Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
It is extremely rare for a Down's syndrome fetus to jeopardize the health of the mother.
I suppose that is true if you think mental well being doesn't influence health.
Like I said, they find a Down's Syndrome child inconvenient.
Your right plays a game with laws
This is from a nonpolitcal site too
Are you frigging kidding me?
Did you look at the banner of the organization?
"BIOPOLITICAL TIMES" and you say it is non-political?
"The weblog of the Center for Genetics and Society, offering commentary and news on human biotechnologies".
You have got to be kidding me!
Immie
Cultural pressure to bear male offspring leads some immigrant Indian women in the United States to use readily available reproductive technology in an effort to select sons or abort female fetuses, steps that are legal in this country but illegal in India, according to a University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) study.
Women identified female in-laws and husbands as sources of significant pressure to have male children. This was especially true when in-laws lived nearby, but also occurred if they remained in India.
This research was supported by the UCB-UCSF Joint Medical Program Research Fund, the Berkeley Human Rights Fellowship, and the UCSF Pathways to Careers in Clinical and Translational Research Fellowship, a program of the Clinical and Translational Science Institute.
Are you frigging kidding me?
Did you look at the banner of the organization?
"BIOPOLITICAL TIMES" and you say it is non-political?
"The weblog of the Center for Genetics and Society, offering commentary and news on human biotechnologies".
You have got to be kidding me!
Immie
She's a moron and a liar. What do you expect?
They are from the EXACT same site
If it's happening in Canada it's happening in the US.
Did you not see my posts about this where a very well known and respected physician here has called for a delay in the notification of gender to prevent female fetacide?
That article that I linked to also points out that many young wives who already have one or two daughters are now being forced to abort based on gender by husbands who want a son or parents or in laws who want a grandson.
Do you really believe we are isolated from this?
We aren't isolated from this. I have posted evidence we aren't on Page 3.
Yuppers.I saw that. I can't believe that posters like Inthemiddle can't believe what we post when we link to non political websites.
So now you leftist shit stains aren't satisfied with saying abortion is something that a woman should be able to decide to do with her own body, now you want to classify MURDER of the unborn as a RIGHT?
You people are truly sickening, immoral, heartless bastards.
Hmm, Abortion is legal in this country. What have the Republicans accomplished in getting that changed?
If I recall correctly just a few years ago, the RED state of South Dakota make abortion illegal, called it murder. The voters of that RED state voted to dump that law.
Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
Most Americans rightly regard sex-selective abortions as odious; in a 2006 Zogby poll, an overwhelming 86 percent of Americans agreed that such abortions should be illegal. But they're not illegal - and as economists Douglas Almond and Lena Edlund indicate in the latest issue of PNAS, they are now occurring in the United States, too.
Almond and Edlund examined the ratio of boys to girls among US children born to Chinese, Korean, and Indian parents. For the first children of these Asian-American families, the sex ratio was the normal 1.05-to-1. But when the first baby is a girl, the odds of the second being a boy rose to 1.17-to-1. After two sisters, the likelihood of the third being a son leaped to 1.51-to-1. This is clear "evidence of sex selection, most likely at the prenatal stage," the authors write. Prenatal sex tests for pregnant women are now available earlier, more cheaply, and more conveniently than ever, "raising the prospect of sex selection becoming more widely practiced in the near future."
This is from a nonpolitcal site too
Are you frigging kidding me?
Did you look at the banner of the organization?
"BIOPOLITICAL TIMES" and you say it is non-political?
"The weblog of the Center for Genetics and Society, offering commentary and news on human biotechnologies".
You have got to be kidding me!
Immie
dude, that's the weblog from the o/p's site.
I'm not convinced the Republican Party wants to make abortion illegal. In fact, I would venture to say if there was such a thing as a truth serum and we could give it to Republican leaders and ask them if they want to make Abortion illegal, they would tell us, "hell no we don't want to make it illegal. As long as it is legal we have a defining point between us and the Democrats that we can use to our advantage. If we didn't have this issue... well, we would look like the Democrats and we can't have that."
We aren't isolated from this. I have posted evidence we aren't on Page 3.
Yuppers.I saw that. I can't believe that posters like Inthemiddle can't believe what we post when we link to non political websites.
Were you not talking about the OP link?
Are you frigging kidding me?
Did you look at the banner of the organization?
"BIOPOLITICAL TIMES" and you say it is non-political?
"The weblog of the Center for Genetics and Society, offering commentary and news on human biotechnologies".
You have got to be kidding me!
Immie
She's a moron and a liar. What do you expect?
as opposed to the wacko o/p?
i'd say they deserve each other.
Are you frigging kidding me?
Did you look at the banner of the organization?
"BIOPOLITICAL TIMES" and you say it is non-political?
"The weblog of the Center for Genetics and Society, offering commentary and news on human biotechnologies".
You have got to be kidding me!
Immie
dude, that's the weblog from the o/p's site.
And your point?
No one claimed the OP was not political.
Immie
The OP called it non political
I'm not convinced the Republican Party wants to make abortion illegal. In fact, I would venture to say if there was such a thing as a truth serum and we could give it to Republican leaders and ask them if they want to make Abortion illegal, they would tell us, "hell no we don't want to make it illegal. As long as it is legal we have a defining point between us and the Democrats that we can use to our advantage. If we didn't have this issue... well, we would look like the Democrats and we can't have that."
Just making shit up now, are we?
I'm not convinced the Republican Party wants to make abortion illegal. In fact, I would venture to say if there was such a thing as a truth serum and we could give it to Republican leaders and ask them if they want to make Abortion illegal, they would tell us, "hell no we don't want to make it illegal. As long as it is legal we have a defining point between us and the Democrats that we can use to our advantage. If we didn't have this issue... well, we would look like the Democrats and we can't have that."
Just making shit up now, are we?
Um, the post was clearly an opinion. Do you understand that?
Immie
If its still in the womb, many liberals can't see an issue.
Just making shit up now, are we?
Um, the post was clearly an opinion. Do you understand that?
Immie
I know how that tactic works. You aren't fooling anyone.
