FISA Court Neck Deep In Surveillance On Trump Campaign,

The Purge

Platinum Member
Aug 16, 2018
17,881
7,856
400
The Federalist Papers ^ | 12/26/2019

FISA Court Neck Deep In Surveillance On Trump Campaign, Knew Of Application Issues, Report Carmine Sabia By Carmine Sabia Published December 26, 2019 at 9:49am

The Deep State is a real thing, and with each new report or finding we discover that it is deeper than any of us have imagined.

In the most recent case, it appears that the FISA courts were aware that the applications to spy on Carter Page, an aide with President Donald Trump’s campaign.

After the report of Inspector General Michael Horowitz, the head of the FISA courts, Judge Rosemary Collyer, ripped into the FBI for what it did.

“The FBI’s handling of the Carter Page applications, as portrayed in the [Office of the inspector general] report, was antithetical to the heightened duty of candor described above.

“The frequency with which representations made by FBI personnel turned out to be unsupported or contradicted by information in their possession, and with which they withheld information detrimental to their case, calls into question whether information contained in other FBI applications is reliable,” the judge said. Read More

But that could have just been a smokescreen to avoid getting heat on herself and the courts as it has now been found that the courts were notified of the issues with the applications beginning in 2016.

NSA Director Admiral Mike Rogers made it known to the court that there were issues with the way the NSA was complying with minimization procedure.

That occurred on, October 24, 2016, notable as it was a mere three days that the FISA court approved a warrant to spy on Page, The Epoch Times reported.

“On October 24, 2016, the government orally apprised the Court of significant non-compliance with the NSA’s minimization procedures involving queries of data acquired under Section 702 using U.S. person identifiers. The full scope of non-compliant querying practices had not been previously disclosed to the Court,” it said. Is the Deep State against Trump? Yes No Completing this poll entitles you to our news updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

“Two days later, on the day the Court otherwise would have had to complete its review of the certifications and procedures, the government made a written submission regarding those compliance problems … and the Court held a hearing to address them,” it said.

“The government reported that the NSA IG and OCO were conducting other reviews covering different time periods, with preliminary results suggesting that the problem was widespread during all periods under review,” it said.

The FISA court was unaware of the FISA “query” violations until they were presented to the court by then-NSA Director Rogers.

The NSD and FBI knew Rogers was conducting his own compliance review. Rogers knew the NSD was finalizing its 2016 certification. The NSD was aware that its 2016 certification lacked material and legally required disclosure.

The NSD carries the “responsibility of overseeing the foreign intelligence, counterintelligence and other national security activities of the United States Intelligence Community.” Duties include “representing the government before the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC).”

Additionally, the Operations Section of the NSD is “responsible for preparing and filing all applications for Court orders pursuant to FISA.” The original Page FISA application, along with the three subsequent renewals, carried a signature page from a DOJ attorney, whose name was redacted, but is almost certainly associated with the NSD.

The Deep State runs deep and it makes one wonder if this entire scheme had the involvement of the courts too.

-------------

The Chief Justice has not moved to reform the FISA court, for which he is personally and totally responsible. This alone precludes him from sitting at the Trump impeachment in the Senate. He is a fact witness to the corruption the Senate case must investigate.
 
All Trump ever had to do to win his next election was to let leftists go off the rails. The mask slipped off and berserking psychos were revealed.

It was too easy. Important, but a waste of talent for a 4D chess master.
 
Just as soon as Trump is sworn in to his second term the dems corruption is going to come out...and the elected dems and the filthy lying media will not be able to stop it....Trump will come at em with both barrels....
 
The Federalist Papers ^ | 12/26/2019

FISA Court Neck Deep In Surveillance On Trump Campaign, Knew Of Application Issues, Report Carmine Sabia By Carmine Sabia Published December 26, 2019 at 9:49am

The Deep State is a real thing, and with each new report or finding we discover that it is deeper than any of us have imagined.

In the most recent case, it appears that the FISA courts were aware that the applications to spy on Carter Page, an aide with President Donald Trump’s campaign.

After the report of Inspector General Michael Horowitz, the head of the FISA courts, Judge Rosemary Collyer, ripped into the FBI for what it did.

