For 8 years the right has been called racist.

[Remodeling Maidiac]

You get called racist because of all the racist shit you say !

5 min in this place is all you need to get a good dose of deplorables.

FAIL

"This place" didn't block Obama. Congress did, and not very well at that.

They blocked Obama and vowed to do so before he was sworn in. Why do you think they did that? And why is your conclusion of why they did it better than someone elses who concludes they did it because he's black?

Your opinion means more than everyone elses?

Because he was a radical leftist.

Class dismissed

 

[hadit]

There is not a Democrat anywhere that supports flying the Confederate Flag
That is a position of TODAYs Republicans who hide their racism in a broad States Rights position

the whole "states' rights" thing is a scam that they think would allow them to have jim crow laws again.

State's rights is not about ignoring the constitution, which would have to occur to re-instate Jim Crow Laws. The only way that would happen is if we get another Plessey type SC judgement that overtsteps the courts power, and ignores the 14th amendment.

State's rights is about letting the States manage things that are 1) Not Explicitly given to the Feds and 2) Explicitly protected as a right of the people by the Federal Constitution and incorporated onto the States as well.

Well, Reagan did give a tacit call out to racists when he introduced the term at the Neshoba County fair here in Miss kicking off his 1980 primary run. However, to me, you can make an argument that there is a necessity to have natl regulation of commerce (including healthcare and educational standards) but leave the social issue stuff up to the states. And, we can block grant stuff like fed aid to medical indigents and even special education (assuming we want to fund that nationally).

As for Jim Crow Laws, just enforcing the 14th prevents that from ever arising. And, yes the current Supreme Court is not enforcing the equal protection clause with states opting to make it harder for blacks and the poor to vote.

This one?! LOL!!

Sure. REagan gave a speech in a place where several miles away, a long time ago, something racist happened.


And this is presented as "Evidence" of GOP racism...



If you are forced to use such weak "evidence" it is time to admit that you are wrong.


Reagan did not call out to racists.

actually lee Atwater said at the time he was going to run the southern strategy and he intentionally dog-whistled to racists. no, Reagan wasn't a racist.... but he set out to appeal to them. it seems silly at best, dishonest at worst, to deny the implication of where that campaign was kicked off.

Since his campaign was kicked off via a taped message recorded in New York, why is that significant?

 

[hadit]

State's rights is not about ignoring the constitution, which would have to occur to re-instate Jim Crow Laws. The only way that would happen is if we get another Plessey type SC judgement that overtsteps the courts power, and ignores the 14th amendment.

State's rights is about letting the States manage things that are 1) Not Explicitly given to the Feds and 2) Explicitly protected as a right of the people by the Federal Constitution and incorporated onto the States as well.

Well, Reagan did give a tacit call out to racists when he introduced the term at the Neshoba County fair here in Miss kicking off his 1980 primary run. However, to me, you can make an argument that there is a necessity to have natl regulation of commerce (including healthcare and educational standards) but leave the social issue stuff up to the states. And, we can block grant stuff like fed aid to medical indigents and even special education (assuming we want to fund that nationally).

As for Jim Crow Laws, just enforcing the 14th prevents that from ever arising. And, yes the current Supreme Court is not enforcing the equal protection clause with states opting to make it harder for blacks and the poor to vote.

This one?! LOL!!

Sure. REagan gave a speech in a place where several miles away, a long time ago, something racist happened.


And this is presented as "Evidence" of GOP racism...



If you are forced to use such weak "evidence" it is time to admit that you are wrong.


Reagan did not call out to racists.

actually lee Atwater said at the time he was going to run the southern strategy and he intentionally dog-whistled to racists. no, Reagan wasn't a racist.... but he set out to appeal to them. it seems silly at best, dishonest at worst, to deny the implication of where that campaign was kicked off.

the dog whistle was more about State's needed less of the DOJ telling them how to run elections. (and education and Medicaid and all that block grant stuff). It was a clear signal that guy's like Ed Meese would be vetting Judges, and O'Connor (who had a history of election law), Scalia and Bork were the first team.

Whether one thinks the fed govt should be involved in elections when the constitution reserves that power for the states is up to individuals, but that was the message and Reagan delivered.

the mechanics of elections are are the province of the state. but those mechanics have to exist within the federal constutional guarantees of equal protection.

That's one of the things that tripped up Algore's attempts to cherrypick counties to re-re-recount.

