For all the talk about Bush being like Hitler back in the day

[ABikerSailor]

Enough with this Roman conquer shit...

Bush hated Saddam - he used Iraq as an "Armageddon" of sorts.... You know a "come and get me battle spot."

We're not stealing nations....

Obama on the other hand melts in the hand of the UN like M&M's - he wants globalism..

Wouldn't have had a problem if Jr. had actually invaded the country that was responsible for 9/11.

Which country???

Individuals were responsible for the attack NOT countries...

Many countries were pleased but not responsible.

You're right........which is why we should have stayed the fuck out of Iraq.

 

[Mr.Nick]

Baracknophobia is rampant here.

You do realize that once elected Hitler seized power by deception and decree and then killed thousands of his political opponents to stay in power right?

Get back to us when Baracks secret police start rounding up Republicans, and lining them up to be shot. K.

Hitler had to confiscate guns before he went around killing people. It did not happen in three years time either.

Why do people think Hitler supported gun control? - Yahoo!7 Answers

Why do people think Hitler supported gun control?

The Nazi party loosened not restricted gun control. The 1938 German Weapons Act deregulated all rifles and shotguns and ammunition, expanded those exempt from gun restrictions, lowered the minimum age to acquire a gun license and extended the length of gun permits. Only for Jews was gun ownership banned. Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_politic…
Yet regularly people, particular on this site, claim he favoured tighter gun control. Is this just part of the trend of comparing your opponents to Hitler without any real evidence or do people actually believe it?

One could say the UK has a "loosened restriction" given the notion that 5-0 pigs can possess guns...

I suppose it's all just all a matter of perception.

 

[koshergrl]

We didn't invade Iraq because of 9/11. That's a lie perpetuated by the retards who thought we deserved 9/11 and who wanted us to continue to get spanked by the mentally ill lunatics of the middle east.

The invasion of Iraq was for a completely different reason.

 

[ABikerSailor]

We didn't invade Iraq because of 9/11. That's a lie perpetuated by the retards who thought we deserved 9/11 and who wanted us to continue to get spanked by the mentally ill lunatics of the middle east.

The invasion of Iraq was for a completely different reason.

Then why did we invade? Jr. said it was to get those responsible for 9/11.

 

[Mr.Nick]

Wouldn't have had a problem if Jr. had actually invaded the country that was responsible for 9/11.

Which country???

Individuals were responsible for the attack NOT countries...

Many countries were pleased but not responsible.

You're right........which is why we should have stayed the fuck out of Iraq.

Why?

Leave Saddam to continue to torture and murder people at will, his sons to boot?

Saddam should have hung from a rope back in the 80's..

I suppose a bird in the hand is worth two in the bush er BOOOOOOOOSH...

 

[koshergrl]

We didn't invade Iraq because of 9/11. That's a lie perpetuated by the retards who thought we deserved 9/11 and who wanted us to continue to get spanked by the mentally ill lunatics of the middle east.

The invasion of Iraq was for a completely different reason.

Then why did we invade? Jr. said it was to get those responsible for 9/11.

No he didn't, you nitwit.

 

[koshergrl]

"
We removed Saddam Hussein from power because he was a threat to our security. He had pursued and used weapons of mass destruction. He sponsored terrorists. He ordered his military to shoot at American and British pilots patrolling the no-fly zones. He invaded his neighbors. He fought a war against the United States and a broad coalition. He had declared that the United States of America was his enemy.
Over the course of a decade, Saddam Hussein refused to comply with more than a dozen United Nations resolutions -- including demands that he respect the rights of the Iraqi people, disclose his weapons, and abide by the terms of a 1991 cease-fire. He deceived international inspectors, and he denied them the unconditional access they needed to do their jobs. When a unanimous Security Council gave him one final chance to disclose and disarm, or face serious consequences, he refused to comply with that final opportunity. At any point along the way, Saddam Hussein could have avoided war by complying with the just demands of the international community. The United States did not choose war -- the choice was Saddam Hussein’s….
At the same time, we must remember that an investigation after the war by chief weapons inspector Charles Duelfer found that Saddam was using the U.N. oil-for-food program to influence countries and companies in an effort to undermine sanctions, with the intent of restarting his weapons programs once the sanctions collapsed and the world looked the other way….
As I stated in a speech in the lead-up to the war, a liberated Iraq could show the power of freedom to transform the Middle East by bringing hope and progress to the lives of millions…. History has shown that free nations are peaceful nations. And as Iraqi democracy takes hold, Iraqi citizens will have a stake in a common and peaceful future."

Does anyone see 9/11 mentioned?

Free Frank Warner: This is news: Bush actually lists reasons for invading Iraq

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

We didn't invade Iraq because of 9/11. That's a lie perpetuated by the retards who thought we deserved 9/11 and who wanted us to continue to get spanked by the mentally ill lunatics of the middle east.

The invasion of Iraq was for a completely different reason.

Then why did we invade? Jr. said it was to get those responsible for 9/11.

19 different cease fire violations and kicking out the nuclear inspectors.

Facts

 

[koshergrl]

And in 6 months he'll claim again that we invaded Iraq because of 9/11.

It's what they do. They repeat a slogan so often it becomes ingrained into the consciousness of the populace, and people think it's true. No matter HOW MANY TIMES they're shown the evidence to the contrary.

 

[koshergrl]

And regardless of the fact that they probably WITNESSED the truth...I think most of us watched Bush's speech when we invaded. We have it on tape still, and there are transcripts available. So WHY do you suppose this wrong-headed insistence that he said we invaded for other reasons?