“The FBI’s handling of the Carter Page applications, as portrayed in the [Office of the inspector general] report, was antithetical to the heightened duty of candor described above.

“The frequency with which representations made by FBI personnel turned out to be unsupported or contradicted by information in their possession, and with which they withheld information detrimental to their case, calls into question whether information contained in other FBI applications is reliable,” the judge said. Read More

But that could have just been a smokescreen to avoid getting heat on herself and the courts as it has now been found that the courts were notified of the issues with the applications beginning in 2016.

NSA Director Admiral Mike Rogers made it known to the court that there were issues with the way the NSA was complying with minimization procedure.

That occurred on, October 24, 2016, notable as it was a mere three days that the FISA court approved a warrant to spy on Page, The Epoch Times reported.

“On October 24, 2016, the government orally apprised the Court of significant non-compliance with the NSA’s minimization procedures involving queries of data acquired under Section 702 using U.S. person identifiers. The full scope of non-compliant querying practices had not been previously disclosed to the Court,” it said. Is the Deep State against Trump? Yes No Completing this poll entitles you to our news updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

“Two days later, on the day the Court otherwise would have had to complete its review of the certifications and procedures, the government made a written submission regarding those compliance problems … and the Court held a hearing to address them,” it said.

“The government reported that the NSA IG and OCO were conducting other reviews covering different time periods, with preliminary results suggesting that the problem was widespread during all periods under review,” it said.

The FISA court was unaware of the FISA “query” violations until they were presented to the court by then-NSA Director Rogers.

The NSD and FBI knew Rogers was conducting his own compliance review. Rogers knew the NSD was finalizing its 2016 certification. The NSD was aware that its 2016 certification lacked material and legally required disclosure.

The NSD carries the “responsibility of overseeing the foreign intelligence, counterintelligence and other national security activities of the United States Intelligence Community.” Duties include “representing the government before the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC).”

Additionally, the Operations Section of the NSD is “responsible for preparing and filing all applications for Court orders pursuant to FISA.” The original Page FISA application, along with the three subsequent renewals, carried a signature page from a DOJ attorney, whose name was redacted, but is almost certainly associated with the NSD.

The Deep State runs deep and it makes one wonder if this entire scheme had the involvement of the courts too.

-------------

The Chief Justice has not moved to reform the FISA court, for which he is personally and totally responsible. This alone precludes him from sitting at the Trump impeachment in the Senate. He is a fact witness to the corruption the Senate case must investigate.
Declassification any day now....any day now....any day now....:71:...any day now....any day now...
 
The Federalist Papers ^ | 12/26/2019

FISA Court Neck Deep In Surveillance On Trump Campaign, Knew Of Application Issues, Report Carmine Sabia By Carmine Sabia Published December 26, 2019 at 9:49am

The Deep State is a real thing, and with each new report or finding we discover that it is deeper than any of us have imagined.

In the most recent case, it appears that the FISA courts were aware that the applications to spy on Carter Page, an aide with President Donald Trump’s campaign.

After the report of Inspector General Michael Horowitz, the head of the FISA courts, Judge Rosemary Collyer, ripped into the FBI for what it did.

“The FBI’s handling of the Carter Page applications, as portrayed in the [Office of the inspector general] report, was antithetical to the heightened duty of candor described above.

“The frequency with which representations made by FBI personnel turned out to be unsupported or contradicted by information in their possession, and with which they withheld information detrimental to their case, calls into question whether information contained in other FBI applications is reliable,” the judge said. Read More

But that could have just been a smokescreen to avoid getting heat on herself and the courts as it has now been found that the courts were notified of the issues with the applications beginning in 2016.

NSA Director Admiral Mike Rogers made it known to the court that there were issues with the way the NSA was complying with minimization procedure.

That occurred on, October 24, 2016, notable as it was a mere three days that the FISA court approved a warrant to spy on Page, The Epoch Times reported.

