You have to support your assertion with clear evidence, stats, analysis, reason, and so forth. Your half baked nonsense does not cut it. No one is required to rebut what is rebutted in its own argument. You have only an unsupported assertion.
You clearly have no idea of about what you are talking.
What don't you understand? What do you need clear evidence about?
Let me ask you this. If I gave you a hand-full of rocks and told you to use it as money, could you use it as money? Nope, cause there are rocks EVERYWHERE.
Why are pennies worth a penny? Cause there is a shit-load of them that's why.
Of course, the only reason they're worth anything today is because you believe they're worth a penny.
Is it not common sense that if the government continues to print money it will devalue?
It has already happened in the last 30 years. The government has printed more and more money, thereby, devaluing it. You could use to travel to Mexico with a hundred dollars and live like a king for a while. Now the Mexican dollar is equal to, if not more, than our own. This concept is especially true when the overall production of the country does not increase because you have more money to spend on the same amount of products. This is also illustrated by inflation. You may have more "money" but it buys less because the prices of goods increase...........
I'm not going to post a million little links on something I know, and countless others, know to be the truth.
I have posted nothing but fact. I don't mind sitting on here calling you an idiot all day. Your the one claiming that what I say is false. You disprove it.
Last edited: