Flight 93 crash fantasy

[DiveCon]

so you claim the FBI lied

Yes, unless you can show some good proof that 95% was really recovered there. Shouldn't be too hard if that amount was really recovered. Christ, it's practically a whole 757. How hard can it be to prove?!

and CNN is in on it

No dimwit. They just report what the FBI spokespeople tell them.

sorry dipshit, i dont have access to that, and neither would anyone else on this forum
and you are saying they lied, you need some proof , dont you?
what proof do you have
we've all seen the photos of the proof they DID get it
you want to deny the facts and replace it with your paranoid delusions

 

[saiweril]

we've all seen the photos of the proof they DID get it

Photos proving 95% was recovered? Where?!?

 

[candycorn]

we've all seen the photos of the proof they DID get it

Photos proving 95% was recovered? Where?!?

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6EEyk-iohLw"]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6EEyk-iohLw[/ame]

On second thought, you're pretty hilarious. Keep up the good work.

 

[saiweril]

Sorry for the smack-down candycorn. I'll try to go easier on you guys from now on. I know it's not easy supporting an official story that's full of holes.

 

[DiveCon]

Sorry for the smack-down candycorn. I'll try to go easier on you guys from now on. I know it's not easy supporting an official story that's full of holes.

yet you have no story at all

 

[SFC Ollie]

If this imbecile wasn't so funny I'd put him on ignore.....

 

[PhysicsExist]

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kkqgs68A6a8&feature=player_embedded[/ame]

 

[DiveCon]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kkqgs68A6a8&feature=player_embedded

thanks, retard, its nice knowing i can occupy space in your cranial cavity free of charge, and in such a short span of time

 

[PhysicsExist]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kkqgs68A6a8&feature=player_embedded

thanks, retard, its nice knowing i can occupy space in your cranial cavity free of charge, and in such a short span of time

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kkqgs68A6a8&feature=player_embedded[/ame]

 

[DiveCon]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kkqgs68A6a8&feature=player_embedded

thanks, retard, its nice knowing i can occupy space in your cranial cavity free of charge, and in such a short span of time

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kkqgs68A6a8&feature=player_embedded[/ame]

dipshit, you understand that id-eots just retitled that video he found on youtube, right?
or are you pathetically THAT stupid to think that is actually me in that video?

 

[PhysicsExist]

thanks, retard, its nice knowing i can occupy space in your cranial cavity free of charge, and in such a short span of time

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kkqgs68A6a8&feature=player_embedded[/ame]

dipshit, you understand that id-eots just retitled that video he found on youtube, right?
or are you pathetically THAT stupid to think that is actually me in that video?

1) Building 7 came down in a sudden collapse, across the full length of the building, for full freefall acceleration for 105 feet, or 8 floors.

2) The freefall for 2.25 seconds is impossible because in a natural collapse a building would need its columns to buckle/fail

3) When columns buckle/fail, there is a MINIMUM resistance, its asymptotic (it never gives a zero) thus meaning this is IMPOSSIBLE for freefall to occur.

 

[DiveCon]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kkqgs68A6a8&feature=player_embedded

dipshit, you understand that id-eots just retitled that video he found on youtube, right?
or are you pathetically THAT stupid to think that is actually me in that video?

1) Building 7 came down in a sudden collapse, across the full length of the building, for full freefall acceleration for 105 feet, or 8 floors.

2) The freefall for 2.25 seconds is impossible because in a natural collapse a building would need its columns to buckle/fail

3) When columns buckle/fail, there is a MINIMUM resistance, its asymptotic (it never gives a zero) thus meaning this is IMPOSSIBLE for freefall to occur.

WRONG

again

 

[Rat in the Hat]

dipshit, you understand that id-eots just retitled that video he found on youtube, right?
or are you pathetically THAT stupid to think that is actually me in that video?

1) Building 7 came down in a sudden collapse, across the full length of the building, for full freefall acceleration for 105 feet, or 8 floors.