“On October 24, 2016, the government orally apprised the Court of significant non-compliance with the NSA’s minimization procedures involving queries of data acquired under Section 702 using U.S. person identifiers. The full scope of non-compliant querying practices had not been previously disclosed to the Court,” it said. Is the Deep State against Trump? Yes No Completing this poll entitles you to our news updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

“Two days later, on the day the Court otherwise would have had to complete its review of the certifications and procedures, the government made a written submission regarding those compliance problems … and the Court held a hearing to address them,” it said.

“The government reported that the NSA IG and OCO were conducting other reviews covering different time periods, with preliminary results suggesting that the problem was widespread during all periods under review,” it said.

The FISA court was unaware of the FISA “query” violations until they were presented to the court by then-NSA Director Rogers.

The NSD and FBI knew Rogers was conducting his own compliance review. Rogers knew the NSD was finalizing its 2016 certification. The NSD was aware that its 2016 certification lacked material and legally required disclosure.

The NSD carries the “responsibility of overseeing the foreign intelligence, counterintelligence and other national security activities of the United States Intelligence Community.” Duties include “representing the government before the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC).”

Additionally, the Operations Section of the NSD is “responsible for preparing and filing all applications for Court orders pursuant to FISA.” The original Page FISA application, along with the three subsequent renewals, carried a signature page from a DOJ attorney, whose name was redacted, but is almost certainly associated with the NSD.

The Deep State runs deep and it makes one wonder if this entire scheme had the involvement of the courts too.

-------------

The Chief Justice has not moved to reform the FISA court, for which he is personally and totally responsible. This alone precludes him from sitting at the Trump impeachment in the Senate. He is a fact witness to the corruption the Senate case must investigate.
Declassification any day now....any day now....any day now....:71:...any day now....any day now...
Mueller report going to be devastating...devastating, devastating, devastating....lolololol!!
 
The Federalist Papers ^ | 12/26/2019

FISA Court Neck Deep In Surveillance On Trump Campaign, Knew Of Application Issues, Report Carmine Sabia By Carmine Sabia Published December 26, 2019 at 9:49am

The Deep State is a real thing, and with each new report or finding we discover that it is deeper than any of us have imagined.

In the most recent case, it appears that the FISA courts were aware that the applications to spy on Carter Page, an aide with President Donald Trump’s campaign.

After the report of Inspector General Michael Horowitz, the head of the FISA courts, Judge Rosemary Collyer, ripped into the FBI for what it did.

“The FBI’s handling of the Carter Page applications, as portrayed in the [Office of the inspector general] report, was antithetical to the heightened duty of candor described above.

“The frequency with which representations made by FBI personnel turned out to be unsupported or contradicted by information in their possession, and with which they withheld information detrimental to their case, calls into question whether information contained in other FBI applications is reliable,” the judge said. Read More

But that could have just been a smokescreen to avoid getting heat on herself and the courts as it has now been found that the courts were notified of the issues with the applications beginning in 2016.

NSA Director Admiral Mike Rogers made it known to the court that there were issues with the way the NSA was complying with minimization procedure.

That occurred on, October 24, 2016, notable as it was a mere three days that the FISA court approved a warrant to spy on Page, The Epoch Times reported.

“On October 24, 2016, the government orally apprised the Court of significant non-compliance with the NSA’s minimization procedures involving queries of data acquired under Section 702 using U.S. person identifiers. The full scope of non-compliant querying practices had not been previously disclosed to the Court,” it said. Is the Deep State against Trump? Yes No Completing this poll entitles you to our news updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

“Two days later, on the day the Court otherwise would have had to complete its review of the certifications and procedures, the government made a written submission regarding those compliance problems … and the Court held a hearing to address them,” it said.

“The government reported that the NSA IG and OCO were conducting other reviews covering different time periods, with preliminary results suggesting that the problem was widespread during all periods under review,” it said.

The FISA court was unaware of the FISA “query” violations until they were presented to the court by then-NSA Director Rogers.

The NSD and FBI knew Rogers was conducting his own compliance review. Rogers knew the NSD was finalizing its 2016 certification. The NSD was aware that its 2016 certification lacked material and legally required disclosure.

The NSD carries the “responsibility of overseeing the foreign intelligence, counterintelligence and other national security activities of the United States Intelligence Community.” Duties include “representing the government before the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC).”

