FBI is wrapping up e-mail investigation with no evidence Clinton willfully violated the law

[Papageorgio]

To most Democrats, especially in the MSM, Bill Clinton is a 'loveable ole pervert.' But the reality is actually much darker. He's sexually abused young women for many years. He's a devious sex predator like Bill Cosby. And his wife is an accomplice. She's defended him and viciously attacked his numerous victims. They're both very bad people who should be in jail.

Since the 1990's conservative oligarchs have been paying people to come up with salacious stories about the Clintons, without any evidence that any of these things happened. It's pretty clear that Clinton is a serial adulterer, but the stories of his so-called sexual assaults come across as really ham-handed attempts at seduction. And when told "No", he stopped.

The one and only woman who has accused Clinton of rape, has also publicly stated that it never happened. Which is the lie and which is the truth? None of the other women filed suit, laid charges, or filed a complaint at the time.

Monica Lewinsky told friends she was "packing her knee pads" and moving to Washington. Clinton didn't "prey upon a young intern". She was young and foolish, but she was nobody's victim.

Again, the victims are the problem not the perp.

Sorry, Cosby denied and denied and with the number of women coming forward, I believe he is guilty. The same with Packwood. The weight of the evidence. I also believe by the numbers that have come forward Clinton is guilty.

For the champion of women's causes to flatly dismiss all the allegations as "bimbo eruptions" knowing her husbands wandering dick is dishonest at best, but we all know Clinton is dishonest. Ask the Libyans who Clinton lied so that a regime change took place. At least Obama is now regretting that decision.

 

[Dragonlady]

Again, the victims are the problem not the perp.

Sorry, Cosby denied and denied and with the number of women coming forward, I believe he is guilty. The same with Packwood. The weight of the evidence. I also believe by the numbers that have come forward Clinton is guilty.

For the champion of women's causes to flatly dismiss all the allegations as "bimbo eruptions" knowing her husbands wandering dick is dishonest at best, but we all know Clinton is dishonest. Ask the Libyans who Clinton lied so that a regime change took place. At least Obama is now regretting that decision.

Here is the difference: No one is paying Cosby's victims to smear the man. The statute of limitations has expired on Cosby's crimes, and these women have nothing to gain by coming forward. Also, their stories have been consistent and remarkably similar.

In the case of the Clintons, right wing oligarchs have been hiring people to smear them since before Bill was elected President. The woman who you say Clinton raped, has given sworn testimony that he did not rape her. Which time was she lying? When she said he raped her, or when she said he didn't.

There is a quid pro quo going on here. Paula Jones was given cosmetic surgery, and a new wardrobe by conservatives to go after Bill Clinton. Her entire lawsuit was funded by Dark Money.

Conservatives operatives have spent a lot of time and money finding women who would say these things about Clinton, nobody was looking to take down Cosby.

I'm not suggesting that Bill Clinton isn't a serial adulterer, or that he didn't come on to these women, but they said no and he stopped, and that's according to their own accounts. Only Broaderick says he raped her, or he didn't, whichever of her interviews is the truth. It is to be noted that the denial was a sworn affidavit.

None of the other women have filed affidavits, law suits, or testified under oath. So no, given the history of the conservative movement to discredit the Clintons, the money they're prepared to spend to do it, and the lack of convincing accounts (no affidavits, no sworn testimony), Bill Clinton's "victims" are very much less creditable than the women who gave evidence against Bill Cosby, with absolutely nothing to gain.

 

[JBond]

CNN Reports FBI Has Found ‘No Criminal Wrongdoing’ in Hillary Clinton Email ‘Investigation’

Some of Hillary Clinton’s closest aides, including her longtime adviser Huma Abedin, have provided interviews to federal investigators, as the FBI probe into the security of her private email server nears completion, U.S. officials briefed on the investigation tell CNN. The investigation is still ongoing, but so far investigators haven’t found evidence to prove that Clinton willfully violated the law the U.S. officials say.

One the e-mail investigation is over, is will be over for Donald. She will CRUSH HIM IN NOVEMBER! And you Donald supporter will deny you ever supported him. FUNNY!

Delusional at best. Huma refused to cooperate with the FBI. Seems like you fell for the lies again. Damn, liberals are dumb.

 

[Fair&Balanced]

This threads still going on? You morons still believe you have to willfully commit espionage?

Morons.

