Toronado3800
Gold Member
- Nov 15, 2009
- 7,608
- 560
- 140
Shall not be infringed
a bunch of commas and militia talk. Its pretty poorly written or needs translated into real English.
What to do is look at how it was enforced in 1800 and that seems to be that folks could own guns and carry them around. I don't see the debate there.
Maybe guns can be registered, maybe guns can be restricted from certain places but it seems clear the application of the 2nd during the lifetimes of its writers even if it was poorly written.
Only because people like you are anti gun nutters
Smart politics would be to be friends with the guy who says the writers of the 2nd obviously intended folks to own firearms.
But yeah, if you wanna argue, I think your guns are effectively registered if you have a Google or Facebook app on your smartphone and the NRA is a bunch of idiots or scared sissy team worshipers for not realizing it and defending privacy rights.
Once again though, the implementation of the 2nd is clear, the NRA are idiot sissies or team worshipers and I'm just bringing the latter up since you poked me.
That's nice....but...shall not be infringed. Suck on it
"A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed."
ok, go join the National Guard and get a gun then! They might just send you to defend the border from folks we should make into future Americans lol.
Really your best argument is looking at how it was implemented not quoting the darned thing.