Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
You are blindly supporting a government that is now trying to steal power and swallowing what they tell you without ever considering the fact that these are the same people who enacted such gems as "The Patriot Act" and bailouts.
You are blindly supporting a government that is now trying to steal power and swallowing what they tell you without ever considering the fact that these are the same people who enacted such gems as "The Patriot Act" and bailouts.
O'Really? I don't blindly support anything. Just because I said I don't support death threats to the POTUS in any form, I'm a blind drone for the gov't?
I've actually read the Patriot Act. And Title 18 among a myriad of other shit. We haven't discussed it. Half the morons in here don't even understand basic civics.
You need to lay off the starbucks, seriously........I'm worried about ya.
then you know the PA was passed under a dem controled senateYou are blindly supporting a government that is now trying to steal power and swallowing what they tell you without ever considering the fact that these are the same people who enacted such gems as "The Patriot Act" and bailouts.
O'Really? I don't blindly support anything. Just because I said I don't support death threats to the POTUS in any form, I'm a blind drone for the gov't?
I've actually read the Patriot Act. And Title 18 among a myriad of other shit. We haven't discussed it. Half the morons in here don't even understand basic civics.
You need to lay off the starbucks, seriously........I'm worried about ya.
I have read things that you probably couldn't even fathom myself.
then you know the PA was passed under a dem controled senateYou are blindly supporting a government that is now trying to steal power and swallowing what they tell you without ever considering the fact that these are the same people who enacted such gems as "The Patriot Act" and bailouts.
O'Really? I don't blindly support anything. Just because I said I don't support death threats to the POTUS in any form, I'm a blind drone for the gov't?
I've actually read the Patriot Act. And Title 18 among a myriad of other shit. We haven't discussed it. Half the morons in here don't even understand basic civics.
You need to lay off the starbucks, seriously........I'm worried about ya.
and the dems havent done anything to stop it since they have had full control of both bodies of congress for over 2 years now
Are you going to provide a link to the source of the "up 400%" claim or not?
I posted more than one link above.
Nowhere near 400% of what any president has received ... not to mention if you factor in the higher population level now from any other time period I am certain he has had fewer than any president.
really, how does saying it wasn illegal means i supported it???then you know the PA was passed under a dem controled senateO'Really? I don't blindly support anything. Just because I said I don't support death threats to the POTUS in any form, I'm a blind drone for the gov't?
I've actually read the Patriot Act. And Title 18 among a myriad of other shit. We haven't discussed it. Half the morons in here don't even understand basic civics.
You need to lay off the starbucks, seriously........I'm worried about ya.
and the dems havent done anything to stop it since they have had full control of both bodies of congress for over 2 years now
hmmm.........but you were adamantly FOR the Iraq invasion and insist it was legal. I know I'm borrowing from another thread here so don't go all postal and ask me to link to your own posts.
I find your opposing views on these two matters to be puzzling.
you still havent supported the 400% claimI posted more than one link above.
Nowhere near 400% of what any president has received ... not to mention if you factor in the higher population level now from any other time period I am certain he has had fewer than any president.
The population has grown that much in the last year?
really, how does saying it wasn illegal means i supported it???then you know the PA was passed under a dem controled senate
and the dems havent done anything to stop it since they have had full control of both bodies of congress for over 2 years now
hmmm.........but you were adamantly FOR the Iraq invasion and insist it was legal. I know I'm borrowing from another thread here so don't go all postal and ask me to link to your own posts.
I find your opposing views on these two matters to be puzzling.
wow, you are not very good at this, are you?
i DID and DO support it, but just saying it wasnt illegal doesnt imply support
i had many issues with how things were done, but it was the right thing to do, only it should have been done 12 years sooner
I posted more than one link above.
Nowhere near 400% of what any president has received ... not to mention if you factor in the higher population level now from any other time period I am certain he has had fewer than any president.
The population has grown that much in the last year?
Really?As far as threats... as long as we have the 1st amendment people should be able to say whatever they want. THAT is what makes this country great, not the government's ability to monitor the radio.
The 1st amendment does NOT protect speech with regard to death threats to the President of the United States. Threatening the President in any way is illegal.
[Death] threats in themselves are illegal, even for private persons. You can't just say anything you want. That's not what the 1st amendment is about.