 

[LeftofLeft]

And the string of total BS ''scandals'' goes on and on...The Pub Propaganda machine and the haters/dupes are a pure disgrace. Is Trump a dupe or a liar, anyway? lol

Hillary has been caught in so many lies but because she has a (D) next to her name, you and the the masses have been conditioned to throw any and all logic for a critical eye out the door and salute what the party tells you. You have no problem with a politically appointed Secretary of State a couple of heartbeats away from the Oval Office hosting and storing a private email server with State files and data that could compromise security of this Nation. That is a proven fact among you people.

 

[Fair&Balanced]

And the string of total BS ''scandals'' goes on and on...The Pub Propaganda machine and the haters/dupes are a pure disgrace. Is Trump a dupe or a liar, anyway? lol

Hillary has been caught in so many lies but because she has a (D) next to her name, you and the the masses have been conditioned to throw any and all logic for a critical eye out the door and salute what the party tells you. You have no problem with a politically appointed Secretary of State a couple of heartbeats away from the Oval Office hosting and storing a private email server with State files and data that could compromise security of this Nation. That is a proven fact among you people.

They're too busy fretting over Trump's tax returns to worry about such things.


LOL what a bunch of morons.

 

[boedicca]

Again, the victims are the problem not the perp.

Sorry, Cosby denied and denied and with the number of women coming forward, I believe he is guilty. The same with Packwood. The weight of the evidence. I also believe by the numbers that have come forward Clinton is guilty.

For the champion of women's causes to flatly dismiss all the allegations as "bimbo eruptions" knowing her husbands wandering dick is dishonest at best, but we all know Clinton is dishonest. Ask the Libyans who Clinton lied so that a regime change took place. At least Obama is now regretting that decision.

Here is the difference: No one is paying Cosby's victims to smear the man. The statute of limitations has expired on Cosby's crimes, and these women have nothing to gain by coming forward. Also, their stories have been consistent and remarkably similar.

In the case of the Clintons, right wing oligarchs have been hiring people to smear them since before Bill was elected President. The woman who you say Clinton raped, has given sworn testimony that he did not rape her. Which time was she lying? When she said he raped her, or when she said he didn't.

There is a quid pro quo going on here. Paula Jones was given cosmetic surgery, and a new wardrobe by conservatives to go after Bill Clinton. Her entire lawsuit was funded by Dark Money.

Conservatives operatives have spent a lot of time and money finding women who would say these things about Clinton, nobody was looking to take down Cosby.

I'm not suggesting that Bill Clinton isn't a serial adulterer, or that he didn't come on to these women, but they said no and he stopped, and that's according to their own accounts. Only Broaderick says he raped her, or he didn't, whichever of her interviews is the truth. It is to be noted that the denial was a sworn affidavit.

None of the other women have filed affidavits, law suits, or testified under oath. So no, given the history of the conservative movement to discredit the Clintons, the money they're prepared to spend to do it, and the lack of convincing accounts (no affidavits, no sworn testimony), Bill Clinton's "victims" are very much less creditable than the women who gave evidence against Bill Cosby, with absolutely nothing to gain.

IOW, you approve of the Clinton War On Women.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

Why don't people just wait for the investigation to conclude?

All this speculation is pointless

 

[paulitician]

To most Democrats, especially in the MSM, Bill Clinton is a 'loveable ole pervert.' But the reality is actually much darker. He's sexually abused young women for many years. He's a devious sex predator like Bill Cosby. And his wife is an accomplice. She's defended him and viciously attacked his numerous victims. They're both very bad people who should be in jail.

Since the 1990's conservative oligarchs have been paying people to come up with salacious stories about the Clintons, without any evidence that any of these things happened. It's pretty clear that Clinton is a serial adulterer, but the stories of his so-called sexual assaults come across as really ham-handed attempts at seduction. And when told "No", he stopped.

The one and only woman who has accused Clinton of rape, has also publicly stated that it never happened. Which is the lie and which is the truth? None of the other women filed suit, laid charges, or filed a complaint at the time.

Monica Lewinsky told friends she was "packing her knee pads" and moving to Washington. Clinton didn't "prey upon a young intern". She was young and foolish, but she was nobody's victim.

Again, the victims are the problem not the perp.

Sorry, Cosby denied and denied and with the number of women coming forward, I believe he is guilty. The same with Packwood. The weight of the evidence. I also believe by the numbers that have come forward Clinton is guilty.

For the champion of women's causes to flatly dismiss all the allegations as "bimbo eruptions" knowing her husbands wandering dick is dishonest at best, but we all know Clinton is dishonest. Ask the Libyans who Clinton lied so that a regime change took place. At least Obama is now regretting that decision.

Shame on em. Democrat Clinton Bootlickers actually try to portray him as the 'Victim.' He's a despicable sex predator. Him and Cosby should be in prison. Period, end of story.

 

[Papageorgio]

Again, the victims are the problem not the perp.

Sorry, Cosby denied and denied and with the number of women coming forward, I believe he is guilty. The same with Packwood. The weight of the evidence. I also believe by the numbers that have come forward Clinton is guilty.

For the champion of women's causes to flatly dismiss all the allegations as "bimbo eruptions" knowing her husbands wandering dick is dishonest at best, but we all know Clinton is dishonest. Ask the Libyans who Clinton lied so that a regime change took place. At least Obama is now regretting that decision.

Here is the difference: No one is paying Cosby's victims to smear the man. The statute of limitations has expired on Cosby's crimes, and these women have nothing to gain by coming forward. Also, their stories have been consistent and remarkably similar.

In the case of the Clintons, right wing oligarchs have been hiring people to smear them since before Bill was elected President. The woman who you say Clinton raped, has given sworn testimony that he did not rape her. Which time was she lying? When she said he raped her, or when she said he didn't.

There is a quid pro quo going on here. Paula Jones was given cosmetic surgery, and a new wardrobe by conservatives to go after Bill Clinton. Her entire lawsuit was funded by Dark Money.

Conservatives operatives have spent a lot of time and money finding women who would say these things about Clinton, nobody was looking to take down Cosby.

I'm not suggesting that Bill Clinton isn't a serial adulterer, or that he didn't come on to these women, but they said no and he stopped, and that's according to their own accounts. Only Broaderick says he raped her, or he didn't, whichever of her interviews is the truth. It is to be noted that the denial was a sworn affidavit.

None of the other women have filed affidavits, law suits, or testified under oath. So no, given the history of the conservative movement to discredit the Clintons, the money they're prepared to spend to do it, and the lack of convincing accounts (no affidavits, no sworn testimony), Bill Clinton's "victims" are very much less creditable than the women who gave evidence against Bill Cosby, with absolutely nothing to gain.

Paula Jones and Bill Clinton settled out of court for $850,000. Broaderick denied she was raped to stay out of going to a civil trial, which is quite common for rape victims. Also Flowers, Jones and Broaderick speak of Clinton biting their lip. He did not stop when asked, he pushed the envelope and an honest person would admit it. The facts and the incidents are too many and too coincidental.

 

[francoHFW]

And the string of total BS ''scandals'' goes on and on...The Pub Propaganda machine and the haters/dupes are a pure disgrace. Is Trump a dupe or a liar, anyway? lol

Hillary has been caught in so many lies but because she has a (D) next to her name, you and the the masses have been conditioned to throw any and all logic for a critical eye out the door and salute what the party tells you. You have no problem with a politically appointed Secretary of State a couple of heartbeats away from the Oval Office hosting and storing a private email server with State files and data that could compromise security of this Nation. That is a proven fact among you people.

Her server never hacked. State Dept was hacked. Total bs, dupe.

 

[LeftofLeft]

And the string of total BS ''scandals'' goes on and on...The Pub Propaganda machine and the haters/dupes are a pure disgrace. Is Trump a dupe or a liar, anyway? lol

Hillary has been caught in so many lies but because she has a (D) next to her name, you and the the masses have been conditioned to throw any and all logic for a critical eye out the door and salute what the party tells you. You have no problem with a politically appointed Secretary of State a couple of heartbeats away from the Oval Office hosting and storing a private email server with State files and data that could compromise security of this Nation. That is a proven fact among you people.

Her server never hacked. State Dept was hacked. Total bs, dupe.

How do you know the server was not hacked? Do you have inside knowledge to the forensics that were involved to verify and validate your claim? What is your background regarding Cybersecurity?

 

[francoHFW]

And the string of total BS ''scandals'' goes on and on...The Pub Propaganda machine and the haters/dupes are a pure disgrace. Is Trump a dupe or a liar, anyway? lol

Hillary has been caught in so many lies but because she has a (D) next to her name, you and the the masses have been conditioned to throw any and all logic for a critical eye out the door and salute what the party tells you. You have no problem with a politically appointed Secretary of State a couple of heartbeats away from the Oval Office hosting and storing a private email server with State files and data that could compromise security of this Nation. That is a proven fact among you people.