 

[jillian]

Well, Reagan did give a tacit call out to racists when he introduced the term at the Neshoba County fair here in Miss kicking off his 1980 primary run. However, to me, you can make an argument that there is a necessity to have natl regulation of commerce (including healthcare and educational standards) but leave the social issue stuff up to the states. And, we can block grant stuff like fed aid to medical indigents and even special education (assuming we want to fund that nationally).

As for Jim Crow Laws, just enforcing the 14th prevents that from ever arising. And, yes the current Supreme Court is not enforcing the equal protection clause with states opting to make it harder for blacks and the poor to vote.

This one?! LOL!!

Sure. REagan gave a speech in a place where several miles away, a long time ago, something racist happened.


And this is presented as "Evidence" of GOP racism...


If you are forced to use such weak "evidence" it is time to admit that you are wrong.


Reagan did not call out to racists.

actually lee Atwater said at the time he was going to run the southern strategy and he intentionally dog-whistled to racists. no, Reagan wasn't a racist.... but he set out to appeal to them. it seems silly at best, dishonest at worst, to deny the implication of where that campaign was kicked off.

the dog whistle was more about State's needed less of the DOJ telling them how to run elections. (and education and Medicaid and all that block grant stuff). It was a clear signal that guy's like Ed Meese would be vetting Judges, and O'Connor (who had a history of election law), Scalia and Bork were the first team.

Whether one thinks the fed govt should be involved in elections when the constitution reserves that power for the states is up to individuals, but that was the message and Reagan delivered.

the mechanics of elections are are the province of the state. but those mechanics have to exist within the federal constutional guarantees of equal protection.

Yes, and O'Connor's explanation of her view of equal protection in Bush v. Gore is a nightmare. LOL W was going to win even if the feds had stayed the hell out of it, as they should have done.

bush v gore is an irrelevancy... it's such a tortured, decision that the justices said it has no value as precedent in any other case.

 

[jillian]

the whole "states' rights" thing is a scam that they think would allow them to have jim crow laws again.

State's rights is not about ignoring the constitution, which would have to occur to re-instate Jim Crow Laws. The only way that would happen is if we get another Plessey type SC judgement that overtsteps the courts power, and ignores the 14th amendment.

State's rights is about letting the States manage things that are 1) Not Explicitly given to the Feds and 2) Explicitly protected as a right of the people by the Federal Constitution and incorporated onto the States as well.

Well, Reagan did give a tacit call out to racists when he introduced the term at the Neshoba County fair here in Miss kicking off his 1980 primary run. However, to me, you can make an argument that there is a necessity to have natl regulation of commerce (including healthcare and educational standards) but leave the social issue stuff up to the states. And, we can block grant stuff like fed aid to medical indigents and even special education (assuming we want to fund that nationally).

As for Jim Crow Laws, just enforcing the 14th prevents that from ever arising. And, yes the current Supreme Court is not enforcing the equal protection clause with states opting to make it harder for blacks and the poor to vote.

This one?! LOL!!

Sure. REagan gave a speech in a place where several miles away, a long time ago, something racist happened.


And this is presented as "Evidence" of GOP racism...



If you are forced to use such weak "evidence" it is time to admit that you are wrong.


Reagan did not call out to racists.

actually lee Atwater said at the time he was going to run the southern strategy and he intentionally dog-whistled to racists. no, Reagan wasn't a racist.... but he set out to appeal to them. it seems silly at best, dishonest at worst, to deny the implication of where that campaign was kicked off.

Since his campaign was kicked off via a taped message recorded in New York, why is that significant?

non sequitur ... .but nice deflection

 

[bendog]

This one?! LOL!!

Sure. REagan gave a speech in a place where several miles away, a long time ago, something racist happened.


And this is presented as "Evidence" of GOP racism...


If you are forced to use such weak "evidence" it is time to admit that you are wrong.


Reagan did not call out to racists.

actually lee Atwater said at the time he was going to run the southern strategy and he intentionally dog-whistled to racists. no, Reagan wasn't a racist.... but he set out to appeal to them. it seems silly at best, dishonest at worst, to deny the implication of where that campaign was kicked off.

the dog whistle was more about State's needed less of the DOJ telling them how to run elections. (and education and Medicaid and all that block grant stuff). It was a clear signal that guy's like Ed Meese would be vetting Judges, and O'Connor (who had a history of election law), Scalia and Bork were the first team.