Technically ... yes and no. Only if they are sent directly to said person if they are a government official can they be considered threats, otherwise they are protected.
ok, you can fuck off tooreally, how does saying it wasn illegal means i supported it???hmmm.........but you were adamantly FOR the Iraq invasion and insist it was legal. I know I'm borrowing from another thread here so don't go all postal and ask me to link to your own posts.
I find your opposing views on these two matters to be puzzling.
wow, you are not very good at this, are you?
i DID and DO support it, but just saying it wasnt illegal doesnt imply support
i had many issues with how things were done, but it was the right thing to do, only it should have been done 12 years sooner
You really don't need anyone to argue with, you're doing fine on your own........with yourself.......
There are issues and then there are issues.
and in which link does it say the death threats against POTUS have gone up 400%?Really?The 1st amendment does NOT protect speech with regard to death threats to the President of the United States. Threatening the President in any way is illegal.
[Death] threats in themselves are illegal, even for private persons. You can't just say anything you want. That's not what the 1st amendment is about.
Technically ... yes and no. Only if they are sent directly to said person if they are a government official can they be considered threats, otherwise they are protected.
Wow. You should go help guy out; perhaps you can get his conviction overturned:
Man convicted of making death threats against Obama | L.A. Now | Los Angeles Times
Too bad you weren't counsel for these folks:
FBI Probes Possible Obama Death Threat - CBS News
Man Charged For Alleged Obama Death Threat - CBS News
Man Held In Obama Death Threat - August 8, 2008
Suspect in Obama threat found competent - Local - SunHerald.com
You've clearly missed your calling.
What did the post say that I was responding to?and in which link does it say the death threats against POTUS have gone up 400%?Really?Technically ... yes and no. Only if they are sent directly to said person if they are a government official can they be considered threats, otherwise they are protected.
Wow. You should go help guy out; perhaps you can get his conviction overturned:
Man convicted of making death threats against Obama | L.A. Now | Los Angeles Times
Too bad you weren't counsel for these folks:
FBI Probes Possible Obama Death Threat - CBS News
Man Charged For Alleged Obama Death Threat - CBS News
Man Held In Obama Death Threat - August 8, 2008
Suspect in Obama threat found competent - Local - SunHerald.com
You've clearly missed your calling.
As far as threats... as long as we have the 1st amendment people should be able to say whatever they want. THAT is what makes this country great, not the government's ability to monitor the radio.
The 1st amendment does NOT protect speech with regard to death threats to the President of the United States. Threatening the President in any way is illegal.
[Death] threats in themselves are illegal, even for private persons. You can't just say anything you want. That's not what the 1st amendment is about.
Technically ... yes and no. Only if they are sent directly to said person if they are a government official can they be considered threats, otherwise they are protected.
no, because i dont care what you were replying to, i'm still waiting for the link that says death threats against POTUS have risen 400% since Obama was sworn inWhat did the post say that I was responding to?and in which link does it say the death threats against POTUS have gone up 400%?Really?
Wow. You should go help guy out; perhaps you can get his conviction overturned:
Man convicted of making death threats against Obama | L.A. Now | Los Angeles Times
Too bad you weren't counsel for these folks:
FBI Probes Possible Obama Death Threat - CBS News
Man Charged For Alleged Obama Death Threat - CBS News
Man Held In Obama Death Threat - August 8, 2008
Suspect in Obama threat found competent - Local - SunHerald.com
You've clearly missed your calling.
Here. Try reading it again:
The 1st amendment does NOT protect speech with regard to death threats to the President of the United States. Threatening the President in any way is illegal.
[Death] threats in themselves are illegal, even for private persons. You can't just say anything you want. That's not what the 1st amendment is about.
Technically ... yes and no. Only if they are sent directly to said person if they are a government official can they be considered threats, otherwise they are protected.
There. Does that clear it up for you?
yeah, YOUThere appears to be a deficit among certain posters with regard to being able to focus.
[off to check the lunar schedule]
no, because i dont care what you were replying to, i'm still waiting for the link that says death threats against POTUS have risen 400% since Obama was sworn inWhat did the post say that I was responding to?and in which link does it say the death threats against POTUS have gone up 400%?
Here. Try reading it again:
Technically ... yes and no. Only if they are sent directly to said person if they are a government official can they be considered threats, otherwise they are protected.
There. Does that clear it up for you?
or are you now dropping that claim?
yeah, YOUThere appears to be a deficit among certain posters with regard to being able to focus.
[off to check the lunar schedule]
