Flyer reveals Barack Obama headlined socialist event in 1996

[Truthmatters]

You cant touch the five million all your life though.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Flyer reveals Barack Obama headlined socialist event in 1996 - Spokane Conservative | Examiner.com

Told people he was born in Kenya

Eats Dogs

Socialist

Surrendered his Law license

Never was a Constitutional Law Professor

Obama taught constitutional law at the University of Chicago Law School for twelve years, as a Lecturer for four years (1992–1996), and as a Senior Lecturer for eight years (1996–2004).[62] During this time he taught courses in due process and equal protection, voting rights, and racism and law. He published no legal scholarship, and turned down tenured positions, but served eight years in the Illinois Senate during his twelve years at the university.[63]

And he didn't surrender his law license, he chose not to maintain it. If he needs it again, that won't be a problem.

snopes.com: Barack and Michelle Obama's Law Licenses

OOps.

 

[Truthmatters]

Yup. You flamming idiot Everybody but you is coldhearted.

answer my question.

who is going to pay for the ambulance?

The same people who paid for it before Obamacare.

The same people already pay for it. The difference is you want gov't to take away people's choices to own insurance or not. If I choose not to have insurance and I want to pay for my medical bills on my own, I should have that liberty. You want that liberty done away with.

Then you have to pay your share of the girls medical care.

how do we get your share?

 

[RDD_1210]

The same people who paid for it before Obamacare.

The same people already pay for it. The difference is you want gov't to take away people's choices to own insurance or not. If I choose not to have insurance and I want to pay for my medical bills on my own, I should have that liberty. You want that liberty done away with.

And when you make that choice and then can't pay...we have to pay for you. Your choice affects the rest of us. So you don't get to choose to burden us with higher expenses.

But gov't gets to choose to burden you with higher expenses? That's better?

Purchasing health insurance from a private company is being burdened by government with higher expenses? Ummm, you're doing that thing again where your arguments don't line up or make any sense.

 

[Truthmatters]

Told people he was born in Kenya

Eats Dogs

Socialist

Surrendered his Law license

Never was a Constitutional Law Professor

Obama taught constitutional law at the University of Chicago Law School for twelve years, as a Lecturer for four years (1992–1996), and as a Senior Lecturer for eight years (1996–2004).[62] During this time he taught courses in due process and equal protection, voting rights, and racism and law. He published no legal scholarship, and turned down tenured positions, but served eight years in the Illinois Senate during his twelve years at the university.[63]

And he didn't surrender his law license, he chose not to maintain it. If he needs it again, that won't be a problem.

snopes.com: Barack and Michelle Obama's Law Licenses

OOps.

good job CF , its always a class act to accept when you have made a mistake.

 

[Dr.Drock]

Yet you have no better ideas.

Not going through this song and dance again, far far better ideas have already been presented, you just don't like them. Disagreement is fine, at least you acknowledge who benefits the most from Obamacare.

You're right there have been far better ideas, such as a public option, but you didn't want to discuss that since that's not something that your Hero ever mentioned.

Who pays for the public option? Those using it or all americans?

Public option is again just something that helps private insurance companies. They no longer have to pay for high risk people, the burden gets dumped on the rest of americans whether they want insurance or not.

 

[J.E.D]

Wow, the stupid is thick in this thread.

 

[Dr.Drock]

And when you make that choice and then can't pay...we have to pay for you. Your choice affects the rest of us. So you don't get to choose to burden us with higher expenses.

But gov't gets to choose to burden you with higher expenses? That's better?

Purchasing health insurance from a private company is being burdened by government with higher expenses? Ummm, you're doing that thing again where your arguments don't line up or make any sense.

Yes, if you don't want insurance your cost of insurance goes from $0 to whatever your new insurance costs are. That's one way, and it'll go up for everyone. Just ask Mr. Gruber, the guy who used to pretend it'd lower costs.

How Obamacare Dramatically Increases the Cost of Insurance for Young Workers - Forbes

 

[Uncensored2008]

Funny stuff; a bunch of Democrats talk to socialists and that makes them socialists, lol. So if I talk to a conservative, does that all of a sudden make me a conservative? Or if I talk to gay person, does that all of a sudden make me gay? LMAO!!!! This is funny shit.

You giving the keynote for the GLAD gay pride festival DOES make some question your sexuality...

 

[Uncensored2008]

Why don't you tell us about just one 'Radical' policy that Obama has implemented.

Obama's fascist care springs to mind.

Of course SCOTUS will toss it prior to implementation.

 

[Uncensored2008]

LMAO!

Which part of obamacare is socialist? The part where he put more people on private insurance?

Define "private?"

Is the merger of governmental and corporate power structures "private" in your world? Funny, "looter" and "fascist" come to mind for me when I think of this.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Wow, the stupid is thick in this thread.

Well yeah, now that you are here....

 

[JohnA]

We tried to warn people of how radical Obama was..

