Feel Good Story of the Year

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by Katzndogz, Jan 13, 2013.

  1. Katzndogz
    Offline

    Katzndogz Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2011
    Messages:
    65,659
    Thanks Received:
    7,418
    Trophy Points:
    1,830
    Ratings:
    +8,337
    Robbery victim wants to thank Good Samaritans who came to his rescue | khou.com Houston

    After he was robbed, Dorsey began running down the street and says two men in a Mercedes asked him what had happened.
    Dorsey told them and they not only caught up with the suspect, but they started shooting at him.
    The suspect fired back. In the end, the two witnesses turned vigilantes won and took down the bad guy.
    “I don’t believe in guns,” said Dorsey. “I don’t own a gun. I’m totally at the mercy of my saviors. They obviously sent two angels to help me. These people protected me when I couldn’t protect myself.”
    After the robber had been shot, police say he jumped over a fence and was attacked by a German Shepherd. That attack prevented him from getting away.

    Shot, then held by a dog until the police arrived. Libs would rather the robber got away because the guns were banned, next the dogs will be banned too.
     
  2. there4eyeM
    Offline

    there4eyeM unlicensed metaphysician

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2012
    Messages:
    8,056
    Thanks Received:
    820
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Ratings:
    +2,296
    Points we are supposed to learn from this story:

    - Robbery now carries the death penalty.
    - The guys in the car started shooting on the word of someone they didn't know.
    - Anyone who questions that this is good news is a 'lib' and, thus not only wrong, but evil.

    Certain people here will find this a happy story.

    Some others will think a bit.
     
  3. Katzndogz
    Offline

    Katzndogz Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2011
    Messages:
    65,659
    Thanks Received:
    7,418
    Trophy Points:
    1,830
    Ratings:
    +8,337
    The police take the word of people they don't know every day.

    A lib will totally ignore the fact that the "suspect" fired his gun at the two pursuers. They won't pay a bit of attention to that. The robber is an innocent man enforcing his rights to equality.

    Then he got bitten by a dog. Yes, a feel good story. If robbery carried the death penalty, carried out immediately, we would have way fewer robberies.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  4. TruthSeeker56
    Offline

    TruthSeeker56 Silver Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2011
    Messages:
    2,899
    Thanks Received:
    482
    Trophy Points:
    98
    Location:
    New Hampshire
    Ratings:
    +496
    Don't give Obama any ideas.

    First, he wants the government to decide what medical treatments our senior citizens receive, based on "cost versus benefit".

    Next, to control the population, Obama will make parking violations subject to the death penalty.
     
  5. there4eyeM
    Offline

    there4eyeM unlicensed metaphysician

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2012
    Messages:
    8,056
    Thanks Received:
    820
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Ratings:
    +2,296
    Police shoot people on the mere word of others?

    Who fired first?

    Fewer robberies or more barbarity?

    'Lib', whatever that means to whomever, has zero to do with it. Anyone seriously promoting this kind of action is assuring that firearms will be further controlled.
     
  6. Katzndogz
    Offline

    Katzndogz Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2011
    Messages:
    65,659
    Thanks Received:
    7,418
    Trophy Points:
    1,830
    Ratings:
    +8,337
    According to the article, the robber fired first.

    I expect that libs will want firearms further controlled for the very reason that the streets must be made safe for criminals.
     
  7. there4eyeM
    Offline

    there4eyeM unlicensed metaphysician

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2012
    Messages:
    8,056
    Thanks Received:
    820
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Ratings:
    +2,296
    Odd that the article gives the chronology in the same order as the OP; i.e., the guys chasing fired first.

    I expect people who refuse to be reasonable about firearms will see them severely limited. That is too bad, because I see nothing wrong with weapons in responsible hands. Those who present no danger will be regulated the same as the irresponsible.
     
  8. Dot Com
    Offline

    Dot Com Nullius in verba Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2011
    Messages:
    49,369
    Thanks Received:
    7,545
    Trophy Points:
    1,830
    Location:
    Fairfax, NoVA
    Ratings:
    +16,283
    is there a name what wrong w/ you Katzndogz aside from being a certified rw kool aid drinking :alcoholic: FAILtroll?
     
  9. Ernie S.
    Offline

    Ernie S. Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2010
    Messages:
    33,683
    Thanks Received:
    7,721
    Trophy Points:
    1,140
    Location:
    Sweet Home Alabama
    Ratings:
    +12,469
    No, idiot Those who present no danger will grumble and moan but comply up to a point. Criminals i.e. the irresponsible will chuckle to themselves and be happy that their victims will be further limited.
     
  10. hjmick
    Offline

    hjmick Gold Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2007
    Messages:
    16,177
    Thanks Received:
    4,679
    Trophy Points:
    270
    Location:
    Charleston, SC
    Ratings:
    +7,119
    I posted this last night, got nothing.
     

Share This Page