Only in Obama's ass backwards liberal world.
Obama Ag Secretary Vilsack Food Stamps Are A Stimulus - YouTube
three years ago 5.6 percent unemployment was to high but now 9.6 is the norm and is alright.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Only in Obama's ass backwards liberal world.
Obama Ag Secretary Vilsack Food Stamps Are A Stimulus - YouTube
Ask Nancy, and many other Libs. Food Stamps and Unemployment Checks are the single best way to create Jobs and stimulate the Economy.
With regard to aid to the unemployed, they were citing a document prepared for Congress by the CBO at the beginning of 2010 called "Policies for Increasing Economic Growth and Employment in 2010 and 2011."
HMM a question.Who said it was the "best" way?
Nancy Pelosi.
On Many occasions
It is the biggest bang for the buck when you do food stamps and unemployment insurance. The biggest bang for the buck, she said.
She makes the baseless and Insane claim that every dollar spent on them Comes back as 1.79 Dollars in GDP Growth.
Of course anyone with a brain knows that is horse shit, and if she were right we could spend 10 Trillion dollars and get 17.9 Trillion in GDP growth. Why would we ever stop spending lol. Pay everyone not to work, and give them all food stamps and the economy will boom.
The stat that truly makes return on dollars spent bogus is the horrendous amount of fraud that occurs in SNAP (Supplemental Nutritional Assistance Program). Every state has staggering amounts of fraud (that's just what they actually catch)- Also SNAP funding to Puerto Rico, American Samoa, and the Northern Marianas amounts to 0 dollars spent here.
It would be better to have welfare workers distributing food to the needy instead of food stamp cards. If you have a need get in a food distribution line. Currently almost every community have food banks. Lets use the money for SNAP to stock them with food- at least we could be better assured of actual food going to the truly needy.
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4t-eycEKXNs]Pelosi: Food Stamps & Unemployment Give Us The "Biggest Bang For The Buck" - YouTube[/ame]
according to nancy.... food stamps and welfare is the best stimulus there is.
Temporarily Increase Food Stamps 1.73
What part was wrong?
HMM a question.Nancy Pelosi.
On Many occasions
She makes the baseless and Insane claim that every dollar spent on them Comes back as 1.79 Dollars in GDP Growth.
Of course anyone with a brain knows that is horse shit, and if she were right we could spend 10 Trillion dollars and get 17.9 Trillion in GDP growth. Why would we ever stop spending lol. Pay everyone not to work, and give them all food stamps and the economy will boom.
The stat that truly makes return on dollars spent bogus is the horrendous amount of fraud that occurs in SNAP (Supplemental Nutritional Assistance Program). Every state has staggering amounts of fraud (that's just what they actually catch)- Also SNAP funding to Puerto Rico, American Samoa, and the Northern Marianas amounts to 0 dollars spent here.
It would be better to have welfare workers distributing food to the needy instead of food stamp cards. If you have a need get in a food distribution line. Currently almost every community have food banks. Lets use the money for SNAP to stock them with food- at least we could be better assured of actual food going to the truly needy.
Do our colony's err protectorates profits add into our GDP or anything?
What part was wrong?
The part that it creates jobs. Sure, on the blackboard it looks good and the simple theory holds up. However, it doesn't take into consideration the amount of uncertainty in the market.
While unemployment benefits and food stamps are a short term AD booster, hiring decisions are usually made with a longer time frame. Given the degree of uncertainty in the market, managers may be risk adverse to commit to hiring, even with the slight AD boost.
What part was wrong?
The part that it creates jobs. Sure, on the blackboard it looks good and the simple theory holds up. However, it doesn't take into consideration the amount of uncertainty in the market.
While unemployment benefits and food stamps are a short term AD booster, hiring decisions are usually made with a longer time frame. Given the degree of uncertainty in the market, managers may be risk adverse to commit to hiring, even with the slight AD boost.
What part was wrong?