And he is now trying to shove his radical "visions" on us..

he needs to go folks

Why don't you tell us about just one 'Radical' policy that Obama has implemented.

why dont you tell me just one POSITIVE policy that barrack husien obama has implemented

 

[Dr.Drock]

The biggest drivers of the increase, according to Gruber, are the new insurance regulations (especially the ones forcing upward a plan’s minimum actuarial value and mandating minimum essential benefits), and also the law’s insurance subsidies, which will incentivize “individuals [to choose] richer insurance with their tax credits.”

That is to say, Obamacare forces insurers to offer more benefits, requires them to spend more money on health expenses, and subsidizes the consumption of richer insurance packages. The laws of economics dictate that these costs will get passed down to consumers. It shouldn’t take a microsimulation from MIT to know there’s no such thing as a free lunch—but now you have one for good measure.

 

[BDBoop]

We tried to warn people of how radical Obama was..

And he is now trying to shove his radical "visions" on us..

he needs to go folks

Why don't you tell us about just one 'Radical' policy that Obama has implemented.

why dont you tell me just one POSITIVE policy that barrack husien obama has implemented

Sure, I can cut and paste twice.

Veterans Day checkup: What's Obama done for vets so far? | Boomer with Attitude | Creative Loafing Charlotte

This was from 2009, by the way.

• He announced a new VA budget of $112.8 billion, a 15.5-percent increase over the previous year. Among other things, the higher budget calls for hiring more staff, treating 122,000 more patients, and beginning the switch of patient records to an electronic system that can be accessed by all VA facilities. The increase will also pay for an uptick in education claims by veterans who are taking advantage of the Post-9/11 GI Bill, passed last year.

• The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act added another $1.4 billion to the VA budget, to be used toward improving services, including grant money to states to build extended care facilities for vets, and the hiring of 1,500 new claims processors to speed up delivery of benefits.

• The Joint Virtual Lifetime Electronic Initiative mandates that the DOD and VA work together to build a coordinated computer system that will provide accessible patient information from the day an individual enters military service throughout the rest of his/her life. This will remedy one of veterans' main complaints about the VA.

• In a related issue, the Obama administration is pushing for a measure that would let Congress approve VA money a year in advance, thus avoiding the delays for budget reasons that have plagued the agency.

• Just two weeks ago, the VA and DOD held a joint Mental Health Summit in Washington, designed to "harness the programs, resources and expertise of both departments to deal with the aftermath of the battlefield." The initiative will include removing the stigma many soldiers feel about admitting to PTSD symptoms, and, finally, treating PTSD and traumatic brain injuries more fully, rather than how it's been dealt with in the past, as something to be merely contained enough to keep it from causing major social (or political) problems.

• With more than 100,000 veterans going homeless on any given night, Obama proposes pilot programs with non-profits to specifically target vets' homelessness and its related problems. A more concrete plan is expected within a few months.

This list still leaves much to do, but it's nevertheless a good start by the Prez to follow through on promises he made to vets. So on Veterans Day, when the country is full of hurrahs and heart-tugging nods toward the flag, remember that we still need to do a lot more to meet our commitment to vets. You can thank vets in a way that could make an actual difference: Contact the White House and your representative or U.S. senators in Congress, and tell them to do more for veterans, including improving the care given at VA hospitals. Don't just support our soldiers when they're overseas; make sure they're not having to fight battles with government bureaucracy when they come home.

 

[Truthmatters]

But gov't gets to choose to burden you with higher expenses? That's better?

Purchasing health insurance from a private company is being burdened by government with higher expenses? Ummm, you're doing that thing again where your arguments don't line up or make any sense.

Yes, if you don't want insurance your cost of insurance goes from $0 to whatever your new insurance costs are. That's one way, and it'll go up for everyone. Just ask Mr. Gruber, the guy who used to pretend it'd lower costs.

How Obamacare Dramatically Increases the Cost of Insurance for Young Workers - Forbes

the young and healthy op out all together today.

didnt you know that?


This makes them pay so all the rest are not paying for them too

 

[BDBoop]

Not to mention - no really. Don't mention it.

 

[Dr.Drock]

Purchasing health insurance from a private company is being burdened by government with higher expenses? Ummm, you're doing that thing again where your arguments don't line up or make any sense.

Yes, if you don't want insurance your cost of insurance goes from $0 to whatever your new insurance costs are. That's one way, and it'll go up for everyone. Just ask Mr. Gruber, the guy who used to pretend it'd lower costs.

How Obamacare Dramatically Increases the Cost of Insurance for Young Workers - Forbes

the young and healthy op out all together today.

didnt you know that?


This makes them pay so all the rest are not paying for them too

Yes, makes them pay, fascism or socialism, certainly isn't a pro-liberty or capitalistic stance.

It forces low cost insurance consumers (young people) to pay high insurance costs. Great idea during a recession where college grads can't find work and have student loan bills.

 

[Truthmatters]

why should they get benifit without paying?

 

[Truthmatters]

If everyone gets treated no matter what then everyone needs to pay right?