Additionally, the Operations Section of the NSD is “responsible for preparing and filing all applications for Court orders pursuant to FISA.” The original Page FISA application, along with the three subsequent renewals, carried a signature page from a DOJ attorney, whose name was redacted, but is almost certainly associated with the NSD.

The Deep State runs deep and it makes one wonder if this entire scheme had the involvement of the courts too.

-------------

The Chief Justice has not moved to reform the FISA court, for which he is personally and totally responsible. This alone precludes him from sitting at the Trump impeachment in the Senate. He is a fact witness to the corruption the Senate case must investigate.
Declassification any day now....any day now....any day now....:71:...any day now....any day now...



The someone in the FBI lied and falsified documents in order to spy on Carter Page for over a year.... in order to spy on Trump. Whoever gave the order to do that should go to prison and you should be happy about it if your an American.
 
The Federalist Papers ^ | 12/26/2019

FISA Court Neck Deep In Surveillance On Trump Campaign, Knew Of Application Issues, Report Carmine Sabia By Carmine Sabia Published December 26, 2019 at 9:49am

The Deep State is a real thing, and with each new report or finding we discover that it is deeper than any of us have imagined.

In the most recent case, it appears that the FISA courts were aware that the applications to spy on Carter Page, an aide with President Donald Trump’s campaign.

After the report of Inspector General Michael Horowitz, the head of the FISA courts, Judge Rosemary Collyer, ripped into the FBI for what it did.

“The FBI’s handling of the Carter Page applications, as portrayed in the [Office of the inspector general] report, was antithetical to the heightened duty of candor described above.

“The frequency with which representations made by FBI personnel turned out to be unsupported or contradicted by information in their possession, and with which they withheld information detrimental to their case, calls into question whether information contained in other FBI applications is reliable,” the judge said. Read More

But that could have just been a smokescreen to avoid getting heat on herself and the courts as it has now been found that the courts were notified of the issues with the applications beginning in 2016.

NSA Director Admiral Mike Rogers made it known to the court that there were issues with the way the NSA was complying with minimization procedure.

That occurred on, October 24, 2016, notable as it was a mere three days that the FISA court approved a warrant to spy on Page, The Epoch Times reported.

“On October 24, 2016, the government orally apprised the Court of significant non-compliance with the NSA’s minimization procedures involving queries of data acquired under Section 702 using U.S. person identifiers. The full scope of non-compliant querying practices had not been previously disclosed to the Court,” it said. Is the Deep State against Trump? Yes No Completing this poll entitles you to our news updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

“Two days later, on the day the Court otherwise would have had to complete its review of the certifications and procedures, the government made a written submission regarding those compliance problems … and the Court held a hearing to address them,” it said.

“The government reported that the NSA IG and OCO were conducting other reviews covering different time periods, with preliminary results suggesting that the problem was widespread during all periods under review,” it said.

The FISA court was unaware of the FISA “query” violations until they were presented to the court by then-NSA Director Rogers.

The NSD and FBI knew Rogers was conducting his own compliance review. Rogers knew the NSD was finalizing its 2016 certification. The NSD was aware that its 2016 certification lacked material and legally required disclosure.

The NSD carries the “responsibility of overseeing the foreign intelligence, counterintelligence and other national security activities of the United States Intelligence Community.” Duties include “representing the government before the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC).”

Additionally, the Operations Section of the NSD is “responsible for preparing and filing all applications for Court orders pursuant to FISA.” The original Page FISA application, along with the three subsequent renewals, carried a signature page from a DOJ attorney, whose name was redacted, but is almost certainly associated with the NSD.

The Deep State runs deep and it makes one wonder if this entire scheme had the involvement of the courts too.

-------------

The Chief Justice has not moved to reform the FISA court, for which he is personally and totally responsible. This alone precludes him from sitting at the Trump impeachment in the Senate. He is a fact witness to the corruption the Senate case must investigate.
Declassification any day now....any day now....any day now....:71:...any day now....any day now...



The someone in the FBI lied and falsified documents in order to spy on Carter Page for over a year.... in order to spy on Trump.