Whether one thinks the fed govt should be involved in elections when the constitution reserves that power for the states is up to individuals, but that was the message and Reagan delivered.

the mechanics of elections are are the province of the state. but those mechanics have to exist within the federal constutional guarantees of equal protection.

Yes, and O'Connor's explanation of her view of equal protection in Bush v. Gore is a nightmare. LOL W was going to win even if the feds had stayed the hell out of it, as they should have done.

bush v gore is an irrelevancy... it's such a tortured, decision that the justices said it has no value as precedent in any other case.

A sad footnote on her legacy. Equal Protection is afforded to maj minority counties despite the min counties using less accurate polling mechanisms because of less funding that more affluent maj white counties.

But the basis of Reagan's southern strategy was telling WHITE southerners (and that's who is at the Neshoba County fair) that the feds were going to go away.

I believe in state's rights; I believe in people doing as much as they can for themselves at the community level and at the private level. And I believe that we've distorted the balance of our government today by giving powers that were never intended in the constitution to that federal establishment. And if I do get the job I'm looking for, I'm going to devote myself to trying to reorder those priorities and to restore to the states and local communities those functions which properly belong there.

I would argue that is NOT racist.

 

[TheDude]

Simple to explain:

1. The liberal make-up is an emotionally unstrung angry people, who feel that in spite of basic science and math, we need to pull a rabbit out of our collective butts and level the playing field. This is why they get so angry. Meanwhile, I just read on Yahoo how Republicans are made up of angry white men. Can you imagine "the Democrats are made up of angry black women".......Liberals as a unit are hypocrites and they're just not rational people.

2. They champion projection. BLM is a great example. You know, blame the cops because the black community is out of control? Liberals as a unit validate the old saying that "When you point one finger, there are three fingers pointing back to you."

3. Reflect back on #1, and #2 as well. The Democrat machine recognizes this and uses it against them. Most of their rhetoric is trash, and really, it's intended as a diversion, and to control thought. That's where PC comes in. This election couldn't provide a greater example: Clinton is a crook, but you know, Trump tried to kiss 12 helpless women. Seriously libs., you're too easy.

 

[martybegan]

we have been deporting people. the numbers of people coming in has been flat for ages.

the games are yours. if you don't like the labels you get, stop nominating people who call mexicans rapists, a latina beauty queen "miss housekeeping" (which doesn't even begin to touch on the disgusting things your orange loser says about women) and stop cheering every time black kids get killed.

now go pretend that you don't vote for bigoted policies. in normal society, a man who re-tweets white supremacists wouldn't even be considered acceptable to have lunch with, much less represent this country to the world.

the bigger joke is that your ilk doesn't care if your electoral system is hacked by putin. how much must you hate your country.

Again the flat out lie that Trump called "mexicans rapists." He said rapists come across the border from Mexico, which is true and an entirely different thing.

This is how you prove what a political slut you are. If Trump was really what you say, you'd say the truth. But lies like this prove you are to be ignored. It actually defends Trump because you kill all your credibility and nothing you say is to be believed

Thanks for clearing this up, poor Donald was defamed by the MSM: See,

Donald Trump doubles down on calling Mexicans 'rapists' - CNN Video

Ooops

yes, how dare anyone quote him and factcheck him.

damn, trumpsers are such dolts. they prove every day why Donald only wins the uneducated angry white male demographic.

more lies.

trumpsters are as sociopathic as their orange bigoted misogynist fascist.

amazing what you'll say to advance white male supremacy.

Having to hate someone to disagree with them says more about you, and your insecurities than whatever you accuse them of.

 

[ClosedCaption]

You get called racist because of all the racist shit you say !

5 min in this place is all you need to get a good dose of deplorables.

FAIL

"This place" didn't block Obama. Congress did, and not very well at that.

They blocked Obama and vowed to do so before he was sworn in. Why do you think they did that? And why is your conclusion of why they did it better than someone elses who concludes they did it because he's black?

Your opinion means more than everyone elses?

Because he was a radical leftist.

Class dismissed

I said BEFORE HE TOOK OFFICE they vowed to do everything they can to make his a 1 term president. You say it was not because of his race. Prove it.

