They have declared a war on women by not letting Carly Fiorina in the upcoming Republican debate. Don't get mad lefties, you set the rules on this, I just decided to lower my IQ 140 points and use your rationale.
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
BTW, rationale has an "e" on the end. Carly Fiorina was even fired from Hewlett-Packard after almost ruining the company.
They have declared a war on women by not letting Carly Fiorina in the upcoming Republican debate. Don't get mad lefties, you set the rules on this, I just decided to lower my IQ 140 points and use your rational.
BTW, rationale has an "e" on the end. Carly Fiorina was even fired from Hewlett-Packard after almost ruining the company.
I'll be sure to let Apple know of the error in their spell check. As for Fiorina, I'm no fan of hers, but I think much more highly than I do this person:
I think this is much like the standard conservative claim that any criticism of a black man is racism.
I have no idea why conservatives think that way, but nearly all of them do think that way. It's basicallly required of them to now say any criticism of a black man is racism, and any criticism of woman is sexism.
In direct contrast, the liberals think women and minorities can handle themselves. Conservatives need to learn to be like the liberals, more color-blind and gender-blind.
They have declared a war on women by not letting Carly Fiorina in the upcoming Republican debate. Don't get mad lefties, you set the rules on this, I just decided to lower my IQ 140
points and use your rationale.
Christopher Rants of the Des Moines Register published a column entitled “Why Are Republicans Letting CNN Pick Our President?” He explains in detail how the process for selecting debate participants was developed. At a high level, CNN and the RNC agreed on the criteria by which presidential candidates would be determined eligible to be on the main stage. The main stage is the prime time debate of the 10 highest polling candidates. Those that don’t make the cut are relegated to the non-prime time debate.
In the August 6th Fox News Channel debate, Carly Fiorina was appropriately placed in the non-prime time debate, based on the most current polls just before that debate. By many accounts, she won the debate, although she wasn’t on the main debate stage. I agree that she won. If you haven’t seen Fiorina speak, take a minute to watch her closing from the Fox News Channel debate.
The criteria for the CNN debate —agreed upon by the RNC— includes 9 polls from before the Fox News Channel debate and only two polls conducted after that. The Fox News Channel debate put Fiorina on the map. In current polls, she is coming in at 7th place, a showing that would easily put her on the main stage.
If Fiorina is bumped up to the main stage that means someone else is bumped down —as it should be. If a candidate is polling worse now as a result of his August 6th debate performance, and that puts him in position #11 or lower, he doesn’t deserve to be on the main debate stage. In a true free market of presidential politics, if people stop supporting a candidate, he has earned his way off the big stage.
Back to the question of why the RNC would have accepted —much less promoted— this methodology of determining the make up of the main stage. You can be assured that the RNC supports someone otherthan Carly Fiorina for President. Fiorina has been very persuasive and very effective on the campaign trail. That could certainly hurt someone like Jeb Bush, likely the RNC favorite. And in a 2014 article, the RNCadmitted that it wanted to keep out candidates whom they didn’t sanction. Is the RNC afraid of Carly Fiorina?
Having Fiorina on the main stage would also hurt front-runner Donald Trump. Voters are hungering for someone who is not a career politician. Like Trump, Fiorina is also an outsider to politics. But she says what needs to be said in a style that is far less abrasive than Donald Trump’s style. Trump’s manner of insulting people, either individually or as a group is beneath the dignity of the office he seeks.
A candidate calling a reporter a bimbo, at minimum, is terrible professional manners.I like candidates who don’t sound like career politicians. As the former proprietor of the Udall Lied campaign, I love that Fiorina speaks the truth plainly and clearly: Hillary Clinton Lied. There is plenty of evidence that Clinton lied, and Fiorina isn’t afraid to say it. She uses words that most people use in their daily lives and they can actually relate to what she says.
Fiorina should be on the main debate stage. The debate will be more interesting and more informative for her being there. Republicans say they believe in people earning their own way. Carly Fiorina has earned her way on to the main debate stage.
Who cares about Fiorina? She had no chance to win anyway. She is an old hag just like Hillary and her only achievement is that she was born as a female. Now women and minorities have much better chance to succeed.
Hardly a "war on women" when she was also excluded from the Fox debate for the same damn reason.
What about Fox news? Fox corporation is the perfect example of what us liberals mean when we talk about the Republicans war on women. News women were asked for sex in exchange for on air time or to climb the corporate ladder.They have declared a war on women by not letting Carly Fiorina in the upcoming Republican debate. Don't get mad lefties, you set the rules on this, I just decided to lower my IQ 140 points and use your rationale.