How do you spy on Trump by wiretapping a low level advisor who left the campaign a month ago and went straight to Moscow?
 
The Federalist Papers ^ | 12/26/2019
In the most recent case, it appears that the FISA courts were aware that the applications to spy on Carter Page, an aide with President Donald Trump’s campaign.

Is that English?

I've got English right here:

Trump campaign communications director Jason Miller said of Page, "He’s never been a part of our campaign. Period."

Trump camp backs away from adviser suspected of Kremlin ties
Yes but the sentence structure is lacking.
 
The Federalist Papers ^ | 12/26/2019

FISA Court Neck Deep In Surveillance On Trump Campaign, Knew Of Application Issues, Report Carmine Sabia By Carmine Sabia Published December 26, 2019 at 9:49am

The Deep State is a real thing, and with each new report or finding we discover that it is deeper than any of us have imagined.

In the most recent case, it appears that the FISA courts were aware that the applications to spy on Carter Page, an aide with President Donald Trump’s campaign.

After the report of Inspector General Michael Horowitz, the head of the FISA courts, Judge Rosemary Collyer, ripped into the FBI for what it did.

“The FBI’s handling of the Carter Page applications, as portrayed in the [Office of the inspector general] report, was antithetical to the heightened duty of candor described above.

“The frequency with which representations made by FBI personnel turned out to be unsupported or contradicted by information in their possession, and with which they withheld information detrimental to their case, calls into question whether information contained in other FBI applications is reliable,” the judge said. Read More

But that could have just been a smokescreen to avoid getting heat on herself and the courts as it has now been found that the courts were notified of the issues with the applications beginning in 2016.

NSA Director Admiral Mike Rogers made it known to the court that there were issues with the way the NSA was complying with minimization procedure.

That occurred on, October 24, 2016, notable as it was a mere three days that the FISA court approved a warrant to spy on Page, The Epoch Times reported.

“On October 24, 2016, the government orally apprised the Court of significant non-compliance with the NSA’s minimization procedures involving queries of data acquired under Section 702 using U.S. person identifiers. The full scope of non-compliant querying practices had not been previously disclosed to the Court,” it said. Is the Deep State against Trump? Yes No Completing this poll entitles you to our news updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

“Two days later, on the day the Court otherwise would have had to complete its review of the certifications and procedures, the government made a written submission regarding those compliance problems … and the Court held a hearing to address them,” it said.

“The government reported that the NSA IG and OCO were conducting other reviews covering different time periods, with preliminary results suggesting that the problem was widespread during all periods under review,” it said.

The FISA court was unaware of the FISA “query” violations until they were presented to the court by then-NSA Director Rogers.

The NSD and FBI knew Rogers was conducting his own compliance review. Rogers knew the NSD was finalizing its 2016 certification. The NSD was aware that its 2016 certification lacked material and legally required disclosure.

The NSD carries the “responsibility of overseeing the foreign intelligence, counterintelligence and other national security activities of the United States Intelligence Community.” Duties include “representing the government before the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC).”

Additionally, the Operations Section of the NSD is “responsible for preparing and filing all applications for Court orders pursuant to FISA.” The original Page FISA application, along with the three subsequent renewals, carried a signature page from a DOJ attorney, whose name was redacted, but is almost certainly associated with the NSD.

The Deep State runs deep and it makes one wonder if this entire scheme had the involvement of the courts too.

-------------

The Chief Justice has not moved to reform the FISA court, for which he is personally and totally responsible. This alone precludes him from sitting at the Trump impeachment in the Senate. He is a fact witness to the corruption the Senate case must investigate.
Declassification any day now....any day now....any day now....:71:...any day now....any day now...



The someone in the FBI lied and falsified documents in order to spy on Carter Page for over a year.... in order to spy on Trump.

How do you spy on Trump by wiretapping a low level advisor who left the campaign a month ago and went straight to Moscow?


Why does the FBI falsify information on Carter Page, information coming from the CIA that was exculpatory for Page..... , if he's just a low level advisor? Answer is, they were looking for more, wherever they could look, to pin something on Trump and were willing then, and still are willing to break rules along the way to do it.
 