You cant. Class dismissed

 

[jillian]

actually lee Atwater said at the time he was going to run the southern strategy and he intentionally dog-whistled to racists. no, Reagan wasn't a racist.... but he set out to appeal to them. it seems silly at best, dishonest at worst, to deny the implication of where that campaign was kicked off.

the dog whistle was more about State's needed less of the DOJ telling them how to run elections. (and education and Medicaid and all that block grant stuff). It was a clear signal that guy's like Ed Meese would be vetting Judges, and O'Connor (who had a history of election law), Scalia and Bork were the first team.

Whether one thinks the fed govt should be involved in elections when the constitution reserves that power for the states is up to individuals, but that was the message and Reagan delivered.

the mechanics of elections are are the province of the state. but those mechanics have to exist within the federal constutional guarantees of equal protection.

Yes, and O'Connor's explanation of her view of equal protection in Bush v. Gore is a nightmare. LOL W was going to win even if the feds had stayed the hell out of it, as they should have done.

bush v gore is an irrelevancy... it's such a tortured, decision that the justices said it has no value as precedent in any other case.

A sad footnote on her legacy. Equal Protection is afforded to maj minority counties despite the min counties using less accurate polling mechanisms because of less funding that more affluent maj white counties.

But the basis of Reagan's southern strategy was telling WHITE southerners (and that's who is at the Neshoba County fair) that the feds were going to go away.

I believe in state's rights; I believe in people doing as much as they can for themselves at the community level and at the private level. And I believe that we've distorted the balance of our government today by giving powers that were never intended in the constitution to that federal establishment. And if I do get the job I'm looking for, I'm going to devote myself to trying to reorder those priorities and to restore to the states and local communities those functions which properly belong there.

I would argue that is NOT racist.

I don't believe Reagan was a racist. But I absolutely believe he used racists to advance his agenda. In case you haven't noticed, I am very Hamiltonian in my view of government. I think states' rights is subterfuge for "let us make black people go to separate schools and humiliate gays".

there is nothing I have seen from the so-called states' rights people to dissuade me of that.

But more than that, if we were supposed to have strong de-centralized states, we would still be living under the Articles of Confederation. We do not.... and for good reason.

 

[Wry Catcher]

Again the flat out lie that Trump called "mexicans rapists." He said rapists come across the border from Mexico, which is true and an entirely different thing.

This is how you prove what a political slut you are. If Trump was really what you say, you'd say the truth. But lies like this prove you are to be ignored. It actually defends Trump because you kill all your credibility and nothing you say is to be believed

Thanks for clearing this up, poor Donald was defamed by the MSM: See,

Donald Trump doubles down on calling Mexicans 'rapists' - CNN Video

Ooops

yes, how dare anyone quote him and factcheck him.

damn, trumpsers are such dolts. they prove every day why Donald only wins the uneducated angry white male demographic.

more lies.

trumpsters are as sociopathic as their orange bigoted misogynist fascist.

amazing what you'll say to advance white male supremacy.

Having to hate someone to disagree with them says more about you, and your insecurities than whatever you accuse them of.

Marty, you've devolved into posting word salad.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

You get called racist because of all the racist shit you say !

5 min in this place is all you need to get a good dose of deplorables.

FAIL

"This place" didn't block Obama. Congress did, and not very well at that.

They blocked Obama and vowed to do so before he was sworn in. Why do you think they did that? And why is your conclusion of why they did it better than someone elses who concludes they did it because he's black?

Your opinion means more than everyone elses?

Because he was a radical leftist.

Class dismissed

I said BEFORE HE TOOK OFFICE they vowed to do everything they can to make his a 1 term president. You say it was not because of his race. Prove it.

You cant. Class dismissed

I just proved it dimwit.

I'm guessing the loss of a black president is going to be devastating for race baiting faggots like you.

 

[martybegan]

Thanks for clearing this up, poor Donald was defamed by the MSM: See,

Donald Trump doubles down on calling Mexicans 'rapists' - CNN Video

Ooops

yes, how dare anyone quote him and factcheck him.

damn, trumpsers are such dolts. they prove every day why Donald only wins the uneducated angry white male demographic.

more lies.

trumpsters are as sociopathic as their orange bigoted misogynist fascist.

amazing what you'll say to advance white male supremacy.

Having to hate someone to disagree with them says more about you, and your insecurities than whatever you accuse them of.

Marty, you've devolved into posting word salad.

Well ain't we the dainty little white knight.