2) The freefall for 2.25 seconds is impossible because in a natural collapse a building would need its columns to buckle/fail

3) When columns buckle/fail, there is a MINIMUM resistance, its asymptotic (it never gives a zero) thus meaning this is IMPOSSIBLE for freefall to occur.

WRONG

again

Why do you say again? Was he ever right?

 

[DiveCon]

1) Building 7 came down in a sudden collapse, across the full length of the building, for full freefall acceleration for 105 feet, or 8 floors.

2) The freefall for 2.25 seconds is impossible because in a natural collapse a building would need its columns to buckle/fail

3) When columns buckle/fail, there is a MINIMUM resistance, its asymptotic (it never gives a zero) thus meaning this is IMPOSSIBLE for freefall to occur.

WRONG

again

Why do you say again? Was he ever right?

again, as in still
saying "wrong again" in no way implies he has ever been right
i hope that clears it up

 

[Rat in the Hat]

WRONG

again

Why do you say again? Was he ever right?

again, as in still
saying "wrong again" in no way implies he has ever been right
i hope that clears it up

My mistake.

You're saying again as meaning repetitively. I thought you meant again as meaning an entirely new episode of idiocy.

Sorry to have misunderstood you.

 

[PhysicsExist]

1) Building 7 came down in a sudden collapse, across the full length of the building, for full freefall acceleration for 105 feet, or 8 floors.

2) The freefall for 2.25 seconds is impossible because in a natural collapse a building would need its columns to buckle/fail

3) When columns buckle/fail, there is a MINIMUM resistance, its asymptotic (it never gives a zero) thus meaning this is IMPOSSIBLE for freefall to occur.

Anyone?

 

[candycorn]

1) Building 7 came down in a sudden collapse, across the full length of the building, for full freefall acceleration for 105 feet, or 8 floors.

2) The freefall for 2.25 seconds is impossible because in a natural collapse a building would need its columns to buckle/fail

3) When columns buckle/fail, there is a MINIMUM resistance, its asymptotic (it never gives a zero) thus meaning this is IMPOSSIBLE for freefall to occur.

Anyone?

Nobody cares, CD. You've been exposed (now on this forum as well) as a fraud.

 

[Rat in the Hat]

1) Building 7 came down in a sudden collapse, across the full length of the building, for full freefall acceleration for 105 feet, or 8 floors.

2) The freefall for 2.25 seconds is impossible because in a natural collapse a building would need its columns to buckle/fail

3) When columns buckle/fail, there is a MINIMUM resistance, its asymptotic (it never gives a zero) thus meaning this is IMPOSSIBLE for freefall to occur.

Anyone?

Anyone what? Are you asking if anyone will come to your defense and agree with you?

It didn't work in the concrete core thread, why would you think it would work here, Chris?

 

[eots]

1) Building 7 came down in a sudden collapse, across the full length of the building, for full freefall acceleration for 105 feet, or 8 floors.

2) The freefall for 2.25 seconds is impossible because in a natural collapse a building would need its columns to buckle/fail

3) When columns buckle/fail, there is a MINIMUM resistance, its asymptotic (it never gives a zero) thus meaning this is IMPOSSIBLE for freefall to occur.

Anyone?

Anyone what? Are you asking if anyone will come to your defense and agree with you?

It didn't work in the concrete core thread, why would you think it would work here, Chris?

Chris ? concrete core ? wtf are you on boy ?

 

[eots]

1) Building 7 came down in a sudden collapse, across the full length of the building, for full freefall acceleration for 105 feet, or 8 floors.

2) The freefall for 2.25 seconds is impossible because in a natural collapse a building would need its columns to buckle/fail

3) When columns buckle/fail, there is a MINIMUM resistance, its asymptotic (it never gives a zero) thus meaning this is IMPOSSIBLE for freefall to occur.

Anyone?

Nobody cares, CD. You've been exposed (now on this forum as well) as a fraud.

You have been exposed as someone who is paid to post so shut the Fuck up