The Federalist Papers ^ | 12/26/2019

FISA Court Neck Deep In Surveillance On Trump Campaign, Knew Of Application Issues, Report Carmine Sabia By Carmine Sabia Published December 26, 2019 at 9:49am

The Deep State is a real thing, and with each new report or finding we discover that it is deeper than any of us have imagined.

In the most recent case, it appears that the FISA courts were aware that the applications to spy on Carter Page, an aide with President Donald Trump’s campaign.

After the report of Inspector General Michael Horowitz, the head of the FISA courts, Judge Rosemary Collyer, ripped into the FBI for what it did.

“The FBI’s handling of the Carter Page applications, as portrayed in the [Office of the inspector general] report, was antithetical to the heightened duty of candor described above.

“The frequency with which representations made by FBI personnel turned out to be unsupported or contradicted by information in their possession, and with which they withheld information detrimental to their case, calls into question whether information contained in other FBI applications is reliable,” the judge said. Read More

But that could have just been a smokescreen to avoid getting heat on herself and the courts as it has now been found that the courts were notified of the issues with the applications beginning in 2016.

NSA Director Admiral Mike Rogers made it known to the court that there were issues with the way the NSA was complying with minimization procedure.

That occurred on, October 24, 2016, notable as it was a mere three days that the FISA court approved a warrant to spy on Page, The Epoch Times reported.

“On October 24, 2016, the government orally apprised the Court of significant non-compliance with the NSA’s minimization procedures involving queries of data acquired under Section 702 using U.S. person identifiers. The full scope of non-compliant querying practices had not been previously disclosed to the Court,” it said. Is the Deep State against Trump? Yes No Completing this poll entitles you to our news updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

“Two days later, on the day the Court otherwise would have had to complete its review of the certifications and procedures, the government made a written submission regarding those compliance problems … and the Court held a hearing to address them,” it said.

“The government reported that the NSA IG and OCO were conducting other reviews covering different time periods, with preliminary results suggesting that the problem was widespread during all periods under review,” it said.

The FISA court was unaware of the FISA “query” violations until they were presented to the court by then-NSA Director Rogers.

The NSD and FBI knew Rogers was conducting his own compliance review. Rogers knew the NSD was finalizing its 2016 certification. The NSD was aware that its 2016 certification lacked material and legally required disclosure.

The NSD carries the “responsibility of overseeing the foreign intelligence, counterintelligence and other national security activities of the United States Intelligence Community.” Duties include “representing the government before the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC).”

Additionally, the Operations Section of the NSD is “responsible for preparing and filing all applications for Court orders pursuant to FISA.” The original Page FISA application, along with the three subsequent renewals, carried a signature page from a DOJ attorney, whose name was redacted, but is almost certainly associated with the NSD.

The Deep State runs deep and it makes one wonder if this entire scheme had the involvement of the courts too.

-------------

The Chief Justice has not moved to reform the FISA court, for which he is personally and totally responsible. This alone precludes him from sitting at the Trump impeachment in the Senate. He is a fact witness to the corruption the Senate case must investigate.
Declassification any day now....any day now....any day now....:71:...any day now....any day now...



The someone in the FBI lied and falsified documents in order to spy on Carter Page for over a year.... in order to spy on Trump.

How do you spy on Trump by wiretapping a low level advisor who left the campaign a month ago and went straight to Moscow?

Why does the FBI falsify information on Carter Page, information coming from the CIA that was exculpatory for Page..... , if he's just a low level advisor? Answer is, they were looking for more, wherever they could look, to pin something on Trump and were willing then, and still are willing to break rules along the way to do it.


Simple, (some at) FBI thought he had something going on with Russians and were playing hardball to find it.
 
The Federalist Papers ^ | 12/26/2019

FISA Court Neck Deep In Surveillance On Trump Campaign, Knew Of Application Issues, Report Carmine Sabia By Carmine Sabia Published December 26, 2019 at 9:49am

The Deep State is a real thing, and with each new report or finding we discover that it is deeper than any of us have imagined.

In the most recent case, it appears that the FISA courts were aware that the applications to spy on Carter Page, an aide with President Donald Trump’s campaign.