And of course your response is as inane and pointless as usual.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

Thanks for clearing this up, poor Donald was defamed by the MSM: See,

Donald Trump doubles down on calling Mexicans 'rapists' - CNN Video

Ooops

yes, how dare anyone quote him and factcheck him.

damn, trumpsers are such dolts. they prove every day why Donald only wins the uneducated angry white male demographic.

more lies.

trumpsters are as sociopathic as their orange bigoted misogynist fascist.

amazing what you'll say to advance white male supremacy.

Having to hate someone to disagree with them says more about you, and your insecurities than whatever you accuse them of.

Marty, you've devolved into posting word salad.

Says the dumbfuck who was posting about faggot sex earlier as if it was somehow relevant.

 

[hadit]

You get called racist because of all the racist shit you say !

5 min in this place is all you need to get a good dose of deplorables.

FAIL

"This place" didn't block Obama. Congress did, and not very well at that.

They blocked Obama and vowed to do so before he was sworn in. Why do you think they did that? And why is your conclusion of why they did it better than someone elses who concludes they did it because he's black?

Your opinion means more than everyone elses?

Because he was a radical leftist.

Class dismissed

I said BEFORE HE TOOK OFFICE they vowed to do everything they can to make his a 1 term president. You say it was not because of his race. Prove it.

You cant. Class dismissed

You don't prove a negative. PROVE that their opposition was race based. Fail and class really is dismissed. Here's a clue to start you out. They opposed Bubba and Jimmeh, neither of which was black.

 

[kaz]

Thanks for clearing this up, poor Donald was defamed by the MSM: See,

Donald Trump doubles down on calling Mexicans 'rapists' - CNN Video

Ooops

yes, how dare anyone quote him and factcheck him.

damn, trumpsers are such dolts. they prove every day why Donald only wins the uneducated angry white male demographic.

more lies.

trumpsters are as sociopathic as their orange bigoted misogynist fascist.

amazing what you'll say to advance white male supremacy.

Having to hate someone to disagree with them says more about you, and your insecurities than whatever you accuse them of.

Marty, you've devolved into posting word salad.

Infringing on your territory?

 

[namvet]

Thanks for clearing this up, poor Donald was defamed by the MSM: See,

Donald Trump doubles down on calling Mexicans 'rapists' - CNN Video

Ooops

yes, how dare anyone quote him and factcheck him.

damn, trumpsers are such dolts. they prove every day why Donald only wins the uneducated angry white male demographic.

more lies.

trumpsters are as sociopathic as their orange bigoted misogynist fascist.

amazing what you'll say to advance white male supremacy.

the voice of experience here

yes... you are.

Thanks for clearing this up, poor Donald was defamed by the MSM: See,

Donald Trump doubles down on calling Mexicans 'rapists' - CNN Video

Ooops

yes, how dare anyone quote him and factcheck him.

damn, trumpsers are such dolts. they prove every day why Donald only wins the uneducated angry white male demographic.

more lies.

trumpsters are as sociopathic as their orange bigoted misogynist fascist.

amazing what you'll say to advance white male supremacy.

the voice of experience here

yes... you are.

didn't you fuck a mod on here??

 

[ShaklesOfBigGov]

You get called racist because of all the racist shit you say !

5 min in this place is all you need to get a good dose of deplorables.

FAIL

"This place" didn't block Obama. Congress did, and not very well at that.

They blocked Obama and vowed to do so before he was sworn in. Why do you think they did that? And why is your conclusion of why they did it better than someone elses who concludes they did it because he's black?

Your opinion means more than everyone elses?

The Republicabs stood opposed to the liberal ideological view of how they wanted to shape America and the use of government to establish that, such as Obamacare. Democrats and the media used race as a means to accuse those who spoke up against those political views and efforts to encorporate a bigger form of government control through efforts such as Obamacare. The concept on the use of race hasn't really changed for Democrats, and it's always associated with some liberal issue they want to see passed, or when they are unable to make a convincing debate on an issue ... then it becames an issue of racism over the opponent's view they don't happen to approve of. They believe that by doing so they are more certain to get their way.

 

[ShaklesOfBigGov]

You get called racist because of all the racist shit you say !

5 min in this place is all you need to get a good dose of deplorables.

FAIL

"This place" didn't block Obama. Congress did, and not very well at that.

They blocked Obama and vowed to do so before he was sworn in. Why do you think they did that? And why is your conclusion of why they did it better than someone elses who concludes they did it because he's black?