The part that it creates jobs. Sure, on the blackboard it looks good and the simple theory holds up. However, it doesn't take into consideration the amount of uncertainty in the market.
While unemployment benefits and food stamps are a short term AD booster, hiring decisions are usually made with a longer time frame. Given the degree of uncertainty in the market, managers may be risk adverse to commit to hiring, even with the slight AD boost.
Not in the retail grocery market. Number of employees depends heavially on volume of sales. Same with food production, processing and distribution.
In industrial non food production you are correct.
All business models are not the same.
The part that it creates jobs. Sure, on the blackboard it looks good and the simple theory holds up. However, it doesn't take into consideration the amount of uncertainty in the market.
While unemployment benefits and food stamps are a short term AD booster, hiring decisions are usually made with a longer time frame. Given the degree of uncertainty in the market, managers may be risk adverse to commit to hiring, even with the slight AD boost.
Not in the retail grocery market. Number of employees depends heavially on volume of sales. Same with food production, processing and distribution.
In industrial non food production you are correct.
All business models are not the same.
It''s a false stimulation that cannot be sustained without increasing taxes. True stimulation for jobs comes from the private sector, not public subsidies!
The part that it creates jobs. Sure, on the blackboard it looks good and the simple theory holds up. However, it doesn't take into consideration the amount of uncertainty in the market.
While unemployment benefits and food stamps are a short term AD booster, hiring decisions are usually made with a longer time frame. Given the degree of uncertainty in the market, managers may be risk adverse to commit to hiring, even with the slight AD boost.
Not in the retail grocery market. Number of employees depends heavially on volume of sales. Same with food production, processing and distribution.
In industrial non food production you are correct.
All business models are not the same.
It''s a false stimulation that cannot be sustained without increasing taxes. True stimulation for jobs comes from the private sector, not public subsidies!
An 87% return on investment? There is not a single person in the nation that SHOULDN'T be on food stamps then... or Unemployment!Only in Obama's ass backwards liberal world.
Obama Ag Secretary Vilsack Food Stamps Are A Stimulus - YouTube
Ask Nancy, and many other Libs. Food Stamps and Unemployment Checks are the single best way to create Jobs and stimulate the Economy.
Not in the retail grocery market. Number of employees depends heavially on volume of sales. Same with food production, processing and distribution.
In industrial non food production you are correct.
All business models are not the same.
It''s a false stimulation that cannot be sustained without increasing taxes. True stimulation for jobs comes from the private sector, not public subsidies!
Yes the point I made earlier that we have been adding stimulus to our economy for decades with govt spending.
What part was wrong?
The part that it creates jobs. Sure, on the blackboard it looks good and the simple theory holds up. However, it doesn't take into consideration the amount of uncertainty in the market.
While unemployment benefits and food stamps are a short term AD booster, hiring decisions are usually made with a longer time frame. Given the degree of uncertainty in the market, managers may be risk adverse to commit to hiring, even with the slight AD boost.
Not in the retail grocery market. Number of employees depends heavially on volume of sales. Same with food production, processing and distribution.
In industrial non food production you are correct.
All business models are not the same.
Not in the retail grocery market. Number of employees depends heavially on volume of sales. Same with food production, processing and distribution.
In industrial non food production you are correct.
All business models are not the same.
It''s a false stimulation that cannot be sustained without increasing taxes. True stimulation for jobs comes from the private sector, not public subsidies!
Generally?
Well not in the way you may think.
Stimulation for "jobs" comes from the private sector when government makes huge purchases from private corporations.
Wrap your mind around that.
Food stamps Are Stimulas? [sic]
During a recession? Yes, if the additional expenditures are achieved through emergency financing.
I don't care who she sited, Claiming it is the best way to stimulate the economy and create Jobs is pure Horse shit.
Thoughtful analysis. If you've got a crayon handy, you should scrawl down your thoughts and send them over to the economists at the CBO. They could use that kind of fresh perspective.
These right wingers. And they call me idiot? They don't even know which end to wipe and which end to blot.