After the report of Inspector General Michael Horowitz, the head of the FISA courts, Judge Rosemary Collyer, ripped into the FBI for what it did.

“The FBI’s handling of the Carter Page applications, as portrayed in the [Office of the inspector general] report, was antithetical to the heightened duty of candor described above.

“The frequency with which representations made by FBI personnel turned out to be unsupported or contradicted by information in their possession, and with which they withheld information detrimental to their case, calls into question whether information contained in other FBI applications is reliable,” the judge said. Read More

But that could have just been a smokescreen to avoid getting heat on herself and the courts as it has now been found that the courts were notified of the issues with the applications beginning in 2016.

NSA Director Admiral Mike Rogers made it known to the court that there were issues with the way the NSA was complying with minimization procedure.

That occurred on, October 24, 2016, notable as it was a mere three days that the FISA court approved a warrant to spy on Page, The Epoch Times reported.

“On October 24, 2016, the government orally apprised the Court of significant non-compliance with the NSA’s minimization procedures involving queries of data acquired under Section 702 using U.S. person identifiers. The full scope of non-compliant querying practices had not been previously disclosed to the Court,” it said. Is the Deep State against Trump? Yes No Completing this poll entitles you to our news updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

“Two days later, on the day the Court otherwise would have had to complete its review of the certifications and procedures, the government made a written submission regarding those compliance problems … and the Court held a hearing to address them,” it said.

“The government reported that the NSA IG and OCO were conducting other reviews covering different time periods, with preliminary results suggesting that the problem was widespread during all periods under review,” it said.

The FISA court was unaware of the FISA “query” violations until they were presented to the court by then-NSA Director Rogers.

The NSD and FBI knew Rogers was conducting his own compliance review. Rogers knew the NSD was finalizing its 2016 certification. The NSD was aware that its 2016 certification lacked material and legally required disclosure.

The NSD carries the “responsibility of overseeing the foreign intelligence, counterintelligence and other national security activities of the United States Intelligence Community.” Duties include “representing the government before the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC).”

Additionally, the Operations Section of the NSD is “responsible for preparing and filing all applications for Court orders pursuant to FISA.” The original Page FISA application, along with the three subsequent renewals, carried a signature page from a DOJ attorney, whose name was redacted, but is almost certainly associated with the NSD.

The Deep State runs deep and it makes one wonder if this entire scheme had the involvement of the courts too.

-------------

The Chief Justice has not moved to reform the FISA court, for which he is personally and totally responsible. This alone precludes him from sitting at the Trump impeachment in the Senate. He is a fact witness to the corruption the Senate case must investigate.
Declassification any day now....any day now....any day now....:71:...any day now....any day now...



The someone in the FBI lied and falsified documents in order to spy on Carter Page for over a year.... in order to spy on Trump.

How do you spy on Trump by wiretapping a low level advisor who left the campaign a month ago and went straight to Moscow?

Why does the FBI falsify information on Carter Page, information coming from the CIA that was exculpatory for Page..... , if he's just a low level advisor? Answer is, they were looking for more, wherever they could look, to pin something on Trump and were willing then, and still are willing to break rules along the way to do it.


Simple, (some at) FBI thought he had something going on with Russians and were playing hardball to find it.



They lied to a FISA court to get warrants. That not playing "hard ball", thats criminal. We all know you dont do something like that for a little fish.We all know Democrats wanted to impeach Trump before he was sworn in as newly elected president, so we can stop pretending now. OF course it will all come out in the Durham report.
 
Today I saw an episode of Forensic Files where this douche bag got off because the prosecution’s blood splatter expert overstated his experience. Clearly the guy was as guilty as hell.

That was 2001. Stop pretending that this is the first time the cops ever cut corners.

Your blob is just as guilty of abuse of power.
 
Today I saw an episode of Forensic Files where this douche bag got off because the prosecution’s blood splatter expert overstated his experience. Clearly the guy was as guilty as hell.

That was 2001. Stop pretending that this is the first time the cops ever cut corners.

Your blob is just as guilty of abuse of power.