Her server never hacked. State Dept was hacked. Total bs, dupe.

How do you know the server was not hacked? Do you have inside knowledge to the forensics that were involved to verify and validate your claim? What is your background regarding Cybersecurity?

I watch real news. The New BS GOP hits you over the head with your ignorance every day.

 

[LeftofLeft]

And the string of total BS ''scandals'' goes on and on...The Pub Propaganda machine and the haters/dupes are a pure disgrace. Is Trump a dupe or a liar, anyway? lol

Hillary has been caught in so many lies but because she has a (D) next to her name, you and the the masses have been conditioned to throw any and all logic for a critical eye out the door and salute what the party tells you. You have no problem with a politically appointed Secretary of State a couple of heartbeats away from the Oval Office hosting and storing a private email server with State files and data that could compromise security of this Nation. That is a proven fact among you people.

Her server never hacked. State Dept was hacked. Total bs, dupe.

How do you know the server was not hacked? Do you have inside knowledge to the forensics that were involved to verify and validate your claim? What is your background regarding Cybersecurity?

I watch real news. The New BS GOP hits you over the head with your ignorance every day.

News has nothing to do with it. I am a Cybersecurity professional that knows a lot more than you. As for Real News, you mean like CBS that can't even use correct font from 1972 when Dan Rather is trying to manipulate the Election? That Real News?

 

[westwall]

And the string of total BS ''scandals'' goes on and on...The Pub Propaganda machine and the haters/dupes are a pure disgrace. Is Trump a dupe or a liar, anyway? lol

Hillary has been caught in so many lies but because she has a (D) next to her name, you and the the masses have been conditioned to throw any and all logic for a critical eye out the door and salute what the party tells you. You have no problem with a politically appointed Secretary of State a couple of heartbeats away from the Oval Office hosting and storing a private email server with State files and data that could compromise security of this Nation. That is a proven fact among you people.

Her server never hacked. State Dept was hacked. Total bs, dupe.

That's not what guciffer says.

 

[francoHFW]

And the string of total BS ''scandals'' goes on and on...The Pub Propaganda machine and the haters/dupes are a pure disgrace. Is Trump a dupe or a liar, anyway? lol

Hillary has been caught in so many lies but because she has a (D) next to her name, you and the the masses have been conditioned to throw any and all logic for a critical eye out the door and salute what the party tells you. You have no problem with a politically appointed Secretary of State a couple of heartbeats away from the Oval Office hosting and storing a private email server with State files and data that could compromise security of this Nation. That is a proven fact among you people.

Her server never hacked. State Dept was hacked. Total bs, dupe.

That's not what guciffer says.

Go with the criminal con man as usual....looking for leniency by lying duh.

 

[westwall]

And the string of total BS ''scandals'' goes on and on...The Pub Propaganda machine and the haters/dupes are a pure disgrace. Is Trump a dupe or a liar, anyway? lol

Hillary has been caught in so many lies but because she has a (D) next to her name, you and the the masses have been conditioned to throw any and all logic for a critical eye out the door and salute what the party tells you. You have no problem with a politically appointed Secretary of State a couple of heartbeats away from the Oval Office hosting and storing a private email server with State files and data that could compromise security of this Nation. That is a proven fact among you people.

Her server never hacked. State Dept was hacked. Total bs, dupe.

That's not what guciffer says.

Go with the criminal con man as usual....looking for leniency by lying duh.

The FBI did a deal with him so I will go with the pro's, not some nameless fluffer on a diatribe site.

 

[francoHFW]

And another lying scumbag becomes a hater dupe hero.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

This threads still going on? You morons still believe you have to willfully commit espionage?

Morons.

One has to actively engage in the activity for it to be espionage. It cannot be done passively. The intent is the crime.

Espionage
The act of securing information of a military or political nature that a competing nation holds secret. It can involve the analysis of diplomatic reports, publications, statistics, and broadcasts, as well as spying, a clandestine activity carried out by an individual or individuals working under secret identity to gather classified information on behalf of another entity or nation. In the United States, the organization that heads most activities dedicated to espionage is the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA).

espionage

 

[LeftofLeft]

And another lying scumbag becomes a hater dupe hero.

You keep calling lies and dupes yet never provide validation. You must be relying on what lies between your ears.