there is a market for him.
My biggest fear is that he get driven out of the business and someone WORSE takes his place.
Rush is the main guy in conservative talk radio because he has been there a while, he formed his own network, he markets himself pretty well, he is good at what he does, he says interesting things (most of the time) and he is generally consistent in examining things through the filter of a conservative lens. That and he can be pretty funny.
Lots of libs cannot handle his wit or his thinking, so they lash out in frustration and anger.
It's kinda funny to see.
Because of the time frame he is on the air, I don't get to listen to him as much as I might like. But it's all good because I still get to listen to Levin. I prefer Levin. He too causes mental instability in lots of witless libs. But Levin is a genuine conservative philosopher and a hell of a good solid principled conservative spokesman.
Media Nutters will try to go after him, too, someday especially if they are emboldened by the shit they are attempting to do against Limbaugh.
They do not want to permit the opposition voice to be heard. They want to roll over all dissenting voices and silence them.
Rush is the main guy in conservative talk radio because he has been there a while, he formed his own network, he markets himself pretty well, he is good at what he does, he says interesting things (most of the time) and he is generally consistent in examining things through the filter of a conservative lens. That and he can be pretty funny.
Lots of libs cannot handle his wit or his thinking, so they lash out in frustration and anger.
It's kinda funny to see.
Because of the time frame he is on the air, I don't get to listen to him as much as I might like. But it's all good because I still get to listen to Levin. I prefer Levin. He too causes mental instability in lots of witless libs. But Levin is a genuine conservative philosopher and a hell of a good solid principled conservative spokesman.
Media Nutters will try to go after him, too, someday especially if they are emboldened by the shit they are attempting to do against Limbaugh.
They do not want to permit the opposition voice to be heard. They want to roll over all dissenting voices and silence them.
Try thinking outside the box you are currently in.
Rush is the main guy in conservative talk radio because he has been there a while, he formed his own network, he markets himself pretty well, he is good at what he does, he says interesting things (most of the time) and he is generally consistent in examining things through the filter of a conservative lens. That and he can be pretty funny.
Lots of libs cannot handle his wit or his thinking, so they lash out in frustration and anger.
It's kinda funny to see.
Because of the time frame he is on the air, I don't get to listen to him as much as I might like. But it's all good because I still get to listen to Levin. I prefer Levin. He too causes mental instability in lots of witless libs. But Levin is a genuine conservative philosopher and a hell of a good solid principled conservative spokesman.
Media Nutters will try to go after him, too, someday especially if they are emboldened by the shit they are attempting to do against Limbaugh.
They do not want to permit the opposition voice to be heard. They want to roll over all dissenting voices and silence them.