Cut corners??? changing an email from the CIA that basically said Carter Page was one of theirs ... to saying he was a Russian agent. So they could keep the warrants coming. Thats not cutting corners, its bullshit and only done because of pro- Democrat, anti- Trump bias. Its fucking treason.

Second Damning FBI Lie About Carter Page Revealed In IG Report: Sperry


"The FBI and Special Counsel Robert Mueller repeatedly kept alive a damning narrative that investigators knew to be false: namely, that a junior Trump campaign aide as a favor to the Kremlin had “gutted” an anti-Russia and pro-Ukraine plank in the Republican Party platform at the GOP’s 2016 convention. "
 
Today I saw an episode of Forensic Files where this douche bag got off because the prosecution’s blood splatter expert overstated his experience. Clearly the guy was as guilty as hell.

That was 2001. Stop pretending that this is the first time the cops ever cut corners.

Your blob is just as guilty of abuse of power.



Cut corners??? changing an email from the CIA that basically said Carter Page was one of theirs ... to saying he was a Russian agent. So they could keep the warrants coming. Thats not cutting corners, its bullshit and only done because of pro- Democrat, anti- Trump bias. Its fucking treason.

Second Damning FBI Lie About Carter Page Revealed In IG Report: Sperry


"The FBI and Special Counsel Robert Mueller repeatedly kept alive a damning narrative that investigators knew to be false: namely, that a junior Trump campaign aide as a favor to the Kremlin had “gutted” an anti-Russia and pro-Ukraine plank in the Republican Party platform at the GOP’s 2016 convention. "

The Blob’s IG found no bias shitbrains
 
Like some of us keep saying 2020 as you get closer to the election the american people will either see justice ...or not


Quick hit from this morning on Fox News.



Guy Lewis former top DOJ attorney — Durham has already met with Gina Haspel to gain email and phone records on John Brennan. This is going to expose the ugly underbelly of the CIA, including high-level officials.

OK BOOMER⚙️PASSIVE LISTENING POST[4K] on Twitter
 
Declassification any day now....any day now....any day now....:71:...any day now....any day now...



The someone in the FBI lied and falsified documents in order to spy on Carter Page for over a year.... in order to spy on Trump.

How do you spy on Trump by wiretapping a low level advisor who left the campaign a month ago and went straight to Moscow?

Why does the FBI falsify information on Carter Page, information coming from the CIA that was exculpatory for Page..... , if he's just a low level advisor? Answer is, they were looking for more, wherever they could look, to pin something on Trump and were willing then, and still are willing to break rules along the way to do it.


Simple, (some at) FBI thought he had something going on with Russians and were playing hardball to find it.

They lied to a FISA court to get warrants. That not playing "hard ball", thats criminal. We all know you dont do something like that for a little fish.We all know Democrats wanted to impeach Trump before he was sworn in as newly elected president, so we can stop pretending now. OF course it will all come out in the Durham report.

Who is "they"? Republicans like Comey, McCabe and Rosenstein?

Big fish here is illegal Russian interference in our election and Carter was suspected of working with them.

If Trump campaign really didn't have much to do with Carter as they claimed then there was no connection there...right?
 
Today I saw an episode of Forensic Files where this douche bag got off because the prosecution’s blood splatter expert overstated his experience. Clearly the guy was as guilty as hell.

That was 2001. Stop pretending that this is the first time the cops ever cut corners.

Your blob is just as guilty of abuse of power.



Cut corners??? changing an email from the CIA that basically said Carter Page was one of theirs ... to saying he was a Russian agent. So they could keep the warrants coming. Thats not cutting corners, its bullshit and only done because of pro- Democrat, anti- Trump bias. Its fucking treason.

Second Damning FBI Lie About Carter Page Revealed In IG Report: Sperry


"The FBI and Special Counsel Robert Mueller repeatedly kept alive a damning narrative that investigators knew to be false: namely, that a junior Trump campaign aide as a favor to the Kremlin had “gutted” an anti-Russia and pro-Ukraine plank in the Republican Party platform at the GOP’s 2016 convention. "

The Blob’s IG found no bias shitbrains



Idiot. The IG report was not an investigation. Peoples word was simply taken at face value when they were asked if they were biased.
 

Forum List

Back
Top