I think it might be another case of anti-American "We Know What He REALLY meant and what he was REALLY thinking and we'll just go with THAT."

 

[Political Junky]

We didn't invade Iraq because of 9/11. That's a lie perpetuated by the retards who thought we deserved 9/11 and who wanted us to continue to get spanked by the mentally ill lunatics of the middle east.

The invasion of Iraq was for a completely different reason.

Then why did we invade? Jr. said it was to get those responsible for 9/11.

19 different cease fire violations and kicking out the nuclear inspectors.

Facts

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KvDe7Z-ykDo]Bush kicked out weapons inspectors not Saddam (2003) - YouTube[/ame]

 

[koshergrl]

Good grief.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

Then why did we invade? Jr. said it was to get those responsible for 9/11.

19 different cease fire violations and kicking out the nuclear inspectors.

Facts

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KvDe7Z-ykDo]Bush kicked out weapons inspectors not Saddam (2003) - YouTube[/ame]

Bush didn't have that power, they were UN inspectors numbskull. He only warned them of impending death from bombs if they stayed.

 

[daveman]

Baracknophobia is rampant here.

You do realize that once elected Hitler seized power by deception and decree and then killed thousands of his political opponents to stay in power right?

Get back to us when Baracks secret police start rounding up Republicans, and lining them up to be shot. K.

[email protected]

Get the facts. Fight the smears. — AttackWatch.com

Baby steps, Boo. Baby steps.

 

[daveman]

Wrong........if the GOP wins, we will turn into a fascist nation.

Wake up. Were already on that path.

You do know the definition of fascism, right?

Lemmie help you out.........

fas·cist
   [fash-ist] Show IPA

noun
1. a person who believes in or sympathizes with fascism.

2. ( often initial capital letter ) a member of a fascist movement or party.

3. a person who is dictatorial or has extreme right-wing views.

Fascist | Define Fascist at Dictionary.com

Like I said......if the GOP wins, we become a fascist nation, because in order for anyone currently in the GOP race to get the base, they keep moving farther and farther right.

Definition of FASCISM

1
often capitalized : a political philosophy, movement, or regime (as that of the Fascisti) that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition



Hmmm...kinda sounds familiar.

 

[daveman]

Here ya go Kosher Twit..........14 defining characteristics of fascism from a scholar who actually studies this subject........

Dr. Lawrence Britt has examined the fascist regimes of Hitler (Germany), Mussolini (Italy), Franco (Spain), Suharto (Indonesia) and several Latin American regimes. Britt found 14 defining characteristics common to each:

One Nation, Underrated

During the 2004 election cycle, an email chain letter began circulating, attributed to one "Dr. Lawrence Britt, a political scientist," who had apparently written a 14-point article listing the defining characteristics of fascist regimes. There was something to the email, and we'll get to it in a minute, but first let's address a few misconceptions. First of all, there is no "Dr. Lawrence Britt." The author of the 14-point fascism inventory, Laurence Britt, is a former corporate executive who wrote and published a dystopian novel about right-wing extremism, titled June 2004, during the height of the Lewinsky scandal. That is, to the best of my knowledge, his only published volume.

In the real June 2004, he achieved some level of fame with an op-ed published in the humanist magazine Free Inquiry. This op-ed was forwarded around from inbox to inbox, and readers eventually began putting a "Dr." in front of his name and referring to him as a political scientist who had compiled the fascism inventory independently of the Bush administration. He had not done so, and had never claimed to do so. The article was, and had always been intended to be, an argument against the Bush administration.

Does that mean that his article is invalid? Not at all. All of the 14 points he identifies can potentially threaten our civil liberties, and they are all points that the United States has in common with the twentieth century's most frightening fascist regimes. The trouble is that they're also points that the United States has in common with many non-fascist regimes, and in some cases represent longstanding elements of U.S. political culture.
​

You've been had.

 

[Political Junky]

Fascism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

[koshergrl]

no, bush invaded sovereign nations to nation build as is obama
its just a matter of management style and packaging ...coke or pepsi

Enough with this Roman conquer shit...

Bush hated Saddam - he used Iraq as an "Armageddon" of sorts.... You know a "come and get me battle spot."

We're not stealing nations....

Obama on the other hand melts in the hand of the UN like M&M's - he wants globalism..

Wouldn't have had a problem if Jr. had actually invaded the country that was responsible for 9/11.

Sorry. The invasion of Iraq was NOT for 9/11, you fucking retard.

 

[Political Junky]

BBC NEWS | Americas | Bush administration on Iraq 9/11 link

Bush administration on Iraq 9/11 link
US President George W Bush has explicitly stated for the first time that there is no evidence that Saddam Hussein was involved in the 11 September attacks.

Bush maintains Saddam Hussein and al-Qaeda are connected
Mr Bush has never directly accused the former Iraqi leader of having a hand in the attacks on New York and Washington, but he has repeatedly associated the two in keynote addresses delivered since 11 September. Senior members of his administration have similarly conflated the two.

A recent opinion poll suggests that 70% of Americans believe the Iraqi leader was personally involved in the attacks.

Despite his stated rejection of any clear link between Saddam Hussein and the events of that day, Mr Bush continues to assert that the deposed president had ties with al-Qaeda, the terrorist network blamed for the 11 September attacks.
<more>

 

[paulitician]

Obama is Bush on Steroids. So i guess that makes him twice the Hitler Bush was. Obama shows no regard for our Constitution. In fact, he shows outright disdain for it. And so do all other Socialists/Progressives. I guess we'll see if Americans want four more years of this. I'm really hoping they don't.