Your opinion means more than everyone elses?

Because he was a radical leftist.

Class dismissed

I said BEFORE HE TOOK OFFICE they vowed to do everything they can to make his a 1 term president. You say it was not because of his race. Prove it.

You cant. Class dismissed

You don't prove a negative. PROVE that their opposition was race based. Fail and class really is dismissed. Here's a clue to start you out. They opposed Bubba and Jimmeh, neither of which was black.

Liberal Democrats love an opportunity to play the victim when they can't get Republicans (surprisingly) on board to support liberal ideas. They opposed Obama on a government healthcare system, they opposed even more gun regulations, opposed more spending on the same stimulus ideas that failed in doing much to boost our economy, stood against more spending on ongoing federal unemployment extensions (even after the stimulus) as opposed to actual jobs like the keystone pipeline, stood against the closing of Guantanamo Bay, opposed Obama's efforts to give terrorists rights of an attorney in CIVILIAN court over a military tribunal, criticized the president for butting in his opinion over Syria with his red-line threat before changing his mind, questioning his administration over a video protest when Benghazi was under a terror attack, felt Obama was being unfairly criticized when Republicans pushed an investigation into what actually happened in Benghazi (why an administration found it quicker to conclude blame was on a protest rather than an admitted terrorist attack), criticized his use of executive orders to set policies such as immigration,
... but let's make the claim that all this was done because he was black.

Do you see how when you look at each of the "issues" point by point, how the issue of race begins to crumble? Yet if you were to have those like Jillian, Closed Caption, and Rightwinger, discuss each "issue" in and of itself, and what the republicans had opposed with each of these liberal policies above, they can't help but make it about race when faced with an opposing view that just doesn't agree with theirs.

In fact, I would find it easier to take each issue point by point than they would in providing proof those efforts were was because he was black. Simply watch how each of them respond.

 

[hadit]

FAIL

"This place" didn't block Obama. Congress did, and not very well at that.

They blocked Obama and vowed to do so before he was sworn in. Why do you think they did that? And why is your conclusion of why they did it better than someone elses who concludes they did it because he's black?

Your opinion means more than everyone elses?

Because he was a radical leftist.

Class dismissed

I said BEFORE HE TOOK OFFICE they vowed to do everything they can to make his a 1 term president. You say it was not because of his race. Prove it.

You cant. Class dismissed

You don't prove a negative. PROVE that their opposition was race based. Fail and class really is dismissed. Here's a clue to start you out. They opposed Bubba and Jimmeh, neither of which was black.

Liberal Democrats love an opportunity to play the victim when they can't get Republicans (surprisingly) on board to support liberal ideas. They opposed Obama on a government healthcare system, they opposed even more gun regulations, opposed more spending on the same stimulus ideas that failed in doing much to boost our economy, stood against more spending on ongoing federal unemployment extensions (even after the stimulus) as opposed to actual jobs like the keystone pipeline, stood against the closing of Guantanamo Bay, opposed Obama's efforts to give terrorists rights of an attorney in CIVILIAN court over a military tribunal, criticized the president for butting in his opinion over Syria with his red-line threat before changing his mind, questioning his administration over a video protest when Benghazi was under a terror attack, felt Obama was being unfairly criticized when Republicans pushed an investigation into what actually happened in Benghazi (why an administration found it quicker to conclude blame was on a protest rather than an admitted terrorist attack), criticized his use of executive orders to set policies such as immigration,
... but let's make the claim that all this was done because he was black.

Do you see how when you look at each of the "issues" point by point, how the issue of race begins to crumble? Yet if you were to have those like Jillian, Closed Caption, and Rightwinger, discuss each "issue" in and of itself, and what the republicans had opposed with each of these liberal policies above, they can't help but make it about race when faced with an opposing view that just doesn't agree with theirs.

In fact, I would find it easier to take each issue point by point than they would in providing proof those efforts were was because he was black. Simply watch how each of them respond.

Yelling "racist" is the easy way out when you don't have a strong position on an issue. Unfortunately for liberals, however, it has been so ridiculously overused that it no longer has any power to end an argument. Of course there will always be racists around, in every portion of the political spectrum. Heck, there are racists in the BLM movement. If you look at the liberal prescriptions for "supporting" minorities, you'll find racism in the form of contempt, the underlying assumption that minorities are incapable of succeeding without white liberals helping them.