- Thread starter
- #21
Ian, Thanks for the excercise. I see that crick is just a jiminie and nothing more. the individual is a pure adolescent. Anyone reading this exercise could only make one observation, complete lack of cooperation from a flaming jiminie idiot. Thank you!!
thanks jc.
I will give an example of the typical response to McIntyre from the elite guard of the warmers. First they scoff and ridicule. then they make up a bandaid excuse for laymen to think he has been refuted while the other scientists in climate science seemingly just avert their eyes. then after a few years they publish a new paper that incorporates the McIntyre correction with no acknowledgement. the public usually did not hear the original criticism and simply thinks science is moving forward.
eg. Briffa has been producing treering paleo reconstructions for decades and McIntyre has been poking holes in them. in 2009 Briffa was finally forced to release his data and McIntrye jumped on the opportunity to show what the reconstruction should actually look like. Briffa and the hockey team lashed out with ad homs and ridiculed McIntrye's use of 'data found on the internet'. in 2012 Briffa released his latest study and, sure enough, it looked exactly like the correction McIntyre produced earlier.
this latest Pages2K paper has also incorporated some of the criticisms leveled by Climmate Audit, but not before AR5 used the faulty data for its report. there are other problems left in Pages2K that may or may not be corrected in the future. only time will tell but you can be sure that McIntyre will not be given credit for finding them.
I could go on and on giving examples but it has been writen here before. crick is doing himself a disservice by not getting the information available as to why 'climate science is NOT settled'. he also doesnt understand that many of the changes in climate science are being forced by legitimate criticisms by the 'deniers'. his precious climate sensitivity of 2-4.5C has been trashed by over a dozen papers in the last couple of years that show it to be under 2C. every new paleo reconstruction shows a larger MWP and lower LIA. CO2 seems to be more correlated to the homogenization adjustments than to being the control knob for climate.
rant off/